[PATCH wireless-next] wifi: mwifiex: Don't use %pK through printk

[PATCH wireless-next] wifi: mwifiex: Don't use %pK through printk

[Thomas Weißschuh]

In the past %pK was preferable to %p as it would not leak raw pointer
values into the kernel log.
Since commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")
the regular %p has been improved to avoid this issue.
Furthermore, restricted pointers ("%pK") were never meant to be used
through printk(). They can still unintentionally leak raw pointers or
acquire sleeping looks in atomic contexts.

Switch to the regular pointer formatting which is safer and
easier to reason about.
There are still a few users of %pK left, but these use it through seq_file,
for which its usage is safe.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
---
This was originally part of
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250414-restricted-pointers-net-v1-0-12af0ce46cdd@linutronix.de/
---
 drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c
index dd2a42e732f2398892915e1a3ac88b7d3fb4ed3f..a760de191fce7340040b1bc74efb35cf52ce8368 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c
@@ -2971,7 +2971,7 @@ static int mwifiex_init_pcie(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
 		goto err_iomap2;
 	}
 
-	pr_notice("PCI memory map Virt0: %pK PCI memory map Virt2: %pK\n",
+	pr_notice("PCI memory map Virt0: %p PCI memory map Virt2: %p\n",
 		  card->pci_mmap, card->pci_mmap1);
 
 	ret = mwifiex_pcie_alloc_buffers(adapter);

---
base-commit: cfb2e2c57aef75a414c0f18445c7441df5bc13be
change-id: 20250417-restricted-pointers-wifi-27aca4f6dc2e

Best regards,
-- 
Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>

Re: [PATCH wireless-next] wifi: mwifiex: Don't use %pK through printk

[Brian Norris]

On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 03:21:54PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> In the past %pK was preferable to %p as it would not leak raw pointer
> values into the kernel log.
> Since commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")
> the regular %p has been improved to avoid this issue.
> Furthermore, restricted pointers ("%pK") were never meant to be used
> through printk(). They can still unintentionally leak raw pointers or
> acquire sleeping looks in atomic contexts.
> 
> Switch to the regular pointer formatting which is safer and
> easier to reason about.
> There are still a few users of %pK left, but these use it through seq_file,
> for which its usage is safe.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>

FWIW:

Acked-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>