From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@gentoo.org>,
Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] meson: prefer POSIX-specified shell path
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 13:52:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAt3Yc1NVZxsvSVX@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aAtopiMkJpF2RdjG@tapette.crustytoothpaste.net>
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 10:49:10AM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On 2025-04-25 at 05:47:45, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> > Meson detects the path of the target shell via `find_program("sh")`,
> > which essentially does a lookup via `PATH`. This may easily lead to a
> > subtly-broken Git distribution when the build host has its shell in a
> > non-standard location that the target host doesn't know about.
> >
> > Fix the issue by appending "/bin" to the custom program path, which
> > causes us to prefer "/bin/sh" over a `PATH` lookup. As this location is
> > specified by POSIX this should make us pick a better default shell path
> > on all POSIX-compliant systems.
>
> Can you provide a citation for that? I don't see that in the POSIX
> 1003.1-2024 directory structure document[0]. More specifically, I think
> there are some proprietary Unix systems where `/bin/sh` is the original
> Bourne shell and is not POSIX compliant and some other path is the
> POSIX-compliant `sh`.
Hrmpf, you're right. I feel like I relearn this piece of trivia every
couple years. POSIX is quite specific here:
Applications should note that the standard PATH to the shell cannot
be assumed to be either /bin/sh or /usr/bin/sh, and should be
determined by interrogation of the PATH returned by getconf PATH ,
ensuring that the returned pathname is an absolute pathname and not
a shell built-in.
Anyway, given the following...
> I'll also point out that we require more than POSIX compliance in that
> we require `local`, so even if `/bin/sh` is POSIX compliant, that
> doesn't mean that it's suitable for Git. `/bin/sh` meets our needs on
> all the Linux distros I'm aware of, plus the BSDs, but if it were AT&T
> ksh, that would not meet our needs since it doesn't support `local`,
> even though it's POSIX compliant.
... prefering "/bin/sh" is still the right thing to do as it tends to
work on most systems supported by us, even though it's non-POSIX. But in
any case, the commit message needs to be adjusted.
Thanks!
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-25 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-24 13:38 [PATCH 0/2] meson: prefer '/bin/sh' over PATH lookup Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-24 13:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] meson: report detected runtime executable paths Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-25 0:45 ` Eli Schwartz
2025-04-25 5:21 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-25 16:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-24 13:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] meson: prefer POSIX-specified shell path Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-24 20:18 ` Justin Tobler
2025-04-25 5:21 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-24 18:28 ` [PATCH 0/2] meson: prefer '/bin/sh' over PATH lookup Junio C Hamano
2025-04-25 5:21 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-25 5:47 ` [PATCH v2 " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-25 5:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] meson: report detected runtime executable paths Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-25 8:27 ` Toon Claes
2025-04-25 5:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] meson: prefer POSIX-specified shell path Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-25 8:35 ` Toon Claes
2025-04-25 10:49 ` brian m. carlson
2025-04-25 11:52 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2025-04-25 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] meson: prefer '/bin/sh' over PATH lookup Toon Claes
2025-04-25 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-25 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] meson: report detected runtime executable paths Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-25 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] meson: prefer shell at "/bin/sh" Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-25 17:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-25 18:07 ` Eli Schwartz
2025-04-25 18:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-25 22:21 ` Eli Schwartz
2025-04-25 20:10 ` brian m. carlson
2025-04-25 22:25 ` Eli Schwartz
2025-04-25 20:13 ` brian m. carlson
2025-05-02 21:16 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] meson: prefer '/bin/sh' over PATH lookup Junio C Hamano
2025-05-02 22:37 ` Eli Schwartz
2025-05-05 6:08 ` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aAt3Yc1NVZxsvSVX@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=eschwartz@gentoo.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jltobler@gmail.com \
--cc=ps.report@gmx.net \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.