All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ci(win+Meson): build in Release mode
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 11:43:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBiIPe7EVTBxENUp@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5e2fdccc-2c52-805f-ff9c-b9e0e72614ac@gmx.de>

On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 09:27:10AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
> 
> On Mon, 5 May 2025, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, May 03, 2025 at 02:25:46PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:
> > > From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> > >     Changes since v1:
> > >     
> > >      * Rewrote the commit message to reflect that this patch is still
> > >        needed, even if the symptom that originally motivated the patch was
> > >        addressed in a different manner, because it was merely a symptom of
> > >        the underlying root cause that CI builds should not let Visual C
> > >        build Git in debug mode.
> > 
> > Ok, makes sense. I think we should ideally address this issue
> > strategically, e.g. by getting rid of asserts completely in our
> > codebase. But for now I agree that we should just build Git in release
> > mode on Windows.
> 
> I am afraid that getting rid of asserts in Git's codebase won't ever be
> able to address the challenge that Git -- despite much reluctance --
> relies on a couple of external dependencies that might at any point in
> time cause `assert()` to be called, e.g. due to unexpected changes in the
> CI runner images.

Good point indeed, I haven't considered this.

> In essence, we will need both: CI builds in release mode _and_ converting
> `assert()`s to `BUG()` calls (the latter, however, for different reasons
> than to proactively address CI hangs: Git can convey better information in
> `BUG()` calls than in `assert()` calls).
> 
> There are more reasons to use release mode builds in CI, too, but we
> already have a compelling reason to do so, therefore there is no need for
> me to spend more time assembling an exhaustive list.

Yup.

Patrick

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-05  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-25 15:05 [PATCH] ci(win+Meson): build in Release mode, avoiding t7001-mv hangs Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-04-25 15:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-28  7:47   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-28 17:01     ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-29 12:20       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 20:48         ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-30  8:58           ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-30 12:46             ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 20:57 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-05-03 14:25 ` [PATCH v2] ci(win+Meson): build in Release mode Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-05-05  6:06   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-05  7:27     ` Johannes Schindelin
2025-05-05  9:43       ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2025-05-05 15:54         ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-06  7:57           ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-06  8:32             ` Johannes Schindelin
2025-05-08 18:19               ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aBiIPe7EVTBxENUp@pks.im \
    --to=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=code@khaugsbakk.name \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.