From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] KVM: arm64: unify trap setup code
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 06:51:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZjHmX_O7KTInLuL5@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240426104950.7382-3-sebott@redhat.com>
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 12:49:46PM +0200, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> There are 2 functions to set up traps via HCR_EL2:
nitpick: these functions *calculate* the trap values, but do not
actually set them up. HCR_EL2 doesn't get written to until further down
the line on KVM_RUN.
> + if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_STAGE2_FWB)) {
> + vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 |= HCR_FWB;
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * For non-FWB CPUs, we trap VM ops (HCR_EL2.TVM) until M+C
> + * get set in SCTLR_EL1 such that we can detect when the guest
> + * MMU gets turned on and do the necessary cache maintenance
> + * then.
> + */
> + vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 |= HCR_TVM;
> + }
It seems to me like calling this once for the lifetime of a vCPU will
break non-FWB behavior.
Like the comment suggests, these traps are needed to catch the moment
the S1 MMU is turned on and do cache maintenance to make sure D$ agrees
with what the guest was doing before enabling the MMU.
KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT resets SCTLR_EL1, but it seems we'd miss setting
HCR_TVM in that case.
--
Thanks,
Oliver
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] KVM: arm64: unify trap setup code
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 06:51:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZjHmX_O7KTInLuL5@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240426104950.7382-3-sebott@redhat.com>
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 12:49:46PM +0200, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> There are 2 functions to set up traps via HCR_EL2:
nitpick: these functions *calculate* the trap values, but do not
actually set them up. HCR_EL2 doesn't get written to until further down
the line on KVM_RUN.
> + if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_STAGE2_FWB)) {
> + vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 |= HCR_FWB;
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * For non-FWB CPUs, we trap VM ops (HCR_EL2.TVM) until M+C
> + * get set in SCTLR_EL1 such that we can detect when the guest
> + * MMU gets turned on and do the necessary cache maintenance
> + * then.
> + */
> + vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 |= HCR_TVM;
> + }
It seems to me like calling this once for the lifetime of a vCPU will
break non-FWB behavior.
Like the comment suggests, these traps are needed to catch the moment
the S1 MMU is turned on and do cache maintenance to make sure D$ agrees
with what the guest was doing before enabling the MMU.
KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT resets SCTLR_EL1, but it seems we'd miss setting
HCR_TVM in that case.
--
Thanks,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-01 6:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-26 10:49 [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: arm64: emulation for CTR_EL0 Sebastian Ott
2024-04-26 10:49 ` Sebastian Ott
2024-04-26 10:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] KVM: arm64: change return value in arm64_check_features() Sebastian Ott
2024-04-26 10:49 ` Sebastian Ott
2024-04-26 10:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] KVM: arm64: unify trap setup code Sebastian Ott
2024-04-26 10:49 ` Sebastian Ott
2024-05-01 6:51 ` Oliver Upton [this message]
2024-05-01 6:51 ` Oliver Upton
2024-05-03 15:06 ` Sebastian Ott
2024-05-03 15:06 ` Sebastian Ott
2024-04-26 10:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: arm64: maintain per VM value for CTR_EL0 Sebastian Ott
2024-04-26 10:49 ` Sebastian Ott
2024-04-26 10:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: arm64: add emulation for CTR_EL0 register Sebastian Ott
2024-04-26 10:49 ` Sebastian Ott
2024-05-01 8:15 ` Oliver Upton
2024-05-01 8:15 ` Oliver Upton
2024-05-03 15:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-05-03 15:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-05-03 17:27 ` Oliver Upton
2024-05-03 17:27 ` Oliver Upton
2024-05-08 15:17 ` Sebastian Ott
2024-05-08 15:17 ` Sebastian Ott
2024-05-08 17:18 ` Oliver Upton
2024-05-08 17:18 ` Oliver Upton
2024-04-26 10:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: arm64: show writable masks for feature registers Sebastian Ott
2024-04-26 10:49 ` Sebastian Ott
2024-05-01 7:31 ` Oliver Upton
2024-05-01 7:31 ` Oliver Upton
2024-05-03 11:03 ` Sebastian Ott
2024-05-03 11:03 ` Sebastian Ott
2024-04-26 10:49 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] KVM: arm64: rename functions for invariant sys regs Sebastian Ott
2024-04-26 10:49 ` Sebastian Ott
2024-05-01 8:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: arm64: emulation for CTR_EL0 Oliver Upton
2024-05-01 8:17 ` Oliver Upton
2024-05-03 11:01 ` Sebastian Ott
2024-05-03 11:01 ` Sebastian Ott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZjHmX_O7KTInLuL5@linux.dev \
--to=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=sebott@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.