From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Maxwell Bland <mbland@motorola.com>
Cc: "open list:BPF [GENERAL] (Safe Dynamic Programs and Tools)"
<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/3] cfi: add C CFI type macro
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:30:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zmh7pIpTlexcCyOL@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cwhnmpn5yvg6ma7mvjviy4p7z6gdoba57daeprpc4zcokfhpv2@44gvdmcfuspt>
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 01:06:33PM -0500, Maxwell Bland wrote:
> From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>
> Currently x86 and riscv open-code 4 instances of the same logic to
> define a u32 variable with the KCFI typeid of a given function.
>
> Replace the duplicate logic with a common macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
This patch is missing your signed-off-by (the same with the second
patch). Since you are submitting it, you should also add yours in
addition to the author's s-o-b.
--
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Maxwell Bland <mbland@motorola.com>
Cc: "open list:BPF [GENERAL] (Safe Dynamic Programs and Tools)"
<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/3] cfi: add C CFI type macro
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:30:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zmh7pIpTlexcCyOL@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cwhnmpn5yvg6ma7mvjviy4p7z6gdoba57daeprpc4zcokfhpv2@44gvdmcfuspt>
On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 01:06:33PM -0500, Maxwell Bland wrote:
> From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>
> Currently x86 and riscv open-code 4 instances of the same logic to
> define a u32 variable with the KCFI typeid of a given function.
>
> Replace the duplicate logic with a common macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
This patch is missing your signed-off-by (the same with the second
patch). Since you are submitting it, you should also add yours in
addition to the author's s-o-b.
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-11 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-10 18:05 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/3] Support kCFI + BPF on arm64 Maxwell Bland
2024-06-10 18:05 ` Maxwell Bland
2024-06-10 18:18 ` Maxwell Bland
2024-06-10 18:18 ` Maxwell Bland
2024-06-10 18:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/3] cfi: add C CFI type macro Maxwell Bland
2024-06-11 10:05 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-11 10:05 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-11 16:30 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2024-06-11 16:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-06-12 15:36 ` Maxwell Bland
2024-06-10 18:08 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/3] arm64/cfi,bpf: Support kCFI + BPF on arm64 Maxwell Bland
2024-06-10 18:09 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/3] arm64/cfi,bpf: Use DEFINE_CFI_TYPE in arm64 Maxwell Bland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zmh7pIpTlexcCyOL@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mbland@motorola.com \
--cc=puranjay12@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=zlim.lnx@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.