Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] RISC-V: Check scalar unaligned access on all CPUs

From: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
To: Jesse Taube <jesse@rivosinc.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Clément Léger" <cleger@rivosinc.com>,
	"Evan Green" <evan@rivosinc.com>,
	"Andrew Jones" <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
	"Xiao Wang" <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>,
	"Andy Chiu" <andy.chiu@sifive.com>,
	"Eric Biggers" <ebiggers@google.com>,
	"Greentime Hu" <greentime.hu@sifive.com>,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@rivosinc.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Costa Shulyupin" <costa.shul@redhat.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Baoquan He" <bhe@redhat.com>,
	"Anup Patel" <apatel@ventanamicro.com>,
	"Zong Li" <zong.li@sifive.com>,
	"Sami Tolvanen" <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	"Ben Dooks" <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
	"Alexandre Ghiti" <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	"Erick Archer" <erick.archer@gmx.com>,
	"Joel Granados" <j.granados@samsung.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] RISC-V: Check scalar unaligned access on all CPUs
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 15:38:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZpBe8ECHxJ9QXVB2@ghost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240711215846.834365-4-jesse@rivosinc.com>

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 05:58:42PM -0400, Jesse Taube wrote:
> Originally, the check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus function
> only checked the boot hart. This fixes the function to check all
> harts.
> 
> Fixes: 71c54b3d169d ("riscv: report misaligned accesses emulation to hwprobe")
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube <jesse@rivosinc.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> V1 -> V2:
>  - New patch
> V2 -> V3:
>  - Split patch
> V3 -> V4:
>  - Re-add check for a system where a heterogeneous
>     CPU is hotplugged into a previously homogenous
>     system.
> ---
>  arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c | 14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
> index b62d5a2f4541..1a1bb41472ea 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps_misaligned.c
> @@ -526,11 +526,11 @@ int handle_misaligned_store(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static bool check_unaligned_access_emulated(int cpu)
> +static void check_unaligned_access_emulated(struct work_struct *unused)

Small change, can you give this a different name like "work" and instead
give it the attribute "__always_unused" like:

struct work_struct *work __always_unused

Otherwise,

Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>

>  {
> +	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  	long *mas_ptr = per_cpu_ptr(&misaligned_access_speed, cpu);
>  	unsigned long tmp_var, tmp_val;
> -	bool misaligned_emu_detected;
>  
>  	*mas_ptr = RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_UNKNOWN;
>  
> @@ -538,19 +538,16 @@ static bool check_unaligned_access_emulated(int cpu)
>  		"       "REG_L" %[tmp], 1(%[ptr])\n"
>  		: [tmp] "=r" (tmp_val) : [ptr] "r" (&tmp_var) : "memory");
>  
> -	misaligned_emu_detected = (*mas_ptr == RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED);
>  	/*
>  	 * If unaligned_ctl is already set, this means that we detected that all
>  	 * CPUS uses emulated misaligned access at boot time. If that changed
>  	 * when hotplugging the new cpu, this is something we don't handle.
>  	 */
> -	if (unlikely(unaligned_ctl && !misaligned_emu_detected)) {
> +	if (unlikely(unaligned_ctl && (*mas_ptr != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED))) {
>  		pr_crit("CPU misaligned accesses non homogeneous (expected all emulated)\n");
>  		while (true)
>  			cpu_relax();
>  	}
> -
> -	return misaligned_emu_detected;
>  }
>  
>  bool check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void)
> @@ -562,8 +559,11 @@ bool check_unaligned_access_emulated_all_cpus(void)
>  	 * accesses emulated since tasks requesting such control can run on any
>  	 * CPU.
>  	 */
> +	schedule_on_each_cpu(check_unaligned_access_emulated);
> +
>  	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> -		if (!check_unaligned_access_emulated(cpu))
> +		if (per_cpu(misaligned_access_speed, cpu)
> +		    != RISCV_HWPROBE_MISALIGNED_EMULATED)
>  			return false;
>  
>  	unaligned_ctl = true;
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 