From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Zi Yan <zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/mm: pmd_mkinvalid() must handle swap pmds
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:23:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZjEbBasQ8H-wa84I@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41a83b7a-17e0-469d-bec4-10ebfff4ef57@arm.com>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 03:04:32PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 30/04/2024 14:55, Will Deacon wrote:
> > But it might be worth splitting the tests from the fix to make backporting
> > easier.
>
> Yes good point. I'll leave this hanging for today to see if any more comments
> come in, and will re-post tomorrow as 2 patches. I assume we need to go fast to
> catch 6.9.
Yes, I'll pick it up for 6.9. I can drop the tests from the patch (and
their mention in the log) and you can post your tests separately to go
via Andrew's tree.
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Zi Yan <zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/mm: pmd_mkinvalid() must handle swap pmds
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 17:23:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZjEbBasQ8H-wa84I@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41a83b7a-17e0-469d-bec4-10ebfff4ef57@arm.com>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 03:04:32PM +0100, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 30/04/2024 14:55, Will Deacon wrote:
> > But it might be worth splitting the tests from the fix to make backporting
> > easier.
>
> Yes good point. I'll leave this hanging for today to see if any more comments
> come in, and will re-post tomorrow as 2 patches. I assume we need to go fast to
> catch 6.9.
Yes, I'll pick it up for 6.9. I can drop the tests from the patch (and
their mention in the log) and you can post your tests separately to go
via Andrew's tree.
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-30 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-30 13:31 [PATCH v2] arm64/mm: pmd_mkinvalid() must handle swap pmds Ryan Roberts
2024-04-30 13:31 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-30 13:55 ` Will Deacon
2024-04-30 13:55 ` Will Deacon
2024-04-30 14:04 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-30 14:04 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-30 16:23 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2024-04-30 16:23 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-04-30 16:25 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-30 16:25 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-04-30 15:00 ` Zi Yan
2024-04-30 15:00 ` Zi Yan
2024-04-30 17:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-04-30 17:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-05-01 8:05 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-05-01 8:05 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-05-01 10:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-05-01 10:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-05-01 10:13 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-05-01 10:13 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-05-02 18:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-05-02 18:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-05-01 11:35 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-05-01 11:35 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-05-01 11:38 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-05-01 11:38 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-05-01 12:07 ` Zi Yan
2024-05-01 12:07 ` Zi Yan
2024-05-01 12:58 ` Ryan Roberts
2024-05-01 12:58 ` Ryan Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZjEbBasQ8H-wa84I@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.