All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* 1 Terabyte+ Disk Support?
@ 2002-04-17 22:39 bob dobalina
  2002-04-17 23:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
  2002-04-17 23:54 ` Alan Cox
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bob dobalina @ 2002-04-17 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Hello,

I am looking for someone who has experience using 1TB+ Disks with the Linux 
2.2.14-5 Kernel that comes standard with Redhat Linux 6.2. I am trying to 
determine the best way to patch a pile of Redhat 6.2 (zoot)systems to 
recognize 1Terabyte and larger disks. I am trying to directly attach 
1.5Terabyte (external) RAID arrays to these Redhat 6.2 systems via Ultra160 
SCSI adapters.

The RAID devices are external rackmount enclosures with their own hardware 
IDE->Ultra160 SCSI RAID Controller. They use 160 Gigabyte IDE drives 
internally in a RAID5 configuration w/ no hot spare. The units striped in 
this configuration present the host they are directly attached to with about 
1.5 Terabytes of storage as (1) Logical
disk. Neither Redhat 6.2 or 7.2 will see properly recognize this large of a 
disk. The dmesg see's the RAID on the SCSI chain, assigns it 'sdb' but 
claims it has a negative number of sectors, and im unable to fdisk the 
device.

The cut-off point for large disks in Redhat 6.2 and 7.2 appears to be around 
900 Gigabytes, I can get both Redhat 6.2 and 7.2 to see up to around 900 
gigs as 1 disk. I've heard about a 64-bit IO patch for an older 2.x.x 'pre8' 
release kernel but would like to know if theres a way to get this 
accomplished with Redhat 6.2/Kernel 2.2.14-5. Any insight into this problem 
would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks!

-Bobd


_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: 1 Terabyte+ Disk Support?
  2002-04-17 22:39 1 Terabyte+ Disk Support? bob dobalina
@ 2002-04-17 23:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
  2002-04-17 23:54 ` Alan Cox
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2002-04-17 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Followup to:  <F50W2lSYgCSrlrCv3wB00016f23@hotmail.com>
By author:    "bob dobalina" <mrdobalina@hotmail.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> 
> The cut-off point for large disks in Redhat 6.2 and 7.2 appears to be around 
> 900 Gigabytes, I can get both Redhat 6.2 and 7.2 to see up to around 900 
> gigs as 1 disk. I've heard about a 64-bit IO patch for an older 2.x.x 'pre8' 
> release kernel but would like to know if theres a way to get this 
> accomplished with Redhat 6.2/Kernel 2.2.14-5. Any insight into this problem 
> would be greatly appreciated!
> 

Upgrade to 2.4.18.

	-hpa
-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt	<amsp@zytor.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: 1 Terabyte+ Disk Support?
  2002-04-17 22:39 1 Terabyte+ Disk Support? bob dobalina
  2002-04-17 23:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
@ 2002-04-17 23:54 ` Alan Cox
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2002-04-17 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bob dobalina; +Cc: linux-kernel

> 2.2.14-5 Kernel that comes standard with Redhat Linux 6.2. I am trying to 
> determine the best way to patch a pile of Redhat 6.2 (zoot)systems to 
> recognize 1Terabyte and larger disks. I am trying to directly attach 
> 1.5Terabyte (external) RAID arrays to these Redhat 6.2 systems via Ultra160 
> SCSI adapters.

Split them into two arrays

> The cut-off point for large disks in Redhat 6.2 and 7.2 appears to be around 
> 900 Gigabytes, I can get both Redhat 6.2 and 7.2 to see up to around 900 
> gigs as 1 disk. I've heard about a 64-bit IO patch for an older 2.x.x 'pre8' 
> release kernel but would like to know if theres a way to get this 
> accomplished with Redhat 6.2/Kernel 2.2.14-5. Any insight into this problem 
> would be greatly appreciated!

Passing 1Tb wraps the block number in 32bit space. Fixing that to 2Tb has
been done and verified for a few controllers (Leonard Zubkoff did some 
work on that) for current 2.4. Doing it "right" is a 2.5 project.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-04-17 23:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-04-17 22:39 1 Terabyte+ Disk Support? bob dobalina
2002-04-17 23:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-04-17 23:54 ` Alan Cox

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.