All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: psodagud@codeaurora.org (Sodagudi Prasad)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Schedule affinity_notify work while migrating IRQs during hot plug
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 09:12:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5b146bd9a36dd7b4fe2bc36cbaadade@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05102c455476941d37904f8c6f387452@codeaurora.org>

On 2017-02-21 12:59, Sodagudi Prasad wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> Currently irq_set_affinity() is called to migrate irqs from 
> migrate_one_irq()
> during cpu hot plug and clients which are interested to know the irq
> affinity change
> not getting notified
> 
> take_cpu_down () --> __cpu_disable() --> 
> irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu();
> 
> irq_set_affinity() is changing the IRQ affinity at chip level
> but it is not notifying the affinity_notify work.
> 

Hi Thomas and All,

I could see that in the 3.10 kernel irq affinity notifiers are getting 
called when a core getting hot plugged. But in later kernel versions api 
used to change
affinity was changed from irq_set_affinity_locked() to 
irq_do_set_affinity(), so irq notifiers are not getting called when a 
core hot plugged.
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/kernel/irq/manage.c?id=refs/tags/v3.10.105#n201


In latest kernel following path is executed to migrate IRQs.
irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu() --> migrate_one_irq() -> 
irq_do_set_affinity().

As I mentioned above, irq_set_affinity_locked() notifies all clients 
drivers, which are registered for IRQ affinity change but 
irq_do_set_affinity() API just changes the affinity at irq chip level 
but does not notify the clients drivers. I am not sure whether it is 
just a miss during IRQ framework refactor or intentionally done like 
this. Can you please check whether following code change make sense or 
not?

So I am thinking that, adding following sched_work() would notify 
clients.

diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 6b66959..5e4766b 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ int irq_do_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data, const 
struct cpumask *mask,
         case IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE:
                 cpumask_copy(desc->irq_common_data.affinity, mask);
         case IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY:
+               schedule_work(&desc->affinity_notify->work);
                 irq_set_thread_affinity(desc);
                 ret = 0;
         }


> How about below change, so that clients drivers gets notified about
> irq affinity changes?
> --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> @@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ int irq_do_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data,
> const struct cpumask *mask,
>         case IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE:
>                 cpumask_copy(desc->irq_common_data.affinity, mask);
>         case IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY:
> +               schedule_work(&desc->affinity_notify->work);
>                 irq_set_thread_affinity(desc);
>                 ret = 0;
> 
> With this change, notifications of IRQ affinity gets executed and 
> notified
> to client drivers.

-Thanks, Prasad
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora 
Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sodagudi Prasad <psodagud@codeaurora.org>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, james.morse@arm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com
Subject: Re: Schedule affinity_notify work while migrating IRQs during hot plug
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 09:12:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5b146bd9a36dd7b4fe2bc36cbaadade@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05102c455476941d37904f8c6f387452@codeaurora.org>

On 2017-02-21 12:59, Sodagudi Prasad wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> Currently irq_set_affinity() is called to migrate irqs from 
> migrate_one_irq()
> during cpu hot plug and clients which are interested to know the irq
> affinity change
> not getting notified
> 
> take_cpu_down () --> __cpu_disable() --> 
> irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu();
> 
> irq_set_affinity() is changing the IRQ affinity at chip level
> but it is not notifying the affinity_notify work.
> 

Hi Thomas and All,

I could see that in the 3.10 kernel irq affinity notifiers are getting 
called when a core getting hot plugged. But in later kernel versions api 
used to change
affinity was changed from irq_set_affinity_locked() to 
irq_do_set_affinity(), so irq notifiers are not getting called when a 
core hot plugged.
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/kernel/irq/manage.c?id=refs/tags/v3.10.105#n201


In latest kernel following path is executed to migrate IRQs.
irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu() --> migrate_one_irq() -> 
irq_do_set_affinity().

As I mentioned above, irq_set_affinity_locked() notifies all clients 
drivers, which are registered for IRQ affinity change but 
irq_do_set_affinity() API just changes the affinity at irq chip level 
but does not notify the clients drivers. I am not sure whether it is 
just a miss during IRQ framework refactor or intentionally done like 
this. Can you please check whether following code change make sense or 
not?

So I am thinking that, adding following sched_work() would notify 
clients.

diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 6b66959..5e4766b 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ int irq_do_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data, const 
struct cpumask *mask,
         case IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE:
                 cpumask_copy(desc->irq_common_data.affinity, mask);
         case IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY:
+               schedule_work(&desc->affinity_notify->work);
                 irq_set_thread_affinity(desc);
                 ret = 0;
         }


> How about below change, so that clients drivers gets notified about
> irq affinity changes?
> --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> @@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ int irq_do_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data,
> const struct cpumask *mask,
>         case IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE:
>                 cpumask_copy(desc->irq_common_data.affinity, mask);
>         case IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY:
> +               schedule_work(&desc->affinity_notify->work);
>                 irq_set_thread_affinity(desc);
>                 ret = 0;
> 
> With this change, notifications of IRQ affinity gets executed and 
> notified
> to client drivers.

-Thanks, Prasad
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora 
Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-27 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-21 20:59 Schedule affinity_notify work while migrating IRQs during hot plug Sodagudi Prasad
2017-02-21 20:59 ` Sodagudi Prasad
2017-02-27 17:12 ` Sodagudi Prasad [this message]
2017-02-27 17:12   ` Sodagudi Prasad
2017-02-27 17:21   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-27 17:21     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-13 19:43     ` Sodagudi Prasad
2017-03-13 19:43       ` Sodagudi Prasad
2017-03-13 20:19       ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-13 20:19         ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-17 10:51         ` Sodagudi Prasad
2017-03-17 10:51           ` Sodagudi Prasad
2017-03-17 13:18           ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-17 13:18             ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-20 16:36             ` Prasad Sodagudi
2017-03-20 16:36               ` Prasad Sodagudi
2017-03-20 16:36               ` [PATCH] genirq: Notify clients whenever there is change in affinity Prasad Sodagudi
2017-03-20 16:36                 ` Prasad Sodagudi
2017-03-23  2:33                 ` kbuild test robot
2017-03-23  2:33                   ` kbuild test robot
2017-03-23  6:18                 ` kbuild test robot
2017-03-23  6:18                   ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a5b146bd9a36dd7b4fe2bc36cbaadade@codeaurora.org \
    --to=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.