Re: [PATCH v1] fs/ext4/inode-test: KUnit test for ext4 inode.

[Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>]

Hi Iurii,

Thanks for the patch.

On 10/8/19 8:42 PM, Iurii Zaikin wrote:
> Note: this patch is intended to be applied against kselftest/test branch:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/log/?h=test
> 


This doesn't belong here. You can add it to commit header

[PATCH linux-kselftest/test] also you don't need v1 in there.

> KUnit tests for decoding extended 64 bit timestamps.

Please give more details on what these tests do. More information
on range of timestamps would be helpful. I see you have 2038 test
and it would be great to call out the ranges and conditions it is
resting.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>
> ---
>   fs/ext4/Kconfig      |  12 +++
>   fs/ext4/Makefile     |   1 +
>   fs/ext4/inode-test.c | 217 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 230 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 fs/ext4/inode-test.c
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/Kconfig b/fs/ext4/Kconfig
> index cbb5ca830e57..72c26abbce4c 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/ext4/Kconfig
> @@ -106,3 +106,15 @@ config EXT4_DEBUG
>     If you select Y here, then you will be able to turn on debugging
>     with a command such as:
>    echo 1 > /sys/module/ext4/parameters/mballoc_debug
> +
> +config EXT4_INODE_KUNIT_TEST
> + bool "KUnit test for ext4 inode"
> + depends on EXT4_FS
> + depends on KUNIT
> + help
> +  This builds the ext4 inode sysctl unit test, which runs on boot.
> +  Tests the encoding correctness of ext4 inode.
> +  For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general please refer
> +  to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/.
> +
> +  If unsure, say N.
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/Makefile b/fs/ext4/Makefile
> index b17ddc229ac5..1eeb8b449255 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/Makefile
> +++ b/fs/ext4/Makefile
> @@ -13,4 +13,5 @@ ext4-y := balloc.o bitmap.o block_validity.o dir.o
> ext4_jbd2.o extents.o \
> 
>   ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL) += acl.o
>   ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY) += xattr_security.o
> +ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_INODE_KUNIT_TEST) += inode-test.o
>   ext4-$(CONFIG_FS_VERITY) += verity.o
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode-test.c b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0ecb8dd5e0c5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

Follow the commenting style recommended in the coding-style doc.
/* ---- */

> +/*
> + * KUnit test of ext4 inode.
> + */
> +
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/time64.h>
> +
> +#include "ext4.h"
> +
> +// binary: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> +#define LOWER_MSB_0 0L
> +// binary: 01111111 11111111 11111111 11111111
> +#define UPPER_MSB_0 0x7fffffffL
> +// binary: 10000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> +#define LOWER_MSB_1 (-0x80000000L)
> +// binary: 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111
> +#define UPPER_MSB_1 (-1L)
> +
> +#define CASE_NAME_FORMAT "%s: msb:%x lower_bound:%x extra_bits: %x"
> +
> +struct timestamp_expectation {
> + const char *test_case_name;
> + struct timespec64 expected;
> + u32 extra_bits;
> + bool msb_set;
> + bool lower_bound;
> +};
> +
> +static time64_t get_32bit_time(const struct timestamp_expectation * const test)
> +{
> + if (test->msb_set) {
> + if (test->lower_bound)
> + return LOWER_MSB_1;
> +
> + return UPPER_MSB_1;
> + }

Can you add information on what you are trying to test.
Please do the same for all tests.

> +
> + if (test->lower_bound)
> + return LOWER_MSB_0;
> + return UPPER_MSB_0;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static void inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + const struct timestamp_expectation test_data[] = {
> + {
> + .test_case_name = "1901-12-13",
> + .msb_set = true,
> + .lower_bound = true,
> + .extra_bits = 0,
> + .expected = {.tv_sec = -0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> + },
> +

I see that you use the same tv_nsec for all tests. Is there
a reason for that? Would it be helpful to vary it?

> + {
> + .test_case_name = "1969-12-31",
> + .msb_set = true,
> + .lower_bound = false,
> + .extra_bits = 0,
> + .expected = {.tv_sec = -1LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> + },
> +
> + {
> + .test_case_name = "1970-01-01",
> + .msb_set = false,
> + .lower_bound = true,
> + .extra_bits = 0,
> + .expected = {0LL, 0L},
> + },
> +
> + {
> + .test_case_name = "2038-01-19",
> + .msb_set = false,
> + .lower_bound = false,
> + .extra_bits = 0,
> + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x7fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> + },
> +
> + {
> + .test_case_name = "2038-01-19",
> + .msb_set = true,
> + .lower_bound = true,
> + .extra_bits = 1,
> + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> + },
> +
> + {
> + .test_case_name = "2106-02-07",
> + .msb_set = true,
> + .lower_bound = false,
> + .extra_bits = 1,
> + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0xffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> + },
> +
> + {
> + .test_case_name = "2106-02-07",
> + .msb_set = false,
> + .lower_bound = true,
> + .extra_bits = 1,
> + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x100000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0LL},
> + },
> +
> + {
> + .test_case_name = "2174-02-25",
> + .msb_set = false,
> + .lower_bound = false,
> + .extra_bits = 1,
> + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x17fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> + },
> +
> + {
> + .test_case_name = "2174-02-25",
> + .msb_set = true,
> + .lower_bound = true,
> + .extra_bits =  2,
> + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x180000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> + },
> +
> + {
> + .test_case_name = "2242-03-16",
> + .msb_set = true,
> + .lower_bound = false,
> + .extra_bits = 2,
> + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x1ffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> + },
> +
> + {
> + .test_case_name = "2242-03-16",
> + .msb_set = false,
> + .lower_bound = true,
> + .extra_bits = 2,
> + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x200000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> + },
> +
> + {
> + .test_case_name = " 2310-04-04",
> + .msb_set = false,
> + .lower_bound = false,
> + .extra_bits = 2,
> + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x27fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> + },
> +

Get rid of this. Add it when you can add it later. I don't
like to see these TODOs with blocks of code commented out.

> + /* TODO: enable when legacy encoding in ext4.h is disabled.
> + *{
> + * .test_case_name = "2310-04-04",
> + * .msb_set = true,
> + * .lower_bound = true,
> + * .extra_bits = 3,
> + * .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x280000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> + *},
> + *
> + *{
> + * .test_case_name = "2378-04-22",
> + * .msb_set = true,
> + * .lower_bound = false,
> + * .extra_bits = 3,
> + * .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x2ffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> + * },
> + */
> +
> + {
> + .test_case_name = "2378-04-22",
> + .msb_set = false,
> + .lower_bound = true,
> + .extra_bits = 3,
> + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x300000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> + },
> +
> + {
> + .test_case_name = "2446-05-10",
> + .msb_set = false,
> + .lower_bound = false,
> + .extra_bits = 3,
> + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x37fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L},
> + }
> + };
> +
> + struct timespec64 timestamp;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data); ++i) {
> + timestamp.tv_sec = get_32bit_time(&test_data[i]);
> + ext4_decode_extra_time(&timestamp,
> +       cpu_to_le32(test_data[i].extra_bits));
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
> +    test_data[i].expected.tv_sec,
> +    timestamp.tv_sec,
> +    CASE_NAME_FORMAT,
> +    test_data[i].test_case_name,
> +    test_data[i].msb_set,
> +    test_data[i].lower_bound,
> +    test_data[i].extra_bits);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
> +    test_data[i].expected.tv_nsec,
> +    timestamp.tv_nsec,
> +    CASE_NAME_FORMAT,
> +    test_data[i].test_case_name,
> +    test_data[i].msb_set,
> +    test_data[i].lower_bound,
> +    test_data[i].extra_bits);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case ext4_inode_test_cases[] = {
> + KUNIT_CASE(inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding),
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite ext4_inode_test_suite = {
> + .name = "ext4_inode_test",
> + .test_cases = ext4_inode_test_cases,
> +};
> +
> +kunit_test_suite(ext4_inode_test_suite);
> --
> 2.23.0.700.g56cf767bdb-goog
> 

thanks,
-- Shuah