All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: Seyi Chamber <kuforiji98@gmail.com>,
	 git@vger.kernel.org, phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable block test to use clar
Date: Mon, 05 May 2025 14:14:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq7c2uoj40.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aBiKSeTLItw85A8z@pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Mon, 5 May 2025 11:52:09 +0200")

Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:

>     -M[<n>], --find-renames[=<n>]
>         Detect renames. If <n> is specified, it is a threshold on the similarity index (i.e. amount
>         of addition/deletions compared to the file’s size). For example, -M90% means Git should
>         consider a delete/add pair to be a rename if more than 90% of the file hasn’t changed.
>         Without a % sign, the number is to be read as a fraction, with a decimal point before it.
>         I.e., -M5 becomes 0.5, and is thus the same as -M50%. Similarly, -M05 is the same as -M5%.
>         To limit detection to exact renames, use -M100%. The default similarity index is 50%.
>
> What you probably wanted to say is `--find-renames=90%`, but without the
> percentage sign it is read as a fraction, where 1 means "exact copy" and
> 0 means "all different".

I am confused.  -M<number> without trailing %-sign is taken as
fraction against 1 followed by the same number of '0' has the
<number> has digits.  -M5 is 5 over 10, -M50 is 50 over 100.  -M90
is 90 over 100, so -M90 and -M90% should mean the same thing.

But you are right.  When you want to claim your pre- and post- image
files still correspond with each other in a meaningful way, even
after making extensive change, you would want to _lower_, not raise,
your similarity threshold.  If the default is -M50, then -M90 would
be a useful option to reject what Git (mistakenly) thinks are renames
and tell it to instead consider they are removals and creations.

THanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-05 21:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-29 17:52 [PATCH v2 00/10] t/unit-tests: convert unit-tests to use clar Seyi Kuforiji
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] t/unit-tests: implement reftable test helper functions in unit-test.{c,h} Seyi Kuforiji
2025-04-29 23:04   ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-02  9:57     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-02  9:57   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable basics test to use clar test framework Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02  9:57   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable block test to use clar Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02  9:57   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-05  7:37     ` Seyi Chamber
2025-05-05  9:52       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-05 21:14         ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-05-06  5:10           ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable merged " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02  9:57   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable pq " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable reader " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02  9:57   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable readwrite " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02  9:57   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable record " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-04-29 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable stack " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02  9:57   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-05  9:11     ` Seyi Chamber
2025-05-05  9:52       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] t/unit-tests: adapt lib-reftable{c,h} helper functions to clar Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02  9:57   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-05  7:27     ` Seyi Chamber
2025-05-05  9:52       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-26  9:04         ` Seyi Chamber
2025-05-26 12:56           ` Patrick Steinhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq7c2uoj40.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kuforiji98@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.