From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 13/16] powerpc/e500: Use contiguous PMD instead of hugepd
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 10:49:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZlbsEb_T2eQYO-g4@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56cf925576285e2b97550f4f7317183d98d596c5.1716815901.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 03:30:11PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> e500 supports many page sizes among which the following size are
> implemented in the kernel at the time being: 4M, 16M, 64M, 256M, 1G.
>
> On e500, TLB miss for hugepages is exclusively handled by SW even
> on e6500 which has HW assistance for 4k pages, so there are no
> constraints like on the 8xx.
>
> On e500/32, all are at PGD/PMD level and can be handled as
> cont-PMD.
>
> On e500/64, smaller ones are on PMD while bigger ones are on PUD.
> Again, they can easily be handled as cont-PMD and cont-PUD instead
> of hugepd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
...
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h
> index 90d6a0943b35..f7421d1a1693 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h
> @@ -52,11 +52,36 @@ static inline pte_basic_t pte_update(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, p
> {
> pte_basic_t old = pte_val(*p);
> pte_basic_t new = (old & ~(pte_basic_t)clr) | set;
> + unsigned long sz;
> + unsigned long pdsize;
> + int i;
>
> if (new == old)
> return old;
>
> - *p = __pte(new);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_E500
> + if (huge)
> + sz = 1UL << (((old & _PAGE_HSIZE_MSK) >> _PAGE_HSIZE_SHIFT) + 20);
> + else
I think this will not compile when CONFIG_PPC_85xx && !CONFIG_PTE_64BIT.
You have declared _PAGE_HSIZE_MSK and _PAGE_HSIZE_SHIFT in
arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/hugetlb-e500.h.
But hugetlb-e500.h is only included if CONFIG_PPC_85xx && CONFIG_PTE_64BIT
(see arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/32/pgtable.h).
> +#endif
> + sz = PAGE_SIZE;
> +
> + if (!huge || sz < PMD_SIZE)
> + pdsize = PAGE_SIZE;
> + else if (sz < PUD_SIZE)
> + pdsize = PMD_SIZE;
> + else if (sz < P4D_SIZE)
> + pdsize = PUD_SIZE;
> + else if (sz < PGDIR_SIZE)
> + pdsize = P4D_SIZE;
> + else
> + pdsize = PGDIR_SIZE;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < sz / pdsize; i++, p++) {
> + *p = __pte(new);
> + if (new)
> + new += (unsigned long long)(pdsize / PAGE_SIZE) << PTE_RPN_SHIFT;
I guess 'new' can be 0 if pte_update() is called on behave of clearing the pte?
> +static inline unsigned long pmd_leaf_size(pmd_t pmd)
> +{
> + return 1UL << (((pmd_val(pmd) & _PAGE_HSIZE_MSK) >> _PAGE_HSIZE_SHIFT) + 20);
Can we have the '20' somewhere defined with a comment on top explaining
what is so it is not a magic number?
Otherwise people might come look at this and wonder why 20.
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c
> @@ -331,6 +331,37 @@ void set_huge_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
> __set_huge_pte_at(pmdp, ptep, pte_val(pte));
> }
> }
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_PPC_E500)
> +void set_huge_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
> + pte_t pte, unsigned long sz)
> +{
> + unsigned long pdsize;
> + int i;
> +
> + pte = set_pte_filter(pte, addr);
> +
> + /*
> + * Make sure hardware valid bit is not set. We don't do
> + * tlb flush for this update.
> + */
> + VM_WARN_ON(pte_hw_valid(*ptep) && !pte_protnone(*ptep));
> +
> + if (sz < PMD_SIZE)
> + pdsize = PAGE_SIZE;
> + else if (sz < PUD_SIZE)
> + pdsize = PMD_SIZE;
> + else if (sz < P4D_SIZE)
> + pdsize = PUD_SIZE;
> + else if (sz < PGDIR_SIZE)
> + pdsize = P4D_SIZE;
> + else
> + pdsize = PGDIR_SIZE;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < sz / pdsize; i++, ptep++, addr += pdsize) {
> + __set_pte_at(mm, addr, ptep, pte, 0);
> + pte = __pte(pte_val(pte) + ((unsigned long long)pdsize / PAGE_SIZE << PFN_PTE_SHIFT));
You can use pte_advance_pfn() here? Just give have
nr = (unsigned long long)pdsize / PAGE_SIZE << PFN_PTE_SHIFT)
pte_advance_pfn(pte, nr)
Which 'sz's can we have here? You mentioned that e500 support:
4M, 16M, 64M, 256M, 1G.
which of these ones can be huge?
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 13/16] powerpc/e500: Use contiguous PMD instead of hugepd
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 10:49:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZlbsEb_T2eQYO-g4@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56cf925576285e2b97550f4f7317183d98d596c5.1716815901.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 03:30:11PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> e500 supports many page sizes among which the following size are
> implemented in the kernel at the time being: 4M, 16M, 64M, 256M, 1G.
>
> On e500, TLB miss for hugepages is exclusively handled by SW even
> on e6500 which has HW assistance for 4k pages, so there are no
> constraints like on the 8xx.
>
> On e500/32, all are at PGD/PMD level and can be handled as
> cont-PMD.
>
> On e500/64, smaller ones are on PMD while bigger ones are on PUD.
> Again, they can easily be handled as cont-PMD and cont-PUD instead
> of hugepd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
...
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h
> index 90d6a0943b35..f7421d1a1693 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h
> @@ -52,11 +52,36 @@ static inline pte_basic_t pte_update(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, p
> {
> pte_basic_t old = pte_val(*p);
> pte_basic_t new = (old & ~(pte_basic_t)clr) | set;
> + unsigned long sz;
> + unsigned long pdsize;
> + int i;
>
> if (new == old)
> return old;
>
> - *p = __pte(new);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_E500
> + if (huge)
> + sz = 1UL << (((old & _PAGE_HSIZE_MSK) >> _PAGE_HSIZE_SHIFT) + 20);
> + else
I think this will not compile when CONFIG_PPC_85xx && !CONFIG_PTE_64BIT.
You have declared _PAGE_HSIZE_MSK and _PAGE_HSIZE_SHIFT in
arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/hugetlb-e500.h.
But hugetlb-e500.h is only included if CONFIG_PPC_85xx && CONFIG_PTE_64BIT
(see arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/32/pgtable.h).
> +#endif
> + sz = PAGE_SIZE;
> +
> + if (!huge || sz < PMD_SIZE)
> + pdsize = PAGE_SIZE;
> + else if (sz < PUD_SIZE)
> + pdsize = PMD_SIZE;
> + else if (sz < P4D_SIZE)
> + pdsize = PUD_SIZE;
> + else if (sz < PGDIR_SIZE)
> + pdsize = P4D_SIZE;
> + else
> + pdsize = PGDIR_SIZE;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < sz / pdsize; i++, p++) {
> + *p = __pte(new);
> + if (new)
> + new += (unsigned long long)(pdsize / PAGE_SIZE) << PTE_RPN_SHIFT;
I guess 'new' can be 0 if pte_update() is called on behave of clearing the pte?
> +static inline unsigned long pmd_leaf_size(pmd_t pmd)
> +{
> + return 1UL << (((pmd_val(pmd) & _PAGE_HSIZE_MSK) >> _PAGE_HSIZE_SHIFT) + 20);
Can we have the '20' somewhere defined with a comment on top explaining
what is so it is not a magic number?
Otherwise people might come look at this and wonder why 20.
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c
> @@ -331,6 +331,37 @@ void set_huge_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
> __set_huge_pte_at(pmdp, ptep, pte_val(pte));
> }
> }
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_PPC_E500)
> +void set_huge_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
> + pte_t pte, unsigned long sz)
> +{
> + unsigned long pdsize;
> + int i;
> +
> + pte = set_pte_filter(pte, addr);
> +
> + /*
> + * Make sure hardware valid bit is not set. We don't do
> + * tlb flush for this update.
> + */
> + VM_WARN_ON(pte_hw_valid(*ptep) && !pte_protnone(*ptep));
> +
> + if (sz < PMD_SIZE)
> + pdsize = PAGE_SIZE;
> + else if (sz < PUD_SIZE)
> + pdsize = PMD_SIZE;
> + else if (sz < P4D_SIZE)
> + pdsize = PUD_SIZE;
> + else if (sz < PGDIR_SIZE)
> + pdsize = P4D_SIZE;
> + else
> + pdsize = PGDIR_SIZE;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < sz / pdsize; i++, ptep++, addr += pdsize) {
> + __set_pte_at(mm, addr, ptep, pte, 0);
> + pte = __pte(pte_val(pte) + ((unsigned long long)pdsize / PAGE_SIZE << PFN_PTE_SHIFT));
You can use pte_advance_pfn() here? Just give have
nr = (unsigned long long)pdsize / PAGE_SIZE << PFN_PTE_SHIFT)
pte_advance_pfn(pte, nr)
Which 'sz's can we have here? You mentioned that e500 support:
4M, 16M, 64M, 256M, 1G.
which of these ones can be huge?
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-29 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-27 13:29 [RFC PATCH v4 00/16] Reimplement huge pages without hugepd on powerpc (8xx, e500, book3s/64) Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:29 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:29 ` [RFC PATCH v4 01/16] powerpc/64e: Remove unused IBM HTW code [SQUASHED] Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:29 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 02/16] mm: Define __pte_leaf_size() to also take a PMD entry Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 03/16] mm: Provide mm_struct and address to huge_ptep_get() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-28 4:12 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-28 4:12 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-28 5:41 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-28 5:41 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-28 11:02 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-28 11:02 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 04/16] powerpc/mm: Remove _PAGE_PSIZE Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 05/16] powerpc/mm: Fix __find_linux_pte() on 32 bits with PMD leaf entries Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 06/16] powerpc/mm: Allow hugepages without hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 07/16] powerpc/8xx: Fix size given to set_huge_pte_at() Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 08/16] powerpc/8xx: Rework support for 8M pages using contiguous PTE entries Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 8:02 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 8:02 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 9:39 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 9:39 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 09/16] powerpc/8xx: Simplify struct mmu_psize_def Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 10/16] powerpc/e500: Remove enc and ind fields from " Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 11/16] powerpc/e500: Switch to 64 bits PGD on 85xx (32 bits) Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 12/16] powerpc/e500: Encode hugepage size in PTE bits Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 8:05 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 8:05 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 9:49 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 9:49 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 10:09 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 10:09 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 10:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 10:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 10:15 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 10:15 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 13/16] powerpc/e500: Use contiguous PMD instead of hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-28 6:38 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-29 8:49 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2024-05-29 8:49 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 9:58 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 9:58 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 10:05 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 10:05 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 14/16] powerpc/64s: Use contiguous PMD/PUD instead of HUGEPD Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 9:23 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 9:23 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 10:07 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 10:07 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 10:11 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 10:11 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 15/16] powerpc/mm: Remove hugepd leftovers Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 10:12 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 10:12 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-27 13:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 16/16] mm: Remove CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_HUGEPD Christophe Leroy
2024-05-27 13:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-05-29 10:13 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 10:13 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 20:49 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 20:49 ` Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 10:23 ` [RFC PATCH v4 00/16] Reimplement huge pages without hugepd on powerpc (8xx, e500, book3s/64) Oscar Salvador
2024-05-29 10:23 ` Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZlbsEb_T2eQYO-g4@localhost.localdomain \
--to=osalvador@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.