From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
kuba@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org, Roy.Pledge@nxp.com,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] soc: fsl: qbman: FSL_DPAA depends on COMPILE_TEST
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:40:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zn2yGBuwiW/BYvQ7@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240626140623.7ebsspddqwc24ne4@skbuf>
Hello Vladimir,
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 05:06:23PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 08:09:53PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > >> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c:3280:12: warning: stack frame size (16664) exceeds limit (2048) in 'dpaa_eth_probe' [-Wframe-larger-than]
> > 3280 | static int dpaa_eth_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > | ^
> > 1 warning generated.
> > --
> > >> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_ethtool.c:454:12: warning: stack frame size (8264) exceeds limit (2048) in 'dpaa_set_coalesce' [-Wframe-larger-than]
> > 454 | static int dpaa_set_coalesce(struct net_device *dev,
> > | ^
> > 1 warning generated.
>
> Arrays of NR_CPUS elements are what it probably doesn't like?
Can it use the number of online CPUs instead of NR_CPUS?
Other than that, I would say we can drop this patch in the meantime, so,
we can move with the others, while this one is being addressed.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Roy.Pledge@nxp.com, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
horms@kernel.org, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, kuba@kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] soc: fsl: qbman: FSL_DPAA depends on COMPILE_TEST
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 11:40:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zn2yGBuwiW/BYvQ7@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240626140623.7ebsspddqwc24ne4@skbuf>
Hello Vladimir,
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 05:06:23PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 08:09:53PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > >> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c:3280:12: warning: stack frame size (16664) exceeds limit (2048) in 'dpaa_eth_probe' [-Wframe-larger-than]
> > 3280 | static int dpaa_eth_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > | ^
> > 1 warning generated.
> > --
> > >> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_ethtool.c:454:12: warning: stack frame size (8264) exceeds limit (2048) in 'dpaa_set_coalesce' [-Wframe-larger-than]
> > 454 | static int dpaa_set_coalesce(struct net_device *dev,
> > | ^
> > 1 warning generated.
>
> Arrays of NR_CPUS elements are what it probably doesn't like?
Can it use the number of online CPUs instead of NR_CPUS?
Other than that, I would say we can drop this patch in the meantime, so,
we can move with the others, while this one is being addressed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-27 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-24 16:21 [PATCH 1/4] soc: fsl: qbman: FSL_DPAA depends on COMPILE_TEST Breno Leitao
2024-06-24 16:21 ` Breno Leitao
2024-06-24 16:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] crypto: caam: Depend on COMPILE_TEST also Breno Leitao
2024-06-24 16:21 ` Breno Leitao
2024-06-29 11:29 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-29 11:29 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-24 16:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] crypto: caam: Unembed net_dev structure from qi Breno Leitao
2024-06-24 16:21 ` Breno Leitao
2024-06-28 16:32 ` Simon Horman
2024-06-28 16:32 ` Simon Horman
2024-07-02 13:32 ` Breno Leitao
2024-07-02 13:32 ` Breno Leitao
2024-06-24 16:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] crypto: caam: Unembed net_dev structure in dpaa2 Breno Leitao
2024-06-24 16:21 ` Breno Leitao
2024-06-25 14:39 ` [PATCH 1/4] soc: fsl: qbman: FSL_DPAA depends on COMPILE_TEST Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-25 14:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-25 22:06 ` Herbert Xu
2024-06-25 22:06 ` Herbert Xu
2024-06-26 12:09 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-26 12:09 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-26 14:06 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-06-26 14:06 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-06-27 18:40 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2024-06-27 18:40 ` Breno Leitao
2024-07-08 13:37 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-07-08 13:37 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-07-08 19:08 ` Breno Leitao
2024-07-08 19:08 ` Breno Leitao
2024-07-09 13:58 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-07-09 13:58 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-07-09 15:15 ` Breno Leitao
2024-07-09 15:15 ` Breno Leitao
2024-07-09 15:25 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-07-09 15:25 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-06-29 13:55 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-29 13:55 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zn2yGBuwiW/BYvQ7@gmail.com \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=Roy.Pledge@nxp.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.