All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Naman Jain <namjain@linux.microsoft.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: hv: Set irq_retrigger callback for the Hyper-V PCI MSI irqchip
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 16:56:27 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9d44162-3c90-44c8-aae7-4813678234a9@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728140427.714311F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>



On 7/28/2026 7:34 PM, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> 
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] The fix for dropped pending interrupts during CPU hot-unplug was missed in the sister Hyper-V root partition MSI domain.
> --
> 
> --- Patch [1]: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: hv: Set irq_retrigger callback for the Hyper-V PCI MSI irqchip ---
> commit b8b1c843c457dd145f0d360b44f4b1bf34bd8cf5
> Author: Naman Jain <namjain@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> PCI: hv: Set irq_retrigger callback for the Hyper-V PCI MSI irqchip
> 
> The Hyper-V vPCI MSI irqchip never installs an irq_retrigger() callback.
> On CPU hot-unplug fixup_irqs() migrates the interrupts which are affine to
> the outgoing CPU to a new target. As the Hyper-V PCI/MSI chip does not
> provide that callback, the pending interrupt is silently dropped, which
> can result in lost interrupts, stalls and "No irq handler for vector"
> messages.
> 
> Fixes: 4daace0d8ce85 ("PCI: hv: Add paravirtual PCI front-end for Microsoft Hyper-V VMs")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Suggested-by: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Naman Jain <namjain@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
>> index cfc8fa403dad6..89816a2bd7cd3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
>> @@ -2119,6 +2119,7 @@ static bool hv_pcie_init_dev_msi_info(struct device *dev, struct irq_domain *dom
>>   	info->ops->msi_prepare = hv_msi_prepare;
>>   
>>   	chip->irq_set_affinity = irq_chip_set_affinity_parent;
>> +	chip->irq_retrigger = irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy;
> 
> [Severity: High]
> This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the sister Hyper-V root
> partition MSI domain in arch/x86/hyperv/irqdomain.c also need this fix?
> 
> Looking at hv_init_dev_msi_info(), it appears to be missing the exact same
> callback initialization for the root partition's top-level irq_chip:
> 
> arch/x86/hyperv/irqdomain.c:hv_init_dev_msi_info() {
> 	...
> 	if (!msi_lib_init_dev_msi_info(dev, domain, real_parent, info))
> 		return false;
> 
> 	chip->flags |= IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE | IRQCHIP_MOVE_DEFERRED;
> 
> 	info->ops->msi_prepare = pci_msi_prepare;
> 
> 	return true;
> }
> 
> If a CPU is hot-unplugged while a device MSI interrupt is pending in its
> local APIC IRR, could fixup_irqs() fail to resend the pending interrupt
> to the new target CPU because this callback is NULL?
> 
> This could potentially lead to the same lost interrupts and I/O stalls
> described in this commit message, just in the root partition MSI domain
> instead of the guest paravirtual MSI domain.
> 
>>   
>>   	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86))
>>   		chip->flags |= IRQCHIP_MOVE_DEFERRED;
>>
> 

I am not planning to include this in this series, since this issue is 
not seen in root partition yet and I am not sure if it is applicable 
here. Second patch would anyways fix it going forward, but I am OK 
adding the change for this, if we need.

Regards,
Naman

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-30 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-28 13:51 [PATCH 0/3] x86/irq: Fix lost interrupts on CPU hot-unplug for Hyper-V PCI/MSI Naman Jain
2026-07-28 13:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI: hv: Set irq_retrigger callback for the Hyper-V PCI MSI irqchip Naman Jain
2026-07-28 14:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 11:26     ` Naman Jain [this message]
2026-08-03 18:05   ` Aditya Garg
2026-07-28 13:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/irq: Use irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy() in fixup_irqs() Naman Jain
2026-07-28 14:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 11:26     ` Naman Jain
2026-07-28 13:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/irq, iommu/amd, PCI: Drop redundant irq_retrigger inits Naman Jain
2026-07-28 13:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-04 12:16 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86/irq: Fix lost interrupts on CPU hot-unplug for Hyper-V PCI/MSI Shradha Gupta
2026-08-05  4:43   ` Naman Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a9d44162-3c90-44c8-aae7-4813678234a9@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=namjain@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.