From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Check if 52-bits PA is enabled
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:53:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a676f540d19fba2468fd1a801948826a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <333451bd-4730-4ebb-f76c-28fa5d0e1f7d@redhat.com>
On 2020-10-25 22:23, Gavin Shan wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 10/25/20 8:52 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 01:27:37 +0100,
>> Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The 52-bits physical address is disabled until
>>> CONFIG_ARM64_PA_BITS_52
>>> is chosen. This uses option for that check, to avoid the
>>> unconditional
>>> check on PAGE_SHIFT in the hot path and thus save some CPU cycles.
>>
>> PAGE_SHIFT is known at compile time, and this code is dropped by the
>> compiler if the selected page size is not 64K. This patch really only
>> makes the code slightly less readable and the "CPU cycles" argument
>> doesn't hold at all.
>>
>> So what are you trying to solve exactly?
>>
>
> There are two points covered by the patch: (1) The 52-bits physical
> address
> is visible only when CONFIG_ARM64_PA_BITS_52 is enabled in arch/arm64
> code.
> The code looks consistent with this option used here. (2) I had the
> assumption
> that gcc doesn't optimize the code and PAGE_SHIFT is always checked in
> order
> to get higher 4 physical address bits, but you said gcc should optimize
> the
> code accordingly. However, it would be still nice to make the code
> explicit.
Conditional compilation only results in more breakages, specially for
configs
that hardly anyone uses (big-endian and 64K pages are the two that
bitrot very
quickly).
So if anything can build without #ifdef, I'll take that anytime. If the
compiler
doesn't optimize it away, let's fix the compiler.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
will@kernel.org, alexandru.elisei@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Check if 52-bits PA is enabled
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:53:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a676f540d19fba2468fd1a801948826a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <333451bd-4730-4ebb-f76c-28fa5d0e1f7d@redhat.com>
On 2020-10-25 22:23, Gavin Shan wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 10/25/20 8:52 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 01:27:37 +0100,
>> Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The 52-bits physical address is disabled until
>>> CONFIG_ARM64_PA_BITS_52
>>> is chosen. This uses option for that check, to avoid the
>>> unconditional
>>> check on PAGE_SHIFT in the hot path and thus save some CPU cycles.
>>
>> PAGE_SHIFT is known at compile time, and this code is dropped by the
>> compiler if the selected page size is not 64K. This patch really only
>> makes the code slightly less readable and the "CPU cycles" argument
>> doesn't hold at all.
>>
>> So what are you trying to solve exactly?
>>
>
> There are two points covered by the patch: (1) The 52-bits physical
> address
> is visible only when CONFIG_ARM64_PA_BITS_52 is enabled in arch/arm64
> code.
> The code looks consistent with this option used here. (2) I had the
> assumption
> that gcc doesn't optimize the code and PAGE_SHIFT is always checked in
> order
> to get higher 4 physical address bits, but you said gcc should optimize
> the
> code accordingly. However, it would be still nice to make the code
> explicit.
Conditional compilation only results in more breakages, specially for
configs
that hardly anyone uses (big-endian and 64K pages are the two that
bitrot very
quickly).
So if anything can build without #ifdef, I'll take that anytime. If the
compiler
doesn't optimize it away, let's fix the compiler.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-26 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-25 0:27 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: arm64: Failback on unsupported huge pages Gavin Shan
2020-10-25 0:27 ` Gavin Shan
2020-10-25 0:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Check if 52-bits PA is enabled Gavin Shan
2020-10-25 0:27 ` Gavin Shan
2020-10-25 9:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-25 9:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-25 22:23 ` Gavin Shan
2020-10-25 22:23 ` Gavin Shan
2020-10-26 8:40 ` Will Deacon
2020-10-26 8:40 ` Will Deacon
2020-10-26 8:53 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-10-26 8:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-26 22:48 ` Gavin Shan
2020-10-26 22:48 ` Gavin Shan
2020-10-25 0:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: Don't map PUD huge page if it's not available Gavin Shan
2020-10-25 0:27 ` Gavin Shan
2020-10-25 10:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-25 10:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-25 22:27 ` Gavin Shan
2020-10-25 22:27 ` Gavin Shan
2020-10-25 0:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: arm64: Failback on unsupported huge page sizes Gavin Shan
2020-10-25 0:27 ` Gavin Shan
2020-10-25 10:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-25 10:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-25 23:04 ` Gavin Shan
2020-10-25 23:04 ` Gavin Shan
2020-10-26 8:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-26 8:55 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a676f540d19fba2468fd1a801948826a@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.