From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, sesse@google.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@huawei.com>,
Guilherme Amadio <amadio@gentoo.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>,
Manu Bretelle <chantr4@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf build: Autodetect minimum required llvm-dev version
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 11:43:15 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZuBbAw2jbMwH91Az@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b2e813c4-be89-457d-8c38-38849177ec93@kernel.org>
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 03:27:16PM +0100, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> 2024-09-10 15:04 UTC+0100 ~ James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
> > The new LLVM addr2line feature requires a minimum version of 13 to
> > compile. Add a feature check for the version so that NO_LLVM=1 doesn't
> > need to be explicitly added. Leave the existing llvm feature check
> > intact because it's used by tools other than Perf.
> >
> > This fixes the following compilation error when the llvm-dev version
> > doesn't match:
> >
> > util/llvm-c-helpers.cpp: In function 'char* llvm_name_for_code(dso*, const char*, u64)':
> > util/llvm-c-helpers.cpp:178:21: error: 'std::remove_reference_t<llvm::DILineInfo>' {aka 'struct llvm::DILineInfo'} has no member named 'StartAddress'
> > 178 | addr, res_or_err->StartAddress ? *res_or_err->StartAddress : 0);
> >
> > Fixes: c3f8644c21df ("perf report: Support LLVM for addr2line()")
> > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > tools/build/Makefile.feature | 2 +-
> > tools/build/feature/Makefile | 9 +++++++++
> > tools/build/feature/test-llvm-perf.cpp | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > tools/perf/Makefile.config | 6 +++---
> > 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 tools/build/feature/test-llvm-perf.cpp
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/build/Makefile.feature b/tools/build/Makefile.feature
> > index 0717e96d6a0e..427a9389e26c 100644
> > --- a/tools/build/Makefile.feature
> > +++ b/tools/build/Makefile.feature
> > @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ FEATURE_DISPLAY ?= \
> > libunwind \
> > libdw-dwarf-unwind \
> > libcapstone \
> > - llvm \
> > + llvm-perf \
> Hi! Just a quick question, why remove "llvm" from the list, here?
Right, having it here is still interesting, if not for perf, for some
other tool in tools/ that uses this:
⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ cat tools/build/feature/test-llvm.cpp
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#include "llvm/Support/ManagedStatic.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#define NUM_VERSION (((LLVM_VERSION_MAJOR) << 16) + (LLVM_VERSION_MINOR << 8) + LLVM_VERSION_PATCH)
#if NUM_VERSION < 0x030900
# error "LLVM version too low"
#endif
int main()
{
llvm::errs() << "Hello World!\n";
llvm::llvm_shutdown();
return 0;
}
⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$
My understanding about James intention is that for perf we need at least
llvm-dev 13, but he kept the other feature test for other projects.
From Quentin, since this is in tools/build/Makefile.feature, so not perf
specific, maybe it should be somewhere else?
But keeping both in FEATURE_DISPLAY at tools/build/Makefile.feature
may be confusing?
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-10 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-10 14:04 [PATCH 1/2] perf build: Autodetect minimum required llvm-dev version James Clark
2024-09-10 14:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf build: Remove unused feature test target James Clark
2024-09-10 14:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf build: Autodetect minimum required llvm-dev version Quentin Monnet
2024-09-10 14:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2024-09-10 15:11 ` James Clark
2024-09-10 16:53 ` Quentin Monnet
2024-09-10 19:06 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-10 14:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZuBbAw2jbMwH91Az@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=amadio@gentoo.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=changbin.du@huawei.com \
--cc=chantr4@gmail.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qmo@kernel.org \
--cc=sesse@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.