All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless-next] wifi: mwifiex: Don't use %pK through printk
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 16:55:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAba8H-8KYZJeezS@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250417-restricted-pointers-wifi-v1-1-b79cdaae5579@linutronix.de>

On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 03:21:54PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> In the past %pK was preferable to %p as it would not leak raw pointer
> values into the kernel log.
> Since commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")
> the regular %p has been improved to avoid this issue.
> Furthermore, restricted pointers ("%pK") were never meant to be used
> through printk(). They can still unintentionally leak raw pointers or
> acquire sleeping looks in atomic contexts.
> 
> Switch to the regular pointer formatting which is safer and
> easier to reason about.
> There are still a few users of %pK left, but these use it through seq_file,
> for which its usage is safe.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>

FWIW:

Acked-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>

      reply	other threads:[~2025-04-21 23:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-17 13:21 [PATCH wireless-next] wifi: mwifiex: Don't use %pK through printk Thomas Weißschuh
2025-04-21 23:55 ` Brian Norris [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aAba8H-8KYZJeezS@google.com \
    --to=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
    --cc=francesco@dolcini.it \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.