All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <Maarten@mblankhorst.nl>,
	<Lankhorst@mblankhorst.nl>, <dev@lankhorst.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] drm/xe/display: Use a single early init call for display
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 13:39:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZzOg5vyCXepW_t9n@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241107100140.292928-5-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 11:01:36AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Instead of 3 different calls, it should be safe to unify to a single
> call now. This makes the init sequence cleaner, and display less
> tangled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241105121857.17389-5-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst,,, <dev@lankhorst.se>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c | 72 +++++++------------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h |  8 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c          | 10 +---
>  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> index b5502f335f531..a9ce4f561e7aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.c

we should make every function in this file only a wrap to the i915
side with the 	if (!xe->info.probe_display) being the only thing
extra in here... so we consolidate the display side in a way
that we could later really split the display to a separate driver.

I have the feeling that this patch takes display to the other direction...

> @@ -100,31 +100,7 @@ int xe_display_create(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	return drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, display_destroy, NULL);
>  }
>  
> -static void xe_display_fini_nommio(struct drm_device *dev, void *dummy)
> -{
> -	struct xe_device *xe = to_xe_device(dev);
> -
> -	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
> -		return;
> -
> -	intel_power_domains_cleanup(xe);
> -}
> -
> -int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_device *xe)
> -{
> -	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	/* Fake uncore lock */
> -	spin_lock_init(&xe->uncore.lock);
> -
> -	/* This must be called before any calls to HAS_PCH_* */
> -	intel_detect_pch(xe);
> -
> -	return drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, xe_display_fini_nommio, xe);
> -}
> -
> -static void xe_display_fini_noirq(void *arg)
> +static void xe_display_fini_early(void *arg)
>  {
>  	struct xe_device *xe = arg;
>  	struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
> @@ -132,11 +108,13 @@ static void xe_display_fini_noirq(void *arg)
>  	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
>  		return;
>  
> +	intel_display_driver_remove_nogem(xe);
>  	intel_display_driver_remove_noirq(xe);
>  	intel_opregion_cleanup(display);
> +	intel_power_domains_cleanup(xe);
>  }
>  
> -int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe)
> +int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe)
>  {
>  	struct intel_display *display = &xe->display;
>  	int err;
> @@ -144,6 +122,12 @@ int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	/* Fake uncore lock */
> +	spin_lock_init(&xe->uncore.lock);
> +
> +	/* This must be called before any calls to HAS_PCH_* */
> +	intel_detect_pch(xe);
> +
>  	intel_display_driver_early_probe(xe);
>  
>  	/* Early display init.. */
> @@ -160,36 +144,20 @@ int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	intel_display_device_info_runtime_init(xe);
>  
>  	err = intel_display_driver_probe_noirq(xe);
> -	if (err) {
> -		intel_opregion_cleanup(display);
> -		return err;
> -	}
> -
> -	return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_display_fini_noirq, xe);
> -}
> -
> -static void xe_display_fini_noaccel(void *arg)
> -{
> -	struct xe_device *xe = arg;
> -
> -	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
> -		return;
> -
> -	intel_display_driver_remove_nogem(xe);
> -}
> -
> -int xe_display_init_noaccel(struct xe_device *xe)
> -{
> -	int err;
> -
> -	if (!xe->info.probe_display)
> -		return 0;
> +	if (err)
> +		goto err_opregion;
>  
>  	err = intel_display_driver_probe_nogem(xe);
>  	if (err)
> -		return err;
> +		goto err_noirq;
>  
> -	return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_display_fini_noaccel, xe);
> +	return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev, xe_display_fini_early, xe);
> +err_noirq:
> +	intel_display_driver_remove_noirq(xe);
> +	intel_power_domains_cleanup(xe);
> +err_opregion:
> +	intel_opregion_cleanup(display);
> +	return err;
>  }
>  
>  int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
> index 17afa537aee50..255cffa328160 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/xe_display.h
> @@ -20,9 +20,7 @@ int xe_display_create(struct xe_device *xe);
>  
>  int xe_display_probe(struct xe_device *xe);
>  
> -int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_device *xe);
> -int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe);
> -int xe_display_init_noaccel(struct xe_device *xe);
> +int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe);
>  int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe);
>  void xe_display_fini(struct xe_device *xe);
>  
> @@ -53,9 +51,7 @@ static inline int xe_display_create(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
>  
>  static inline int xe_display_probe(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
>  
> -static inline int xe_display_init_nommio(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
> -static inline int xe_display_init_noirq(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
> -static inline int xe_display_init_noaccel(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
> +static inline int xe_display_init_early(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
>  static inline int xe_display_init(struct xe_device *xe) { return 0; }
>  static inline void xe_display_fini(struct xe_device *xe) {}
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index b9948b2dc8d1d..f1147ebeeff31 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -632,10 +632,6 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
>  		return err;
>  
>  	xe->info.mem_region_mask = 1;
> -	err = xe_display_init_nommio(xe);
> -	if (err)
> -		return err;
> -
>  	err = xe_set_dma_info(xe);
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
> @@ -687,10 +683,6 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
>  
> -	err = xe_display_init_noirq(xe);
> -	if (err)
> -		return err;
> -
>  	err = probe_has_flat_ccs(xe);
>  	if (err)
>  		goto err;
> @@ -718,7 +710,7 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	 * This is the reason the first allocation needs to be done
>  	 * inside display.
>  	 */
> -	err = xe_display_init_noaccel(xe);
> +	err = xe_display_init_early(xe);
>  	if (err)
>  		goto err;
>  
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-12 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-07 10:01 [PATCH 1/9] drm/xe: Remove double pageflip Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-07 10:01 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/xe/display: Add intel_plane_initial_vblank_wait Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-07 11:36   ` [PATCH] " Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-07 12:21     ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-11-07 17:45       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-07 10:01 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/xe: Move suballocator init to after display init Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-12 18:18   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-11-07 10:01 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/xe: Defer irq init until after xe_display_init_noaccel Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-12 18:21   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-11-07 10:01 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/xe/display: Use a single early init call for display Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-12 18:39   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2024-11-13 10:30     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-14 16:05       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-11-07 10:01 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/xe/sriov: Move VF bootstrap and query_config to vf_guc_init Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-14 16:09   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-11-15 14:21     ` Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-15 19:06       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-11-15 19:50         ` Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-15 20:02           ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-11-15 20:51             ` Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-07 10:01 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/xe: Simplify GuC early initialisation Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-07 10:01 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/xe: Make it possible to read instance0 MCR registers after xe_gt_mcr_init_early Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-07 10:01 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/xe: Split init of xe_gt_init_hwconfig to xe_gt_init and *_early Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-07 10:08 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [1/9] drm/xe: Remove double pageflip Patchwork
2024-11-07 10:08 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-11-07 10:09 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-11-07 10:14 ` ✗ CI.Build: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-07 10:16 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: " Patchwork
2024-11-07 12:23 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/9] drm/xe: Remove double pageflip (rev2) Patchwork
2024-11-07 12:23 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning " Patchwork
2024-11-07 12:57 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success " Patchwork
2024-11-07 12:57 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-11-07 12:59 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-11-07 13:10 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-11-07 13:12 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-11-07 13:14 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-11-07 13:52 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-11-07 13:57 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2024-11-08 20:13 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-11-05 12:18 [PATCH 1/9] drm/xe: Remove double pageflip Maarten Lankhorst
2024-11-05 12:18 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/xe/display: Use a single early init call for display Maarten Lankhorst

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZzOg5vyCXepW_t9n@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=Lankhorst@mblankhorst.nl \
    --cc=Maarten@mblankhorst.nl \
    --cc=dev@lankhorst.se \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.