From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, sesse@google.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@huawei.com>,
Guilherme Amadio <amadio@gentoo.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>,
Manu Bretelle <chantr4@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf build: Autodetect minimum required llvm-dev version
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:06:38 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZuCYvvjJZm3jSQux@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b60928c6-19c5-473c-8f13-532ed3fd3b3a@kernel.org>
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 05:53:16PM +0100, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> 2024-09-10 16:11 UTC+0100 ~ James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
> >
> >
> > On 9/10/24 15:27, Quentin Monnet wrote:
> > > 2024-09-10 15:04 UTC+0100 ~ James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
> > > > The new LLVM addr2line feature requires a minimum version of 13 to
> > > > compile. Add a feature check for the version so that NO_LLVM=1 doesn't
> > > > need to be explicitly added. Leave the existing llvm feature check
> > > > intact because it's used by tools other than Perf.
> > > >
> > > > This fixes the following compilation error when the llvm-dev version
> > > > doesn't match:
> > > >
> > > > util/llvm-c-helpers.cpp: In function 'char*
> > > > llvm_name_for_code(dso*, const char*, u64)':
> > > > util/llvm-c-helpers.cpp:178:21: error:
> > > > 'std::remove_reference_t<llvm::DILineInfo>' {aka 'struct
> > > > llvm::DILineInfo'} has no member named 'StartAddress'
> > > > 178 | addr, res_or_err->StartAddress ? *res_or_err-
> > > > >StartAddress : 0);
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: c3f8644c21df ("perf report: Support LLVM for addr2line()")
> > > > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > tools/build/Makefile.feature | 2 +-
> > > > tools/build/feature/Makefile | 9 +++++++++
> > > > tools/build/feature/test-llvm-perf.cpp | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > > > tools/perf/Makefile.config | 6 +++---
> > > > 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > create mode 100644 tools/build/feature/test-llvm-perf.cpp
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tools/build/Makefile.feature b/tools/build/Makefile.feature
> > > > index 0717e96d6a0e..427a9389e26c 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/build/Makefile.feature
> > > > +++ b/tools/build/Makefile.feature
> > > > @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ FEATURE_DISPLAY ?= \
> > > > libunwind \
> > > > libdw-dwarf-unwind \
> > > > libcapstone \
> > > > - llvm \
> > > > + llvm-perf \
> > >
> > > Hi! Just a quick question, why remove "llvm" from the list, here?
> > >
> > > Quentin
> >
> > Just because with respect to the linked fixes: commit, it wasn't
> > actually there before. It was added just for addr2line so it should
> > probably be llvm-perf rather than the generic one.
> >
> > But yes we can add llvm output if it's useful, but could probably be a
> > separate commit.
> It wasn't there before, but you're not removing the rest of the "llvm"
> feature, so I'd expect that part to stay as well? But I don't mind much. We
> use the "llvm" feature in bpftool, but beyond that, I don't personally need
> it to be displayed in tools/build/Makefile.feature, so no need to respin for
> that :)
My worry was that something were being removed because it wasn't being
used in tools/perf/ only to realize later that that was being used
somewhere else in tools/.
That is not the case as you reported, so going back to what we had
before the addr2line llvm code being introduced, i.e.:
commit c3f8644c21df9b7db97eb70e08e2826368aaafa0
Author: Steinar H. Gunderson <sesse@google.com>
Date: Sat Aug 3 17:20:06 2024 +0200
perf report: Support LLVM for addr2line()
Just did:
+++ b/tools/build/Makefile.feature
@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ FEATURE_DISPLAY ?= \
libunwind \
libdw-dwarf-unwind \
libcapstone \
+ llvm \
zlib \
lzma \
get_cpuid \
So just displaying whatever was detected, and now we display the new
llvm-perf, so that should be ok, probably even for bpftool, its just
requires a newer version of llvm-dev, right?
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-10 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-10 14:04 [PATCH 1/2] perf build: Autodetect minimum required llvm-dev version James Clark
2024-09-10 14:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf build: Remove unused feature test target James Clark
2024-09-10 14:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf build: Autodetect minimum required llvm-dev version Quentin Monnet
2024-09-10 14:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-09-10 15:11 ` James Clark
2024-09-10 16:53 ` Quentin Monnet
2024-09-10 19:06 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2024-09-10 14:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZuCYvvjJZm3jSQux@x1 \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=amadio@gentoo.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=changbin.du@huawei.com \
--cc=chantr4@gmail.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qmo@kernel.org \
--cc=sesse@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.