From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>,
cristian.marussi@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, johan@kernel.org,
konradybcio@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Skip adding bad duplicates
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 17:20:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZtiI0u0nAUbWEAAR@pluto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZtiG7YLcnOR9IIuE@bogus>
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 05:12:29PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 08:43:24AM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> > Ensure that the bad duplicates reported by the platform firmware doesn't
> > get added to the opp-tables.
> >
>
> I am really interested to know if the platform firmware is presenting
> duplicates intentionally for some unknown reasons and we are just speculating
> it to be broken firmware or is it really broken firmware.
>
> For me, it is very hard to digest something like OPP tables which is there
> for a very long time now is not very well understood by firmware authors.
> How many duplicates are we seeing on this platform really ? If it is
> just one I can understand. More than one is hard to miss from the OPP
> tables in the firmware.
>
> While I am not opposing to make the driver handle these duplicates,
> I am just worried if they are put there intentionally for reasons we
> don't understand yet or not published.
>
The number of duplicates reported in logs makes me suspect the same...seems
like intentional/by_design .... but at first I stick to the general issue
of handling bad fw replies and how to survive kernel side at first...but I
indeed share your same concerns...
Thanks,
Cristian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-04 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-04 3:13 [PATCH V2 0/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Misc Fixes Sibi Sankar
2024-09-04 3:13 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Ensure that the message-id supports fastchannel Sibi Sankar
2024-09-04 7:00 ` Johan Hovold
2024-09-04 11:29 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-04 12:38 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-09-04 14:20 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-09-05 12:54 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-10-07 6:46 ` Sibi Sankar
2024-09-04 3:13 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Skip adding bad duplicates Sibi Sankar
2024-09-04 7:09 ` Johan Hovold
2024-09-04 8:05 ` Johan Hovold
2024-09-04 13:56 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-04 14:00 ` Konrad Dybcio
2024-09-04 15:21 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-09-04 15:30 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-09-04 15:46 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-09-05 12:43 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-10-07 7:00 ` Sibi Sankar
2024-10-09 14:20 ` Cristian Marussi
2024-09-04 16:12 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-09-04 16:20 ` Cristian Marussi [this message]
2024-10-07 6:51 ` Sibi Sankar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZtiI0u0nAUbWEAAR@pluto \
--to=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_sibis@quicinc.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.