Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] Add support for suppressing warning backtraces

From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	David Gow <davidgow@google.com>, Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Cc: "Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Alessandro Carminati" <acarmina@redhat.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Maíra Canal" <mcanal@igalia.com>,
	"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
	"Daniel Diaz" <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>,
	"Arthur Grillo" <arthurgrillo@riseup.net>,
	"Naresh Kamboju" <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Alessandro Carminati" <alessandro.carminati@gmail.com>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] Add support for suppressing warning backtraces
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:14:55 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a998f3fa-495c-4165-884a-a11c5cb61e96@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250313150505.cf1568bf7197a52a8ab302e6@linux-foundation.org>

On 3/13/25 16:05, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:31:12 -0700 Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 06:24:25PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, as with my prior review, I'm a fan of this. It makes a bunch of my
>>>> very noisy tests much easier to deal with.
>>>
>>> And for the record, we're also affected by this in DRM and would very
>>> much like to get it merged in one shape or another.
>>>
>>
>> I was unable to get maintainers of major architectures interested enough
>> to provide feedback, and did not see a path forward. Maybe Alessandro
>> has more success than me.
> 
> I'll put them into mm.git, to advance things a bit.

I haven't heard from kunit maintainers yet. This thread got lost
in inbox due to travel.

David/Brendan/Rae, Okay to take this series?

Andrew, Okay to take this through your tree - this needs merging.

thanks,
-- Shuah