From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Seyi Kuforiji <kuforiji98@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] t/unit-tests: adapt lib-reftable{c,h} helper functions to clar
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 11:57:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBSXJcT8REHWrsrx@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250429175302.23724-11-kuforiji98@gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 06:53:02PM +0100, Seyi Kuforiji wrote:
> Helper functions defined in `t/unit-tests/lib-reftable.{c,h}` are
> required for the reftable-related test files to run efficeintly. In the
> current implementation these functions are designed to conform with our
> homegrown unit-testing structure. So in other to convert the reftable
> test files, there is need for a clar specific implementation of these
> helper functions.
>
> type cast `for (size_t i = 0; i < (size_t)stats->ref_stats.blocks; i++)`
> Adapt functions in lib-reftable.{c,h} to use clar. These functions
> conform with the clar testing framework and become available for all
> reftable-related test files implemented using the clar testing
> framework, which requires them. This change migrates the helper
> functions back into `lib-reftable.{c,h}`.
>
> Signed-off-by: Seyi Kuforiji <kuforiji98@gmail.com>
> ---
> Makefile | 4 +-
> t/meson.build | 4 +-
> t/unit-tests/lib-reftable.c | 26 +++++------
> t/unit-tests/lib-reftable.h | 6 +--
> t/unit-tests/unit-test.c | 93 -------------------------------------
> t/unit-tests/unit-test.h | 16 -------
> 6 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 0b42893611..7e646e16ee 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -1379,12 +1379,12 @@ CLAR_TEST_SUITES += u-urlmatch-normalization
> CLAR_TEST_PROG = $(UNIT_TEST_BIN)/unit-tests$(X)
> CLAR_TEST_OBJS = $(patsubst %,$(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/%.o,$(CLAR_TEST_SUITES))
> CLAR_TEST_OBJS += $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/clar/clar.o
> -CLAR_TEST_OBJS += $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/unit-test.o
> CLAR_TEST_OBJS += $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/lib-oid.o
> +CLAR_TEST_OBJS += $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/lib-reftable.o
> +CLAR_TEST_OBJS += $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/unit-test.o
>
> UNIT_TEST_PROGS = $(patsubst %,$(UNIT_TEST_BIN)/%$X,$(UNIT_TEST_PROGRAMS))
> UNIT_TEST_OBJS += $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/test-lib.o
> -UNIT_TEST_OBJS += $(UNIT_TEST_DIR)/lib-reftable.o
>
`UNIT_TEST_PROGS` only contains the "unit-test" binary now, right? Does
this mean that we can simplify build rules in our Makefile now?
> diff --git a/t/meson.build b/t/meson.build
> index 8fa00fc9ef..7c305a90b5 100644
> --- a/t/meson.build
> +++ b/t/meson.build
> @@ -26,8 +26,9 @@ clar_test_suites = [
>
> clar_sources = [
> 'unit-tests/clar/clar.c',
> + 'unit-tests/lib-oid.c',
> + 'unit-tests/lib-reftable.c',
> 'unit-tests/unit-test.c',
> - 'unit-tests/lib-oid.c'
> ]
>
> clar_decls_h = custom_target(
> @@ -69,7 +70,6 @@ foreach unit_test_program : unit_test_programs
> unit_test = executable(unit_test_name,
> sources: [
> 'unit-tests/test-lib.c',
> - 'unit-tests/lib-reftable.c',
> unit_test_program,
> ],
> dependencies: [libgit_commonmain],
Can't we remove this completely? `unit_test_programs` is empty now, so
this loop is a no-op now.
> diff --git a/t/unit-tests/lib-reftable.h b/t/unit-tests/lib-reftable.h
> index e4c360fa7e..2958db5dc0 100644
> --- a/t/unit-tests/lib-reftable.h
> +++ b/t/unit-tests/lib-reftable.h
> @@ -6,12 +6,12 @@
>
> struct reftable_buf;
>
> -void t_reftable_set_hash(uint8_t *p, int i, enum reftable_hash id);
> +void cl_reftable_set_hash(uint8_t *p, int i, enum reftable_hash id);
>
> -struct reftable_writer *t_reftable_strbuf_writer(struct reftable_buf *buf,
> +struct reftable_writer *cl_reftable_strbuf_writer(struct reftable_buf *buf,
> struct reftable_write_options *opts);
>
> -void t_reftable_write_to_buf(struct reftable_buf *buf,
> +void cl_reftable_write_to_buf(struct reftable_buf *buf,
> struct reftable_ref_record *refs,
> size_t nrecords,
> struct reftable_log_record *logs,
It is quite weird that we declare the replacement functions in
"unit-test.h" in the first commit only to remove them at a later point.
It would make way more sense if we introduced the functions in
"t/unit/lib-reftable.{c,h}" right from the start and then only remove
the unused functions in the last step.
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-02 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-29 17:52 [PATCH v2 00/10] t/unit-tests: convert unit-tests to use clar Seyi Kuforiji
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] t/unit-tests: implement reftable test helper functions in unit-test.{c,h} Seyi Kuforiji
2025-04-29 23:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable basics test to use clar test framework Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable block test to use clar Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-05 7:37 ` Seyi Chamber
2025-05-05 9:52 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-05 21:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-06 5:10 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable merged " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable pq " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable reader " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable readwrite " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable record " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-04-29 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable stack " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-05 9:11 ` Seyi Chamber
2025-05-05 9:52 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] t/unit-tests: adapt lib-reftable{c,h} helper functions to clar Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2025-05-05 7:27 ` Seyi Chamber
2025-05-05 9:52 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-26 9:04 ` Seyi Chamber
2025-05-26 12:56 ` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBSXJcT8REHWrsrx@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kuforiji98@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.