* [GIT PULL] nolibc for 6.11-rc1
@ 2024-06-29 11:04 Thomas Weißschuh
2024-06-30 16:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Weißschuh @ 2024-06-29 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul E. McKenney; +Cc: Shuah Khan, Willy Tarreau, linux-kernel
Hi Paul,
The following changes since commit f2661062f16b2de5d7b6a5c42a9a5c96326b8454:
Linux 6.10-rc5 (2024-06-23 17:08:54 -0400)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git tags/nolibc-20240629-for-6.11-1
for you to fetch changes up to 6ca8f2e20bd1ced8a7cd12b3ae4b1ceca85cfc2b:
selftests: kselftest: also use strerror() on nolibc (2024-06-29 09:44:58 +0200)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas Weißschuh (8):
selftests/nolibc: fix printf format mismatch in expect_str_buf_eq()
selftests/nolibc: disable brk()/sbrk() tests on musl
selftests/nolibc: run-tests.sh: use -Werror by default
tools/nolibc: add limits for {u,}intmax_t, ulong and {u,}llong
tools/nolibc: implement strtol() and friends
selftests/nolibc: introduce condition to run tests only on nolibc
tools/nolibc: implement strerror()
selftests: kselftest: also use strerror() on nolibc
tools/include/nolibc/stdint.h | 19 +++++
tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h | 10 +++
tools/include/nolibc/stdlib.h | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h | 8 --
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/run-tests.sh | 9 ++-
7 files changed, 238 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
Thanks,
Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] nolibc for 6.11-rc1
2024-06-29 11:04 [GIT PULL] nolibc for 6.11-rc1 Thomas Weißschuh
@ 2024-06-30 16:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-07-13 3:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2024-06-30 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Weißschuh; +Cc: Shuah Khan, Willy Tarreau, linux-kernel
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 01:04:08PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> The following changes since commit f2661062f16b2de5d7b6a5c42a9a5c96326b8454:
>
> Linux 6.10-rc5 (2024-06-23 17:08:54 -0400)
>
> are available in the Git repository at:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git tags/nolibc-20240629-for-6.11-1
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 6ca8f2e20bd1ced8a7cd12b3ae4b1ceca85cfc2b:
>
> selftests: kselftest: also use strerror() on nolibc (2024-06-29 09:44:58 +0200)
Hearing no objections, I have pulled this in so that it will appear
in the next -next. Here are the test results:
make run:
195 test(s): 195 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success
make run-user:
195 test(s): 193 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning
So looks good to me!
Thanx, Paul
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Thomas Weißschuh (8):
> selftests/nolibc: fix printf format mismatch in expect_str_buf_eq()
> selftests/nolibc: disable brk()/sbrk() tests on musl
> selftests/nolibc: run-tests.sh: use -Werror by default
> tools/nolibc: add limits for {u,}intmax_t, ulong and {u,}llong
> tools/nolibc: implement strtol() and friends
> selftests/nolibc: introduce condition to run tests only on nolibc
> tools/nolibc: implement strerror()
> selftests: kselftest: also use strerror() on nolibc
>
> tools/include/nolibc/stdint.h | 19 +++++
> tools/include/nolibc/stdio.h | 10 +++
> tools/include/nolibc/stdlib.h | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h | 8 --
> tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/run-tests.sh | 9 ++-
> 7 files changed, 238 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] nolibc for 6.11-rc1
2024-06-30 16:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
@ 2024-07-13 3:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-07-14 4:57 ` Willy Tarreau
2024-07-14 8:09 ` Thomas Weißschuh
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2024-07-13 3:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Weißschuh; +Cc: Shuah Khan, Willy Tarreau, linux-kernel
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 09:06:39AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 01:04:08PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > The following changes since commit f2661062f16b2de5d7b6a5c42a9a5c96326b8454:
> >
> > Linux 6.10-rc5 (2024-06-23 17:08:54 -0400)
> >
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git tags/nolibc-20240629-for-6.11-1
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to 6ca8f2e20bd1ced8a7cd12b3ae4b1ceca85cfc2b:
> >
> > selftests: kselftest: also use strerror() on nolibc (2024-06-29 09:44:58 +0200)
>
> Hearing no objections, I have pulled this in so that it will appear
> in the next -next. Here are the test results:
>
> make run:
> 195 test(s): 195 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success
>
> make run-user:
> 195 test(s): 193 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning
>
> So looks good to me!
And please see below for my proposed signed tag. Please let me know of
any needed adjustments.
Thanx, Paul
----------------------------------------------------------------
tag nolibc.2024.07.12a
Tagger: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Fri Jul 12 16:56:21 2024 -0700
nolibc updates for v6.11
o Fix selftest printf format mismatch in expect_str_buf_eq()
o Stop using brk() and sbrk() when testing against musl, which
implements these two functions with ENOMEM.
o Make tests us -Werror to force failure on compiler warnings.
o Add limits for the {u,}intmax_t, ulong and {u,}llong types.
o Implement strtol() and friends.
o Add facility to skip nolibc-specific tests when running against
non-nolibc libraries.
o Implement strerror().
o Use strerror() unconditionally, instead of only when running
against non-nolibc libraries.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=e/Ia
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] nolibc for 6.11-rc1
2024-07-13 3:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
@ 2024-07-14 4:57 ` Willy Tarreau
2024-07-14 15:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-07-14 8:09 ` Thomas Weißschuh
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Willy Tarreau @ 2024-07-14 4:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul E. McKenney; +Cc: Thomas Weißschuh, Shuah Khan, linux-kernel
Hello Paul,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 08:16:13PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 09:06:39AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 01:04:08PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > Hi Paul,
> > >
> > > The following changes since commit f2661062f16b2de5d7b6a5c42a9a5c96326b8454:
> > >
> > > Linux 6.10-rc5 (2024-06-23 17:08:54 -0400)
> > >
> > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > >
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git tags/nolibc-20240629-for-6.11-1
> > >
> > > for you to fetch changes up to 6ca8f2e20bd1ced8a7cd12b3ae4b1ceca85cfc2b:
> > >
> > > selftests: kselftest: also use strerror() on nolibc (2024-06-29 09:44:58 +0200)
> >
> > Hearing no objections, I have pulled this in so that it will appear
> > in the next -next. Here are the test results:
> >
> > make run:
> > 195 test(s): 195 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success
> >
> > make run-user:
> > 195 test(s): 193 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning
> >
> > So looks good to me!
>
> And please see below for my proposed signed tag. Please let me know of
> any needed adjustments.
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> tag nolibc.2024.07.12a
> Tagger: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Date: Fri Jul 12 16:56:21 2024 -0700
>
> nolibc updates for v6.11
>
> o Fix selftest printf format mismatch in expect_str_buf_eq()
>
> o Stop using brk() and sbrk() when testing against musl, which
> implements these two functions with ENOMEM.
>
> o Make tests us -Werror to force failure on compiler warnings.
^^
s/us/use
> o Add limits for the {u,}intmax_t, ulong and {u,}llong types.
>
> o Implement strtol() and friends.
>
> o Add facility to skip nolibc-specific tests when running against
> non-nolibc libraries.
>
> o Implement strerror().
>
> o Use strerror() unconditionally, instead of only when running
> against non-nolibc libraries.
All of this looks good to me.
Thank you!
Willy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] nolibc for 6.11-rc1
2024-07-13 3:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-07-14 4:57 ` Willy Tarreau
@ 2024-07-14 8:09 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-07-14 16:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Weißschuh @ 2024-07-14 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul E. McKenney; +Cc: Shuah Khan, Willy Tarreau, linux-kernel
On 2024-07-12 20:16:13+0000, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 09:06:39AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 01:04:08PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > Hi Paul,
> > >
> > > The following changes since commit f2661062f16b2de5d7b6a5c42a9a5c96326b8454:
> > >
> > > Linux 6.10-rc5 (2024-06-23 17:08:54 -0400)
> > >
> > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > >
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git tags/nolibc-20240629-for-6.11-1
> > >
> > > for you to fetch changes up to 6ca8f2e20bd1ced8a7cd12b3ae4b1ceca85cfc2b:
> > >
> > > selftests: kselftest: also use strerror() on nolibc (2024-06-29 09:44:58 +0200)
> >
> > Hearing no objections, I have pulled this in so that it will appear
> > in the next -next. Here are the test results:
> >
> > make run:
> > 195 test(s): 195 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success
> >
> > make run-user:
> > 195 test(s): 193 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning
> >
> > So looks good to me!
For testing you can use "./run-tests.sh -m [user | system]" to run the
tests on all supported architectures via QEMU.
(On the first run you can use "-p" to download the toolchains)
> And please see below for my proposed signed tag. Please let me know of
> any needed adjustments.
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> tag nolibc.2024.07.12a
> Tagger: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Date: Fri Jul 12 16:56:21 2024 -0700
>
> nolibc updates for v6.11
>
> o Fix selftest printf format mismatch in expect_str_buf_eq()
Period at the end.
>
> o Stop using brk() and sbrk() when testing against musl, which
> implements these two functions with ENOMEM.
>
> o Make tests us -Werror to force failure on compiler warnings.
>
> o Add limits for the {u,}intmax_t, ulong and {u,}llong types.
>
> o Implement strtol() and friends.
>
> o Add facility to skip nolibc-specific tests when running against
> non-nolibc libraries.
>
> o Implement strerror().
>
> o Use strerror() unconditionally, instead of only when running
> against non-nolibc libraries.
Maybe mention that this is about kselftest and not nolibc itself.
Otherwise looks good, thanks!
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQJHBAABCgAxFiEEbK7UrM+RBIrCoViJnr8S83LZ+4wFAmaRxC8THHBhdWxtY2tA
> a2VybmVsLm9yZwAKCRCevxLzctn7jCmDD/9dME6sIhlb7+Bm0V1PXH1YbrqBR8rA
> FRj620xKl2MMrpxxNDiRtv+5mI28fQklVD1wqZUB7tQV3yq6onFnA2C7QGZLn/kl
> 9smF6Jxad/ZHYKC4DfuECLLtA/vFutNvpRTrdMUyeTQDaUWZisByzMTSHrvqhHEz
> K98sL81uWIIovSM5mQA+RxMrmydT0ts683jfqXi56NPPOUaYSlERl8KZhvUaM+Rn
> gG+vULwS7d32/EOI1FJ5qyPVVTr7wC0sKueyKPmPcjfFTtNsip4EZFLsjS9lqezW
> m4PM0qCL3XkfgWPek3CIYqd8Y/mjPVYu6m0Mxji3PYboQjZjYON2E8r8EE/fw6Oi
> VLc0etIrycus7uVyBCw4LxJHhdINdpxnQG6Qji4OVilvbKCU+PA3ecepxUVGtlK+
> 3ffjanrwv841eGX7/glPElh3Cj9SJackRU5N5hXisJpWc8ode0NxVBI0g7dn6jF5
> sLtZO/JIEof+W+/Hj++3LMQKGi7OrQy0lBe64ENg+l7qhp6Aq3rxjwvZAnTVFtVq
> Dh86Wi3JD7Y6wovB1z9hlaAm1xtigxP7j0Gwr6RwSyPTNCrQvUUPOClfonjkqGN/
> B28gkbOAKBd4gbgt3d8UYGliaeiBuX23KTAR9tU2rnrJOudLeBlewlPyW09jFS98
> jdz8Ay8fuZp+Qw==
> =e/Ia
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] nolibc for 6.11-rc1
2024-07-14 4:57 ` Willy Tarreau
@ 2024-07-14 15:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2024-07-14 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Willy Tarreau; +Cc: Thomas Weißschuh, Shuah Khan, linux-kernel
On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 06:57:32AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hello Paul,
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 08:16:13PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 09:06:39AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 01:04:08PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > > Hi Paul,
> > > >
> > > > The following changes since commit f2661062f16b2de5d7b6a5c42a9a5c96326b8454:
> > > >
> > > > Linux 6.10-rc5 (2024-06-23 17:08:54 -0400)
> > > >
> > > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > > >
> > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git tags/nolibc-20240629-for-6.11-1
> > > >
> > > > for you to fetch changes up to 6ca8f2e20bd1ced8a7cd12b3ae4b1ceca85cfc2b:
> > > >
> > > > selftests: kselftest: also use strerror() on nolibc (2024-06-29 09:44:58 +0200)
> > >
> > > Hearing no objections, I have pulled this in so that it will appear
> > > in the next -next. Here are the test results:
> > >
> > > make run:
> > > 195 test(s): 195 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success
> > >
> > > make run-user:
> > > 195 test(s): 193 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning
> > >
> > > So looks good to me!
> >
> > And please see below for my proposed signed tag. Please let me know of
> > any needed adjustments.
> >
> > Thanx, Paul
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > tag nolibc.2024.07.12a
> > Tagger: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > Date: Fri Jul 12 16:56:21 2024 -0700
> >
> > nolibc updates for v6.11
> >
> > o Fix selftest printf format mismatch in expect_str_buf_eq()
> >
> > o Stop using brk() and sbrk() when testing against musl, which
> > implements these two functions with ENOMEM.
> >
> > o Make tests us -Werror to force failure on compiler warnings.
> ^^
> s/us/use
Good catch, fixed, thank you!
> > o Add limits for the {u,}intmax_t, ulong and {u,}llong types.
> >
> > o Implement strtol() and friends.
> >
> > o Add facility to skip nolibc-specific tests when running against
> > non-nolibc libraries.
> >
> > o Implement strerror().
> >
> > o Use strerror() unconditionally, instead of only when running
> > against non-nolibc libraries.
>
> All of this looks good to me.
Thank you for looking it over!
Thanx, Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] nolibc for 6.11-rc1
2024-07-14 8:09 ` Thomas Weißschuh
@ 2024-07-14 16:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-07-15 7:00 ` Thomas Weißschuh
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2024-07-14 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Weißschuh; +Cc: Shuah Khan, Willy Tarreau, linux-kernel
On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 10:09:13AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2024-07-12 20:16:13+0000, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 09:06:39AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 01:04:08PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > > Hi Paul,
> > > >
> > > > The following changes since commit f2661062f16b2de5d7b6a5c42a9a5c96326b8454:
> > > >
> > > > Linux 6.10-rc5 (2024-06-23 17:08:54 -0400)
> > > >
> > > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > > >
> > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git tags/nolibc-20240629-for-6.11-1
> > > >
> > > > for you to fetch changes up to 6ca8f2e20bd1ced8a7cd12b3ae4b1ceca85cfc2b:
> > > >
> > > > selftests: kselftest: also use strerror() on nolibc (2024-06-29 09:44:58 +0200)
> > >
> > > Hearing no objections, I have pulled this in so that it will appear
> > > in the next -next. Here are the test results:
> > >
> > > make run:
> > > 195 test(s): 195 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success
> > >
> > > make run-user:
> > > 195 test(s): 193 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning
> > >
> > > So looks good to me!
>
> For testing you can use "./run-tests.sh -m [user | system]" to run the
> tests on all supported architectures via QEMU.
>
> (On the first run you can use "-p" to download the toolchains)
Thank you for the info!
My near-term plan is that I do a smoke test on x86 (or whatever I am
running), and let you guys cover the various architectures. Longer
term, I might get more into cross-architecture work.
> > And please see below for my proposed signed tag. Please let me know of
> > any needed adjustments.
> >
> > Thanx, Paul
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > tag nolibc.2024.07.12a
> > Tagger: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > Date: Fri Jul 12 16:56:21 2024 -0700
> >
> > nolibc updates for v6.11
> >
> > o Fix selftest printf format mismatch in expect_str_buf_eq()
>
> Period at the end.
Good eyes, thank you, fixed.
> > o Stop using brk() and sbrk() when testing against musl, which
> > implements these two functions with ENOMEM.
> >
> > o Make tests us -Werror to force failure on compiler warnings.
> >
> > o Add limits for the {u,}intmax_t, ulong and {u,}llong types.
> >
> > o Implement strtol() and friends.
> >
> > o Add facility to skip nolibc-specific tests when running against
> > non-nolibc libraries.
> >
> > o Implement strerror().
> >
> > o Use strerror() unconditionally, instead of only when running
> > against non-nolibc libraries.
>
> Maybe mention that this is about kselftest and not nolibc itself.
>
> Otherwise looks good, thanks!
Thank you for looking this over, and does the updated version below
cover this? If I am still off, please suggest updates.
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
tag nolibc.2024.07.14a
Tagger: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Sun Jul 14 09:07:29 2024 -0700
nolibc updates for v6.11
o Fix selftest printf format mismatch in expect_str_buf_eq().
o Stop using brk() and sbrk() when testing against musl, which
implements these two functions with ENOMEM.
o Make tests use -Werror to force failure on compiler warnings.
o Add limits for the {u,}intmax_t, ulong and {u,}llong types.
o Implement strtol() and friends.
o Add facility to skip nolibc-specific tests when running against
non-nolibc libraries.
o Implement strerror().
o Use strerror() unconditionally, instead of only when running
kselftest.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQJHBAABCgAxFiEEbK7UrM+RBIrCoViJnr8S83LZ+4wFAmaT98oTHHBhdWxtY2tA
a2VybmVsLm9yZwAKCRCevxLzctn7jHc0D/9chhJo+QQ+2V+xQEKT8n1MKiJaf55X
EUhIlKHoejrF7rZukqv1tcqMNP0wGzwKyttbFkX+72OHrxSuNr0MbvBjQi6cFcFo
2QNg/ZEVIZKeMJzRXwUOOrg47hwLoGgFrt5cgSCMeYSm0E25oAx752/WbmQgQBlU
2dOTomrxF7pyDQoJwPU3CNAk/fFZHuBX9Hjp0LPaXmKDq9BLWqUWoJZAOAfcxm2Q
F8A/HnOTEp5F5qwJLr0GStNxR44xH/GU/3KEdryzllEFj6PTLDAeP4oNdMK30q9F
YGrcpON3hjw1+XKQBTLJ/UIqQ3EeA/bo2yDOLsFZObU7aKrb7ewtxTq/DWUfoj4x
jfFCOc6JpsmAAlwm2zXn+MLDLxSF3QhTalpl1o4thrNgxhm/Eou+uz/1k2EREp/r
4PfHC+i0YjGA9sJ12u1hUoPkxHXY0GKx+gHL9uwB5C2je7HyStzBRvDWEjUJw+uI
Z9+RkvSQFV82tIvczGzGuLkMM1of+M+VROGeDXyP9tzyjD3GrqDwwdcXFz/dVnhF
ktFiQeoMlfDcSjbcXztRaD4eRSM/EzK6aNL7eocK+s9EWn10Xvg6c+7IeYxMgy32
w9Q9WRFN/Gzmeawb0rNNiYdhEq/ufBpfN1+Un4XrpqPukydbv2JpaiG/VZBzldkw
UMepC/mpRx8HPw==
=yaww
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
commit 6ca8f2e20bd1ced8a7cd12b3ae4b1ceca85cfc2b
Author: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Date: Fri Apr 26 13:08:58 2024 +0200
selftests: kselftest: also use strerror() on nolibc
nolibc gained an implementation of strerror() recently.
Use it and drop the ifdeffery.
Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
index 76c2a6945d3e..b8967b6e29d5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
@@ -168,15 +168,7 @@ static inline __printf(1, 2) void ksft_print_msg(const char *msg, ...)
static inline void ksft_perror(const char *msg)
{
-#ifndef NOLIBC
ksft_print_msg("%s: %s (%d)\n", msg, strerror(errno), errno);
-#else
- /*
- * nolibc doesn't provide strerror() and it seems
- * inappropriate to add one, just print the errno.
- */
- ksft_print_msg("%s: %d)\n", msg, errno);
-#endif
}
static inline __printf(1, 2) void ksft_test_result_pass(const char *msg, ...)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] nolibc for 6.11-rc1
2024-07-14 16:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
@ 2024-07-15 7:00 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-07-15 15:50 ` Shuah Khan
2024-07-15 21:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Weißschuh @ 2024-07-15 7:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul E. McKenney; +Cc: Shuah Khan, Willy Tarreau, linux-kernel
On 2024-07-14 09:44:55+0000, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 10:09:13AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > On 2024-07-12 20:16:13+0000, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 09:06:39AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 01:04:08PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > > > Hi Paul,
> > > > >
> > > > > The following changes since commit f2661062f16b2de5d7b6a5c42a9a5c96326b8454:
> > > > >
> > > > > Linux 6.10-rc5 (2024-06-23 17:08:54 -0400)
> > > > >
> > > > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git tags/nolibc-20240629-for-6.11-1
> > > > >
> > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 6ca8f2e20bd1ced8a7cd12b3ae4b1ceca85cfc2b:
> > > > >
> > > > > selftests: kselftest: also use strerror() on nolibc (2024-06-29 09:44:58 +0200)
> > > >
> > > > Hearing no objections, I have pulled this in so that it will appear
> > > > in the next -next. Here are the test results:
> > > >
> > > > make run:
> > > > 195 test(s): 195 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success
> > > >
> > > > make run-user:
> > > > 195 test(s): 193 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning
> > > >
> > > > So looks good to me!
> >
> > For testing you can use "./run-tests.sh -m [user | system]" to run the
> > tests on all supported architectures via QEMU.
> >
> > (On the first run you can use "-p" to download the toolchains)
>
> Thank you for the info!
>
> My near-term plan is that I do a smoke test on x86 (or whatever I am
> running), and let you guys cover the various architectures. Longer
> term, I might get more into cross-architecture work.
I'll try to remember to add the full testreport for future
pullrequests, too.
> > > And please see below for my proposed signed tag. Please let me know of
> > > any needed adjustments.
> > >
> > > Thanx, Paul
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > tag nolibc.2024.07.12a
> > > Tagger: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > > Date: Fri Jul 12 16:56:21 2024 -0700
> > >
> > > nolibc updates for v6.11
> > >
> > > o Fix selftest printf format mismatch in expect_str_buf_eq()
> >
> > Period at the end.
>
> Good eyes, thank you, fixed.
>
> > > o Stop using brk() and sbrk() when testing against musl, which
> > > implements these two functions with ENOMEM.
> > >
> > > o Make tests us -Werror to force failure on compiler warnings.
> > >
> > > o Add limits for the {u,}intmax_t, ulong and {u,}llong types.
> > >
> > > o Implement strtol() and friends.
> > >
> > > o Add facility to skip nolibc-specific tests when running against
> > > non-nolibc libraries.
> > >
> > > o Implement strerror().
> > >
> > > o Use strerror() unconditionally, instead of only when running
> > > against non-nolibc libraries.
> >
> > Maybe mention that this is about kselftest and not nolibc itself.
> >
> > Otherwise looks good, thanks!
>
> Thank you for looking this over, and does the updated version below
> cover this? If I am still off, please suggest updates.
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> tag nolibc.2024.07.14a
> Tagger: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Date: Sun Jul 14 09:07:29 2024 -0700
>
> nolibc updates for v6.11
>
> o Fix selftest printf format mismatch in expect_str_buf_eq().
>
> o Stop using brk() and sbrk() when testing against musl, which
> implements these two functions with ENOMEM.
>
> o Make tests use -Werror to force failure on compiler warnings.
>
> o Add limits for the {u,}intmax_t, ulong and {u,}llong types.
>
> o Implement strtol() and friends.
>
> o Add facility to skip nolibc-specific tests when running against
> non-nolibc libraries.
>
> o Implement strerror().
>
> o Use strerror() unconditionally, instead of only when running
> kselftest.
"Also use strerror() on nolibc when running kselftests."
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQJHBAABCgAxFiEEbK7UrM+RBIrCoViJnr8S83LZ+4wFAmaT98oTHHBhdWxtY2tA
> a2VybmVsLm9yZwAKCRCevxLzctn7jHc0D/9chhJo+QQ+2V+xQEKT8n1MKiJaf55X
> EUhIlKHoejrF7rZukqv1tcqMNP0wGzwKyttbFkX+72OHrxSuNr0MbvBjQi6cFcFo
> 2QNg/ZEVIZKeMJzRXwUOOrg47hwLoGgFrt5cgSCMeYSm0E25oAx752/WbmQgQBlU
> 2dOTomrxF7pyDQoJwPU3CNAk/fFZHuBX9Hjp0LPaXmKDq9BLWqUWoJZAOAfcxm2Q
> F8A/HnOTEp5F5qwJLr0GStNxR44xH/GU/3KEdryzllEFj6PTLDAeP4oNdMK30q9F
> YGrcpON3hjw1+XKQBTLJ/UIqQ3EeA/bo2yDOLsFZObU7aKrb7ewtxTq/DWUfoj4x
> jfFCOc6JpsmAAlwm2zXn+MLDLxSF3QhTalpl1o4thrNgxhm/Eou+uz/1k2EREp/r
> 4PfHC+i0YjGA9sJ12u1hUoPkxHXY0GKx+gHL9uwB5C2je7HyStzBRvDWEjUJw+uI
> Z9+RkvSQFV82tIvczGzGuLkMM1of+M+VROGeDXyP9tzyjD3GrqDwwdcXFz/dVnhF
> ktFiQeoMlfDcSjbcXztRaD4eRSM/EzK6aNL7eocK+s9EWn10Xvg6c+7IeYxMgy32
> w9Q9WRFN/Gzmeawb0rNNiYdhEq/ufBpfN1+Un4XrpqPukydbv2JpaiG/VZBzldkw
> UMepC/mpRx8HPw==
> =yaww
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> commit 6ca8f2e20bd1ced8a7cd12b3ae4b1ceca85cfc2b
> Author: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
> Date: Fri Apr 26 13:08:58 2024 +0200
>
> selftests: kselftest: also use strerror() on nolibc
>
> nolibc gained an implementation of strerror() recently.
> Use it and drop the ifdeffery.
>
> Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
> index 76c2a6945d3e..b8967b6e29d5 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
> @@ -168,15 +168,7 @@ static inline __printf(1, 2) void ksft_print_msg(const char *msg, ...)
>
> static inline void ksft_perror(const char *msg)
> {
> -#ifndef NOLIBC
> ksft_print_msg("%s: %s (%d)\n", msg, strerror(errno), errno);
> -#else
> - /*
> - * nolibc doesn't provide strerror() and it seems
> - * inappropriate to add one, just print the errno.
> - */
> - ksft_print_msg("%s: %d)\n", msg, errno);
> -#endif
> }
>
> static inline __printf(1, 2) void ksft_test_result_pass(const char *msg, ...)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] nolibc for 6.11-rc1
2024-07-15 7:00 ` Thomas Weißschuh
@ 2024-07-15 15:50 ` Shuah Khan
2024-07-15 21:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-07-15 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Weißschuh, Paul E. McKenney
Cc: Willy Tarreau, linux-kernel, Shuah Khan
On 7/15/24 01:00, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2024-07-14 09:44:55+0000, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 10:09:13AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>>> On 2024-07-12 20:16:13+0000, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 09:06:39AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 01:04:08PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Paul,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The following changes since commit f2661062f16b2de5d7b6a5c42a9a5c96326b8454:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Linux 6.10-rc5 (2024-06-23 17:08:54 -0400)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git tags/nolibc-20240629-for-6.11-1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 6ca8f2e20bd1ced8a7cd12b3ae4b1ceca85cfc2b:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> selftests: kselftest: also use strerror() on nolibc (2024-06-29 09:44:58 +0200)
>>>>>
>>>>> Hearing no objections, I have pulled this in so that it will appear
>>>>> in the next -next. Here are the test results:
>>>>>
>>>>> make run:
>>>>> 195 test(s): 195 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success
>>>>>
>>>>> make run-user:
>>>>> 195 test(s): 193 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning
>>>>>
>>>>> So looks good to me!
>>>
>>> For testing you can use "./run-tests.sh -m [user | system]" to run the
>>> tests on all supported architectures via QEMU.
>>>
>>> (On the first run you can use "-p" to download the toolchains)
>>
>> Thank you for the info!
>>
>> My near-term plan is that I do a smoke test on x86 (or whatever I am
>> running), and let you guys cover the various architectures. Longer
>> term, I might get more into cross-architecture work.
>
Thank for fielding this time. Next one in on me.
> I'll try to remember to add the full testreport for future
> pullrequests, too.
>
Thanks - that will be great.
I run the nolibc tests before I send PR - I also compare to see if my
results match with yours.
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [GIT PULL] nolibc for 6.11-rc1
2024-07-15 7:00 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-07-15 15:50 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2024-07-15 21:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2024-07-15 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Weißschuh; +Cc: Shuah Khan, Willy Tarreau, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 09:00:55AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2024-07-14 09:44:55+0000, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 10:09:13AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > On 2024-07-12 20:16:13+0000, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 09:06:39AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2024 at 01:04:08PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Paul,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The following changes since commit f2661062f16b2de5d7b6a5c42a9a5c96326b8454:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Linux 6.10-rc5 (2024-06-23 17:08:54 -0400)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nolibc/linux-nolibc.git tags/nolibc-20240629-for-6.11-1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 6ca8f2e20bd1ced8a7cd12b3ae4b1ceca85cfc2b:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > selftests: kselftest: also use strerror() on nolibc (2024-06-29 09:44:58 +0200)
> > > > >
> > > > > Hearing no objections, I have pulled this in so that it will appear
> > > > > in the next -next. Here are the test results:
> > > > >
> > > > > make run:
> > > > > 195 test(s): 195 passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed => status: success
> > > > >
> > > > > make run-user:
> > > > > 195 test(s): 193 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning
> > > > >
> > > > > So looks good to me!
> > >
> > > For testing you can use "./run-tests.sh -m [user | system]" to run the
> > > tests on all supported architectures via QEMU.
> > >
> > > (On the first run you can use "-p" to download the toolchains)
> >
> > Thank you for the info!
> >
> > My near-term plan is that I do a smoke test on x86 (or whatever I am
> > running), and let you guys cover the various architectures. Longer
> > term, I might get more into cross-architecture work.
>
> I'll try to remember to add the full testreport for future
> pullrequests, too.
>
> > > > And please see below for my proposed signed tag. Please let me know of
> > > > any needed adjustments.
> > > >
> > > > Thanx, Paul
> > > >
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > tag nolibc.2024.07.12a
> > > > Tagger: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > > > Date: Fri Jul 12 16:56:21 2024 -0700
> > > >
> > > > nolibc updates for v6.11
> > > >
> > > > o Fix selftest printf format mismatch in expect_str_buf_eq()
> > >
> > > Period at the end.
> >
> > Good eyes, thank you, fixed.
> >
> > > > o Stop using brk() and sbrk() when testing against musl, which
> > > > implements these two functions with ENOMEM.
> > > >
> > > > o Make tests us -Werror to force failure on compiler warnings.
> > > >
> > > > o Add limits for the {u,}intmax_t, ulong and {u,}llong types.
> > > >
> > > > o Implement strtol() and friends.
> > > >
> > > > o Add facility to skip nolibc-specific tests when running against
> > > > non-nolibc libraries.
> > > >
> > > > o Implement strerror().
> > > >
> > > > o Use strerror() unconditionally, instead of only when running
> > > > against non-nolibc libraries.
> > >
> > > Maybe mention that this is about kselftest and not nolibc itself.
> > >
> > > Otherwise looks good, thanks!
> >
> > Thank you for looking this over, and does the updated version below
> > cover this? If I am still off, please suggest updates.
> >
> > Thanx, Paul
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > tag nolibc.2024.07.14a
> > Tagger: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > Date: Sun Jul 14 09:07:29 2024 -0700
> >
> > nolibc updates for v6.11
> >
> > o Fix selftest printf format mismatch in expect_str_buf_eq().
> >
> > o Stop using brk() and sbrk() when testing against musl, which
> > implements these two functions with ENOMEM.
> >
> > o Make tests use -Werror to force failure on compiler warnings.
> >
> > o Add limits for the {u,}intmax_t, ulong and {u,}llong types.
> >
> > o Implement strtol() and friends.
> >
> > o Add facility to skip nolibc-specific tests when running against
> > non-nolibc libraries.
> >
> > o Implement strerror().
> >
> > o Use strerror() unconditionally, instead of only when running
> > kselftest.
>
> "Also use strerror() on nolibc when running kselftests."
Very good, substituted your description for mine, thank you!
Thanx, Paul
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > iQJHBAABCgAxFiEEbK7UrM+RBIrCoViJnr8S83LZ+4wFAmaT98oTHHBhdWxtY2tA
> > a2VybmVsLm9yZwAKCRCevxLzctn7jHc0D/9chhJo+QQ+2V+xQEKT8n1MKiJaf55X
> > EUhIlKHoejrF7rZukqv1tcqMNP0wGzwKyttbFkX+72OHrxSuNr0MbvBjQi6cFcFo
> > 2QNg/ZEVIZKeMJzRXwUOOrg47hwLoGgFrt5cgSCMeYSm0E25oAx752/WbmQgQBlU
> > 2dOTomrxF7pyDQoJwPU3CNAk/fFZHuBX9Hjp0LPaXmKDq9BLWqUWoJZAOAfcxm2Q
> > F8A/HnOTEp5F5qwJLr0GStNxR44xH/GU/3KEdryzllEFj6PTLDAeP4oNdMK30q9F
> > YGrcpON3hjw1+XKQBTLJ/UIqQ3EeA/bo2yDOLsFZObU7aKrb7ewtxTq/DWUfoj4x
> > jfFCOc6JpsmAAlwm2zXn+MLDLxSF3QhTalpl1o4thrNgxhm/Eou+uz/1k2EREp/r
> > 4PfHC+i0YjGA9sJ12u1hUoPkxHXY0GKx+gHL9uwB5C2je7HyStzBRvDWEjUJw+uI
> > Z9+RkvSQFV82tIvczGzGuLkMM1of+M+VROGeDXyP9tzyjD3GrqDwwdcXFz/dVnhF
> > ktFiQeoMlfDcSjbcXztRaD4eRSM/EzK6aNL7eocK+s9EWn10Xvg6c+7IeYxMgy32
> > w9Q9WRFN/Gzmeawb0rNNiYdhEq/ufBpfN1+Un4XrpqPukydbv2JpaiG/VZBzldkw
> > UMepC/mpRx8HPw==
> > =yaww
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > commit 6ca8f2e20bd1ced8a7cd12b3ae4b1ceca85cfc2b
> > Author: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
> > Date: Fri Apr 26 13:08:58 2024 +0200
> >
> > selftests: kselftest: also use strerror() on nolibc
> >
> > nolibc gained an implementation of strerror() recently.
> > Use it and drop the ifdeffery.
> >
> > Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
> > index 76c2a6945d3e..b8967b6e29d5 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
> > @@ -168,15 +168,7 @@ static inline __printf(1, 2) void ksft_print_msg(const char *msg, ...)
> >
> > static inline void ksft_perror(const char *msg)
> > {
> > -#ifndef NOLIBC
> > ksft_print_msg("%s: %s (%d)\n", msg, strerror(errno), errno);
> > -#else
> > - /*
> > - * nolibc doesn't provide strerror() and it seems
> > - * inappropriate to add one, just print the errno.
> > - */
> > - ksft_print_msg("%s: %d)\n", msg, errno);
> > -#endif
> > }
> >
> > static inline __printf(1, 2) void ksft_test_result_pass(const char *msg, ...)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-07-15 21:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-06-29 11:04 [GIT PULL] nolibc for 6.11-rc1 Thomas Weißschuh
2024-06-30 16:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-07-13 3:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-07-14 4:57 ` Willy Tarreau
2024-07-14 15:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-07-14 8:09 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-07-14 16:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-07-15 7:00 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-07-15 15:50 ` Shuah Khan
2024-07-15 21:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.