From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Sneh Shah <quic_snehshah@quicinc.com>,
Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: dwmac-qcom-ethqos: Add support for 2.5G SGMII
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 21:13:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZleMdFsmQzXGp1GM@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67553944-5d3f-4641-a719-da84554c0a9f@lunn.ch>
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 04:28:16PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Qualcomm ethernet HW supports 2.5G speed in overclocked SGMII mode.
> > we internally term it as OCSGMII.
>
> So it still does SGMII inband signalling? Not 2500BaseX signalling? It
> is not actually compatible with 2500BaseX?
>
> > End goal of these patches is to enable SGMII with 2.5G speed support.
> > The patch in these series enabled up SGMII with 2.5 for cases where we
> > don't have external phy. ( mac-to-mac connectivity)
>
> So the other end needs to be an over clocked SGMII MAC, not 2500BaseX?
>
> > The new patch posted extends this for the case when the MAC has an
> > external phy connected. ( hence we are advertising fr 2.5G speed by adding
> > 2500BASEX as supported interface in phylink)
>
> And i assume it does not actually work against a true 2500BaseX
> device, because it is doing SGMII inband signalling?
I really hope the hardware isn't using any SGMII inband signalling
at 2.5G speeds. Other devices explicitly state that SGMII inband
signalling while operating the elevated 2.5G speed is *not* supported!
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Sneh Shah <quic_snehshah@quicinc.com>,
Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: dwmac-qcom-ethqos: Add support for 2.5G SGMII
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 21:13:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZleMdFsmQzXGp1GM@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67553944-5d3f-4641-a719-da84554c0a9f@lunn.ch>
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 04:28:16PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Qualcomm ethernet HW supports 2.5G speed in overclocked SGMII mode.
> > we internally term it as OCSGMII.
>
> So it still does SGMII inband signalling? Not 2500BaseX signalling? It
> is not actually compatible with 2500BaseX?
>
> > End goal of these patches is to enable SGMII with 2.5G speed support.
> > The patch in these series enabled up SGMII with 2.5 for cases where we
> > don't have external phy. ( mac-to-mac connectivity)
>
> So the other end needs to be an over clocked SGMII MAC, not 2500BaseX?
>
> > The new patch posted extends this for the case when the MAC has an
> > external phy connected. ( hence we are advertising fr 2.5G speed by adding
> > 2500BASEX as supported interface in phylink)
>
> And i assume it does not actually work against a true 2500BaseX
> device, because it is doing SGMII inband signalling?
I really hope the hardware isn't using any SGMII inband signalling
at 2.5G speeds. Other devices explicitly state that SGMII inband
signalling while operating the elevated 2.5G speed is *not* supported!
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-29 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-18 7:11 [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: dwmac-qcom-ethqos: Add support for 2.5G SGMII Sneh Shah
2023-12-18 7:11 ` Sneh Shah
2023-12-18 14:21 ` Maxime Chevallier
2023-12-18 14:21 ` Maxime Chevallier
2023-12-18 14:32 ` Sneh Shah
2023-12-18 14:32 ` Sneh Shah
2023-12-18 16:20 ` Andrew Halaney
2023-12-18 16:20 ` Andrew Halaney
2023-12-18 16:31 ` Andrew Halaney
2023-12-18 16:31 ` Andrew Halaney
2023-12-20 7:32 ` Sneh Shah
2023-12-20 7:32 ` Sneh Shah
2023-12-20 15:59 ` Andrew Halaney
2023-12-20 15:59 ` Andrew Halaney
2023-12-21 8:53 ` Sneh Shah
2023-12-21 8:53 ` Sneh Shah
2023-12-21 14:30 ` Andrew Halaney
2023-12-21 14:30 ` Andrew Halaney
2023-12-21 16:58 ` [Linux-stm32] " Maxime Chevallier
2023-12-21 16:58 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-26 16:27 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-05-26 16:27 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-05-28 22:35 ` Andrew Halaney
2024-05-28 22:35 ` Andrew Halaney
2024-05-29 14:13 ` Sneh Shah
2024-05-29 14:13 ` Sneh Shah
2024-05-29 14:28 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-05-29 14:28 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-05-29 20:13 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2024-05-29 20:13 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-06-03 11:15 ` Sneh Shah
2024-06-03 11:15 ` Sneh Shah
2024-05-29 20:09 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-05-29 20:09 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-06-03 11:27 ` Sneh Shah
2024-06-03 11:27 ` Sneh Shah
2024-06-03 13:12 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-06-03 13:12 ` Russell King (Oracle)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZleMdFsmQzXGp1GM@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=ahalaney@redhat.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=kernel@quicinc.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=quic_snehshah@quicinc.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.