* [PATCH] x86/ucode: Distinguish "ucode already up to date"
@ 2024-05-08 16:18 Andrew Cooper
2024-05-08 16:32 ` Roger Pau Monné
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cooper @ 2024-05-08 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xen-devel; +Cc: Andrew Cooper, Jan Beulich, Roger Pau Monné
Right now, Xen returns -ENOENT for both "the provided blob isn't correct for
this CPU", and "the blob isn't newer than what's loaded".
This in turn causes xen-ucode to exit with an error, when "nothing to do" is
more commonly a success condition.
Handle EEXIST specially and exit cleanly.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
---
CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
---
tools/misc/xen-ucode.c | 5 ++++-
xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/misc/xen-ucode.c b/tools/misc/xen-ucode.c
index c6ae6498d659..390969db3d1c 100644
--- a/tools/misc/xen-ucode.c
+++ b/tools/misc/xen-ucode.c
@@ -125,8 +125,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
exit(1);
}
+ errno = 0;
ret = xc_microcode_update(xch, buf, len);
- if ( ret )
+ if ( ret == -1 && errno == EEXIST )
+ printf("Microcode already up to date\n");
+ else if ( ret )
{
fprintf(stderr, "Failed to update microcode. (err: %s)\n",
strerror(errno));
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c
index e738a88f5cd1..762111838f5f 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c
@@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ static long cf_check microcode_update_helper(void *data)
"microcode: couldn't find any newer%s revision in the provided blob!\n",
opt_ucode_allow_same ? " (or the same)" : "");
microcode_free_patch(patch);
- ret = -ENOENT;
+ ret = -EEXIST;
goto put;
}
base-commit: a2330b51df267e20e66bbba6c5bf08f0570ed58b
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86/ucode: Distinguish "ucode already up to date"
2024-05-08 16:18 [PATCH] x86/ucode: Distinguish "ucode already up to date" Andrew Cooper
@ 2024-05-08 16:32 ` Roger Pau Monné
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Roger Pau Monné @ 2024-05-08 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cooper; +Cc: Xen-devel, Jan Beulich
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 05:18:42PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Right now, Xen returns -ENOENT for both "the provided blob isn't correct for
> this CPU", and "the blob isn't newer than what's loaded".
>
> This in turn causes xen-ucode to exit with an error, when "nothing to do" is
> more commonly a success condition.
>
> Handle EEXIST specially and exit cleanly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-08 16:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-05-08 16:18 [PATCH] x86/ucode: Distinguish "ucode already up to date" Andrew Cooper
2024-05-08 16:32 ` Roger Pau Monné
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.