Re: [PATCH RFC v3 1/2] mm: Add personality flag to limit address to 47 bits

[Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>]

On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 09:55:42AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2024, at 09:14, Guo Ren wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 3:18 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> >> It's also unclear to me how we want this flag to interact with
> >> the existing logic in arch_get_mmap_end(), which attempts to
> >> limit the default mapping to a 47-bit address space already.
> >
> > To optimize RISC-V progress, I recommend:
> >
> > Step 1: Approve the patch.
> > Step 2: Update Go and OpenJDK's RISC-V backend to utilize it.
> > Step 3: Wait approximately several iterations for Go & OpenJDK
> > Step 4: Remove the 47-bit constraint in arch_get_mmap_end()
> 
> I really want to first see a plausible explanation about why
> RISC-V can't just implement this using a 47-bit DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW
> like all the other major architectures (x86, arm64, powerpc64),

FWIW arm64 actually limits DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW to 48-bit in the default
configuration. We end up with a 47-bit with 16K pages but for a
different reason that has to do with LPA2 support (I doubt we need this
for the user mapping but we need to untangle some of the macros there;
that's for a separate discussion).

That said, we haven't encountered any user space problems with a 48-bit
DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW. So I also think RISC-V should follow a similar
approach (47 or 48 bit default limit). Better to have some ABI
consistency between architectures. One can still ask for addresses above
this default limit via mmap().

-- 
Catalin