From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 05/16] powerpc/mm: Fix __find_linux_pte() on 32 bits with PMD leaf entries
Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 06:55:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZlQSWRvZuyaY886M@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa54834e9ee5e40179def32ff5834a8a2a02c413.1716714720.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 11:22:25AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Building on 32 bits with pmd_leaf() not returning always false leads
> to the following error:
>
> CC arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.o
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c: In function '__find_linux_pte':
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:506:1: error: function may return address of local variable [-Werror=return-local-addr]
> 506 | }
> | ^
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:394:15: note: declared here
> 394 | pud_t pud, *pudp;
> | ^~~
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:394:15: note: declared here
>
> This is due to pmd_offset() being a no-op in that case.
>
> So rework it for powerpc/32 so that pXd_offset() are used on real
> pointers and not on on-stack copies.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Maybe this could be folded into the patch that makes pmd_leaf() not returning
always false, but no strong feelings:
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 05/16] powerpc/mm: Fix __find_linux_pte() on 32 bits with PMD leaf entries
Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 06:55:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZlQSWRvZuyaY886M@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa54834e9ee5e40179def32ff5834a8a2a02c413.1716714720.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 11:22:25AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Building on 32 bits with pmd_leaf() not returning always false leads
> to the following error:
>
> CC arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.o
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c: In function '__find_linux_pte':
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:506:1: error: function may return address of local variable [-Werror=return-local-addr]
> 506 | }
> | ^
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:394:15: note: declared here
> 394 | pud_t pud, *pudp;
> | ^~~
> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:394:15: note: declared here
>
> This is due to pmd_offset() being a no-op in that case.
>
> So rework it for powerpc/32 so that pXd_offset() are used on real
> pointers and not on on-stack copies.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Maybe this could be folded into the patch that makes pmd_leaf() not returning
always false, but no strong feelings:
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-27 5:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-26 9:22 [RFC PATCH v3 00/16] Reimplement huge pages without hugepd on powerpc (8xx, e500, book3s/64) Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/16] powerpc/64e: Remove unused IBM HTW code [SQUASHED] Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/16] mm: Define __pte_leaf_size() to also take a PMD entry Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 4:52 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-27 4:52 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-26 9:22 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/16] mm: Provide mm_struct and address to huge_ptep_get() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 15:54 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-26 16:05 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-27 11:19 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-27 11:19 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-27 15:51 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 15:51 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 17:38 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-27 17:38 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-26 9:22 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/16] powerpc/mm: Remove _PAGE_PSIZE Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/16] powerpc/mm: Fix __find_linux_pte() on 32 bits with PMD leaf entries Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 15:02 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-27 4:55 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2024-05-27 4:55 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-27 5:16 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 5:16 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 11:25 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-27 11:25 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-26 9:22 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/16] powerpc/mm: Allow hugepages without hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 11:49 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-27 11:49 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-26 9:22 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/16] powerpc/8xx: Fix size given to set_huge_pte_at() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 4:56 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-27 4:56 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-26 9:22 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/16] powerpc/8xx: Rework support for 8M pages using contiguous PTE entries Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 12:10 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-27 12:10 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-28 10:53 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-28 10:53 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/16] powerpc/8xx: Simplify struct mmu_psize_def Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/16] powerpc/e500: Remove enc and ind fields from " Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/16] powerpc/e500: Switch to 64 bits PGD on 85xx (32 bits) Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/16] powerpc/e500: Encode hugepage size in PTE bits Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/16] powerpc/e500: Use contiguous PMD instead of hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/16] powerpc/64s: Use contiguous PMD/PUD instead of HUGEPD Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/16] powerpc/mm: Remove hugepd leftovers Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` [RFC PATCH v3 16/16] mm: Remove CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_HUGEPD Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 9:22 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-26 11:04 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/16] Reimplement huge pages without hugepd on powerpc (8xx, e500, book3s/64) Oscar Salvador
2024-05-26 11:04 ` Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZlQSWRvZuyaY886M@localhost.localdomain \
--to=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.