* [PATCH] perf top: populate PMU capabilities data in perf_env
@ 2025-05-01 18:41 Thomas Falcon
2025-05-01 20:00 ` Ian Rogers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Falcon @ 2025-05-01 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
Namhyung Kim, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa,
Ian Rogers, Adrian Hunter, Kan Liang
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, Thomas Falcon
Calling perf top with brach filters enabled on Intel hybrid CPU's
with branch counter event logging support results in a segfault.
$ ./perf top -e '{cpu_core/cpu-cycles/,cpu_core/event=0xc6,umask=0x3,\
frontend=0x11,name=frontend_retired_dsb_miss/}' -j any,counter
perf: Segmentation fault
-------- backtrace --------
./perf() [0x55f460]
/lib64/libc.so.6(+0x1a050) [0x7fd8be227050]
./perf() [0x57b4a7]
./perf() [0x561e5a]
./perf() [0x604a81]
./perf() [0x4395b5]
./perf() [0x601732]
./perf() [0x439bc1]
./perf() [0x5d35b3]
./perf() [0x43936c]
/lib64/libc.so.6(+0x70ba8) [0x7fd8be27dba8]
/lib64/libc.so.6(+0xf4b8c) [0x7fd8be301b8c]
The cause is that perf_env__find_br_cntr_info tries to access a
null pointer pmu_caps in the perf_env struct. Presumably this would
also be an issue when using the cpu_pmu_caps structure available for
homogeneous core CPU's.
Fix this by populating cpu_pmu_caps and pmu_caps structures with
values from sysfs when calling perf top with branch stack sampling
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@intel.com>
---
tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 8 +++
tools/perf/util/env.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tools/perf/util/env.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 123 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
index 1061f4eebc3f..c2688e4ef3c4 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
@@ -1729,6 +1729,14 @@ int cmd_top(int argc, const char **argv)
if (opts->branch_stack && callchain_param.enabled)
symbol_conf.show_branchflag_count = true;
+ if (opts->branch_stack) {
+ status = perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(&perf_env);
+ if (status) {
+ pr_err("PMU capability data is not available\n");
+ goto out_delete_evlist;
+ }
+ }
+
sort__mode = SORT_MODE__TOP;
/* display thread wants entries to be collapsed in a different tree */
perf_hpp_list.need_collapse = 1;
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/env.c b/tools/perf/util/env.c
index 36411749e007..37ed6dc52cf3 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/env.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/env.c
@@ -416,6 +416,120 @@ static int perf_env__read_nr_cpus_avail(struct perf_env *env)
return env->nr_cpus_avail ? 0 : -ENOENT;
}
+static int __perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(struct perf_pmu *pmu,
+ int *nr_caps, char ***caps,
+ unsigned int *max_branches,
+ unsigned int *br_cntr_nr,
+ unsigned int *br_cntr_width)
+{
+ struct perf_pmu_caps *pcaps = NULL;
+ char *ptr, **tmp;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ *nr_caps = 0;
+ *caps = NULL;
+
+ if (!pmu->nr_caps)
+ return 0;
+
+ *caps = zalloc(sizeof(char *) * pmu->nr_caps);
+ if (!*caps)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ tmp = *caps;
+ list_for_each_entry(pcaps, &pmu->caps, list) {
+
+ if (asprintf(&ptr, "%s=%s", pcaps->name, pcaps->value) < 0) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto error;
+ }
+
+ *tmp++ = ptr;
+
+ if (!strcmp(pcaps->name, "branches"))
+ *max_branches = atoi(pcaps->value);
+
+ if (!strcmp(pcaps->name, "branch_counter_nr"))
+ *br_cntr_nr = atoi(pcaps->value);
+
+ if (!strcmp(pcaps->name, "branch_counter_width"))
+ *br_cntr_width = atoi(pcaps->value);
+ }
+ *nr_caps = pmu->nr_caps;
+ return 0;
+error:
+ while (tmp-- != *caps)
+ free(*tmp);
+ free(*caps);
+ *caps = NULL;
+ *nr_caps = 0;
+ return ret;
+}
+
+int perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(struct perf_env *env)
+{
+ struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
+ struct pmu_caps *pmu_caps;
+ int nr_pmu = 0, i = 0, j;
+ int ret;
+
+ nr_pmu = perf_pmus__num_core_pmus();
+
+ if (!nr_pmu)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ if (nr_pmu == 1) {
+ pmu = perf_pmus__scan_core(NULL);
+ if (!pmu)
+ return -ENODEV;
+ ret = perf_pmu__caps_parse(pmu);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ return __perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(pmu, &env->nr_cpu_pmu_caps,
+ &env->cpu_pmu_caps,
+ &env->max_branches,
+ &env->br_cntr_nr,
+ &env->br_cntr_width);
+ }
+
+ pmu_caps = zalloc(sizeof(*pmu_caps) * nr_pmu);
+ if (!pmu_caps)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ while ((pmu = perf_pmus__scan_core(pmu)) != NULL) {
+ if (perf_pmu__caps_parse(pmu) <= 0)
+ continue;
+ ret = __perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(pmu, &pmu_caps[i].nr_caps,
+ &pmu_caps[i].caps,
+ &pmu_caps[i].max_branches,
+ &pmu_caps[i].br_cntr_nr,
+ &pmu_caps[i].br_cntr_width);
+ if (ret)
+ goto error;
+
+ pmu_caps[i].pmu_name = strdup(pmu->name);
+ if (!pmu_caps[i].pmu_name) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto error;
+ }
+ i++;
+ }
+
+ env->nr_pmus_with_caps = nr_pmu;
+ env->pmu_caps = pmu_caps;
+
+ return 0;
+error:
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_pmu; i++) {
+ for (j = 0; j < pmu_caps[i].nr_caps; j++)
+ free(pmu_caps[i].caps[j]);
+ free(pmu_caps[i].caps);
+ free(pmu_caps[i].pmu_name);
+ }
+ free(pmu_caps);
+ return ret;
+}
+
const char *perf_env__raw_arch(struct perf_env *env)
{
return env && !perf_env__read_arch(env) ? env->arch : "unknown";
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/env.h b/tools/perf/util/env.h
index d90e343cf1fa..135a1f714905 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/env.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/env.h
@@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ struct btf_node;
extern struct perf_env perf_env;
+int perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(struct perf_env *env);
void perf_env__exit(struct perf_env *env);
int perf_env__kernel_is_64_bit(struct perf_env *env);
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] perf top: populate PMU capabilities data in perf_env 2025-05-01 18:41 [PATCH] perf top: populate PMU capabilities data in perf_env Thomas Falcon @ 2025-05-01 20:00 ` Ian Rogers 2025-05-01 20:46 ` Falcon, Thomas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Ian Rogers @ 2025-05-01 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Falcon Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Namhyung Kim, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Adrian Hunter, Kan Liang, linux-kernel, linux-perf-users On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 11:42 AM Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@intel.com> wrote: > > Calling perf top with brach filters enabled on Intel hybrid CPU's > with branch counter event logging support results in a segfault. > > $ ./perf top -e '{cpu_core/cpu-cycles/,cpu_core/event=0xc6,umask=0x3,\ > frontend=0x11,name=frontend_retired_dsb_miss/}' -j any,counter > perf: Segmentation fault > -------- backtrace -------- > ./perf() [0x55f460] > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x1a050) [0x7fd8be227050] > ./perf() [0x57b4a7] > ./perf() [0x561e5a] > ./perf() [0x604a81] > ./perf() [0x4395b5] > ./perf() [0x601732] > ./perf() [0x439bc1] > ./perf() [0x5d35b3] > ./perf() [0x43936c] > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x70ba8) [0x7fd8be27dba8] > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0xf4b8c) [0x7fd8be301b8c] Thanks Thomas. Could you generate this backtrace in GDB? I did write a patch to symbolize backtraces like this: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250313052952.871958-2-irogers@google.com/ Sadly without any reviewed tags and unmerged - the code calls routines that malloc so it isn't strictly sound if say the backtrace was needed from a SEGV in the malloc implementation, it is nicely self-referencing the perf APIs, .. > The cause is that perf_env__find_br_cntr_info tries to access a > null pointer pmu_caps in the perf_env struct. Presumably this would > also be an issue when using the cpu_pmu_caps structure available for > homogeneous core CPU's. I'm a little confused in the top code, we have the global perf_env being used and one in the session: https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/tree/tools/perf/builtin-top.c?h=perf-tools-next#n649 ``` ret = evlist__tui_browse_hists(top->evlist, help, &hbt, top->min_percent, &top->session->header.env, !top->record_opts.overwrite); ``` and the global perf_env: https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/tree/tools/perf/builtin-top.c?h=perf-tools-next#n1641 ``` status = perf_env__read_cpuid(&perf_env); ``` I kind of wish we didn't have the global one as what's the deal with ownership with it. > Fix this by populating cpu_pmu_caps and pmu_caps structures with > values from sysfs when calling perf top with branch stack sampling > enabled. I wonder if we could encounter similar problems from say a perf script handling live data and so some kind of lazy initialization should be employed. It is hard to say without seeing the backtrace. Thanks, Ian > Signed-off-by: Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@intel.com> > --- > tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 8 +++ > tools/perf/util/env.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tools/perf/util/env.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 123 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c > index 1061f4eebc3f..c2688e4ef3c4 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c > @@ -1729,6 +1729,14 @@ int cmd_top(int argc, const char **argv) > if (opts->branch_stack && callchain_param.enabled) > symbol_conf.show_branchflag_count = true; > > + if (opts->branch_stack) { > + status = perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(&perf_env); > + if (status) { > + pr_err("PMU capability data is not available\n"); > + goto out_delete_evlist; > + } > + } > + > sort__mode = SORT_MODE__TOP; > /* display thread wants entries to be collapsed in a different tree */ > perf_hpp_list.need_collapse = 1; > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/env.c b/tools/perf/util/env.c > index 36411749e007..37ed6dc52cf3 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/env.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/env.c > @@ -416,6 +416,120 @@ static int perf_env__read_nr_cpus_avail(struct perf_env *env) > return env->nr_cpus_avail ? 0 : -ENOENT; > } > > +static int __perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(struct perf_pmu *pmu, > + int *nr_caps, char ***caps, > + unsigned int *max_branches, > + unsigned int *br_cntr_nr, > + unsigned int *br_cntr_width) > +{ > + struct perf_pmu_caps *pcaps = NULL; > + char *ptr, **tmp; > + int ret = 0; > + > + *nr_caps = 0; > + *caps = NULL; > + > + if (!pmu->nr_caps) > + return 0; > + > + *caps = zalloc(sizeof(char *) * pmu->nr_caps); > + if (!*caps) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + tmp = *caps; > + list_for_each_entry(pcaps, &pmu->caps, list) { > + > + if (asprintf(&ptr, "%s=%s", pcaps->name, pcaps->value) < 0) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto error; > + } > + > + *tmp++ = ptr; > + > + if (!strcmp(pcaps->name, "branches")) > + *max_branches = atoi(pcaps->value); > + > + if (!strcmp(pcaps->name, "branch_counter_nr")) > + *br_cntr_nr = atoi(pcaps->value); > + > + if (!strcmp(pcaps->name, "branch_counter_width")) > + *br_cntr_width = atoi(pcaps->value); > + } > + *nr_caps = pmu->nr_caps; > + return 0; > +error: > + while (tmp-- != *caps) > + free(*tmp); > + free(*caps); > + *caps = NULL; > + *nr_caps = 0; > + return ret; > +} > + > +int perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(struct perf_env *env) > +{ > + struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL; > + struct pmu_caps *pmu_caps; > + int nr_pmu = 0, i = 0, j; > + int ret; > + > + nr_pmu = perf_pmus__num_core_pmus(); > + > + if (!nr_pmu) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + if (nr_pmu == 1) { > + pmu = perf_pmus__scan_core(NULL); > + if (!pmu) > + return -ENODEV; > + ret = perf_pmu__caps_parse(pmu); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + return __perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(pmu, &env->nr_cpu_pmu_caps, > + &env->cpu_pmu_caps, > + &env->max_branches, > + &env->br_cntr_nr, > + &env->br_cntr_width); > + } > + > + pmu_caps = zalloc(sizeof(*pmu_caps) * nr_pmu); > + if (!pmu_caps) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + while ((pmu = perf_pmus__scan_core(pmu)) != NULL) { > + if (perf_pmu__caps_parse(pmu) <= 0) > + continue; > + ret = __perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(pmu, &pmu_caps[i].nr_caps, > + &pmu_caps[i].caps, > + &pmu_caps[i].max_branches, > + &pmu_caps[i].br_cntr_nr, > + &pmu_caps[i].br_cntr_width); > + if (ret) > + goto error; > + > + pmu_caps[i].pmu_name = strdup(pmu->name); > + if (!pmu_caps[i].pmu_name) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto error; > + } > + i++; > + } > + > + env->nr_pmus_with_caps = nr_pmu; > + env->pmu_caps = pmu_caps; > + > + return 0; > +error: > + for (i = 0; i < nr_pmu; i++) { > + for (j = 0; j < pmu_caps[i].nr_caps; j++) > + free(pmu_caps[i].caps[j]); > + free(pmu_caps[i].caps); > + free(pmu_caps[i].pmu_name); > + } > + free(pmu_caps); > + return ret; > +} > + > const char *perf_env__raw_arch(struct perf_env *env) > { > return env && !perf_env__read_arch(env) ? env->arch : "unknown"; > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/env.h b/tools/perf/util/env.h > index d90e343cf1fa..135a1f714905 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/env.h > +++ b/tools/perf/util/env.h > @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ struct btf_node; > > extern struct perf_env perf_env; > > +int perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(struct perf_env *env); > void perf_env__exit(struct perf_env *env); > > int perf_env__kernel_is_64_bit(struct perf_env *env); > -- > 2.49.0 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf top: populate PMU capabilities data in perf_env 2025-05-01 20:00 ` Ian Rogers @ 2025-05-01 20:46 ` Falcon, Thomas 2025-05-06 16:09 ` Falcon, Thomas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Falcon, Thomas @ 2025-05-01 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: irogers@google.com Cc: alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, acme@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, Hunter, Adrian, namhyung@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com On Thu, 2025-05-01 at 13:00 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 11:42 AM Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@intel.com> wrote: > > > > Calling perf top with brach filters enabled on Intel hybrid CPU's > > with branch counter event logging support results in a segfault. > > > > $ ./perf top -e '{cpu_core/cpu-cycles/,cpu_core/event=0xc6,umask=0x3,\ > > frontend=0x11,name=frontend_retired_dsb_miss/}' -j any,counter > > perf: Segmentation fault > > -------- backtrace -------- > > ./perf() [0x55f460] > > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x1a050) [0x7fd8be227050] > > ./perf() [0x57b4a7] > > ./perf() [0x561e5a] > > ./perf() [0x604a81] > > ./perf() [0x4395b5] > > ./perf() [0x601732] > > ./perf() [0x439bc1] > > ./perf() [0x5d35b3] > > ./perf() [0x43936c] > > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x70ba8) [0x7fd8be27dba8] > > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0xf4b8c) [0x7fd8be301b8c] > Hi Ian, thanks for reviewing. > Thanks Thomas. Could you generate this backtrace in GDB? I did write a > patch to symbolize backtraces like this: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250313052952.871958-2-irogers@google.com/ > Sadly without any reviewed tags and unmerged - the code calls routines > that malloc so it isn't strictly sound if say the backtrace was needed > from a SEGV in the malloc implementation, it is nicely > self-referencing the perf APIs, .. Sorry about that, here is the backtrace I'm seeing when running the perf top command in gdb: Thread 27 "perf" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7fffcb7fe6c0 (LWP 812169)] 0x000000000057b4a7 in perf_env.find_br_cntr_info () (gdb) backtrace #0 0x000000000057b4a7 in perf_env.find_br_cntr_info () #1 0x0000000000561e5a in addr_map_symbol.account_cycles () #2 0x0000000000604a81 in hist.account_cycles () #3 0x00000000004395b5 in hist_iter.top_callback () #4 0x0000000000601732 in hist_entry_iter.add () #5 0x0000000000439bc1 in deliver_event () #6 0x00000000005d35b3 in __ordered_events__flush () #7 0x000000000043936c in process_thread () #8 0x00007ffff6e7dba8 in start_thread (arg=<optimized out>) at pthread_create.c:448 #9 0x00007ffff6f01b8c in __GI___clone3 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:78 Thanks, Tom > ``` > status = perf_env__read_cpuid(&perf_env); > ``` > > I kind of wish we didn't have the global one as what's the deal with > ownership with it. > > > Fix this by populating cpu_pmu_caps and pmu_caps structures with > > values from sysfs when calling perf top with branch stack sampling > > enabled. > > I wonder if we could encounter similar problems from say a perf script > handling live data and so some kind of lazy initialization should be > employed. It is hard to say without seeing the backtrace. > > Thanks, > Ian > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@intel.com> > > --- > > tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 8 +++ > > tools/perf/util/env.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > tools/perf/util/env.h | 1 + > > 3 files changed, 123 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c > > index 1061f4eebc3f..c2688e4ef3c4 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c > > @@ -1729,6 +1729,14 @@ int cmd_top(int argc, const char **argv) > > if (opts->branch_stack && callchain_param.enabled) > > symbol_conf.show_branchflag_count = true; > > > > + if (opts->branch_stack) { > > + status = perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(&perf_env); > > + if (status) { > > + pr_err("PMU capability data is not available\n"); > > + goto out_delete_evlist; > > + } > > + } > > + > > sort__mode = SORT_MODE__TOP; > > /* display thread wants entries to be collapsed in a different tree */ > > perf_hpp_list.need_collapse = 1; > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/env.c b/tools/perf/util/env.c > > index 36411749e007..37ed6dc52cf3 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/env.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/env.c > > @@ -416,6 +416,120 @@ static int perf_env__read_nr_cpus_avail(struct perf_env *env) > > return env->nr_cpus_avail ? 0 : -ENOENT; > > } > > > > +static int __perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(struct perf_pmu *pmu, > > + int *nr_caps, char ***caps, > > + unsigned int *max_branches, > > + unsigned int *br_cntr_nr, > > + unsigned int *br_cntr_width) > > +{ > > + struct perf_pmu_caps *pcaps = NULL; > > + char *ptr, **tmp; > > + int ret = 0; > > + > > + *nr_caps = 0; > > + *caps = NULL; > > + > > + if (!pmu->nr_caps) > > + return 0; > > + > > + *caps = zalloc(sizeof(char *) * pmu->nr_caps); > > + if (!*caps) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + tmp = *caps; > > + list_for_each_entry(pcaps, &pmu->caps, list) { > > + > > + if (asprintf(&ptr, "%s=%s", pcaps->name, pcaps->value) < 0) { > > + ret = -ENOMEM; > > + goto error; > > + } > > + > > + *tmp++ = ptr; > > + > > + if (!strcmp(pcaps->name, "branches")) > > + *max_branches = atoi(pcaps->value); > > + > > + if (!strcmp(pcaps->name, "branch_counter_nr")) > > + *br_cntr_nr = atoi(pcaps->value); > > + > > + if (!strcmp(pcaps->name, "branch_counter_width")) > > + *br_cntr_width = atoi(pcaps->value); > > + } > > + *nr_caps = pmu->nr_caps; > > + return 0; > > +error: > > + while (tmp-- != *caps) > > + free(*tmp); > > + free(*caps); > > + *caps = NULL; > > + *nr_caps = 0; > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > +int perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(struct perf_env *env) > > +{ > > + struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL; > > + struct pmu_caps *pmu_caps; > > + int nr_pmu = 0, i = 0, j; > > + int ret; > > + > > + nr_pmu = perf_pmus__num_core_pmus(); > > + > > + if (!nr_pmu) > > + return -ENODEV; > > + > > + if (nr_pmu == 1) { > > + pmu = perf_pmus__scan_core(NULL); > > + if (!pmu) > > + return -ENODEV; > > + ret = perf_pmu__caps_parse(pmu); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + return __perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(pmu, &env->nr_cpu_pmu_caps, > > + &env->cpu_pmu_caps, > > + &env->max_branches, > > + &env->br_cntr_nr, > > + &env->br_cntr_width); > > + } > > + > > + pmu_caps = zalloc(sizeof(*pmu_caps) * nr_pmu); > > + if (!pmu_caps) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + while ((pmu = perf_pmus__scan_core(pmu)) != NULL) { > > + if (perf_pmu__caps_parse(pmu) <= 0) > > + continue; > > + ret = __perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(pmu, &pmu_caps[i].nr_caps, > > + &pmu_caps[i].caps, > > + &pmu_caps[i].max_branches, > > + &pmu_caps[i].br_cntr_nr, > > + &pmu_caps[i].br_cntr_width); > > + if (ret) > > + goto error; > > + > > + pmu_caps[i].pmu_name = strdup(pmu->name); > > + if (!pmu_caps[i].pmu_name) { > > + ret = -ENOMEM; > > + goto error; > > + } > > + i++; > > + } > > + > > + env->nr_pmus_with_caps = nr_pmu; > > + env->pmu_caps = pmu_caps; > > + > > + return 0; > > +error: > > + for (i = 0; i < nr_pmu; i++) { > > + for (j = 0; j < pmu_caps[i].nr_caps; j++) > > + free(pmu_caps[i].caps[j]); > > + free(pmu_caps[i].caps); > > + free(pmu_caps[i].pmu_name); > > + } > > + free(pmu_caps); > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > const char *perf_env__raw_arch(struct perf_env *env) > > { > > return env && !perf_env__read_arch(env) ? env->arch : "unknown"; > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/env.h b/tools/perf/util/env.h > > index d90e343cf1fa..135a1f714905 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/env.h > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/env.h > > @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ struct btf_node; > > > > extern struct perf_env perf_env; > > > > +int perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(struct perf_env *env); > > void perf_env__exit(struct perf_env *env); > > > > int perf_env__kernel_is_64_bit(struct perf_env *env); > > -- > > 2.49.0 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf top: populate PMU capabilities data in perf_env 2025-05-01 20:46 ` Falcon, Thomas @ 2025-05-06 16:09 ` Falcon, Thomas 2025-05-06 16:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Falcon, Thomas @ 2025-05-06 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: irogers@google.com Cc: alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, acme@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Hunter, Adrian, namhyung@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com On Thu, 2025-05-01 at 20:46 +0000, Falcon, Thomas wrote: > On Thu, 2025-05-01 at 13:00 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > > On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 11:42 AM Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > Calling perf top with brach filters enabled on Intel hybrid CPU's > > > with branch counter event logging support results in a segfault. > > > > > > $ ./perf top -e '{cpu_core/cpu-cycles/,cpu_core/event=0xc6,umask=0x3,\ > > > frontend=0x11,name=frontend_retired_dsb_miss/}' -j any,counter > > > perf: Segmentation fault > > > -------- backtrace -------- > > > ./perf() [0x55f460] > > > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x1a050) [0x7fd8be227050] > > > ./perf() [0x57b4a7] > > > ./perf() [0x561e5a] > > > ./perf() [0x604a81] > > > ./perf() [0x4395b5] > > > ./perf() [0x601732] > > > ./perf() [0x439bc1] > > > ./perf() [0x5d35b3] > > > ./perf() [0x43936c] > > > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x70ba8) [0x7fd8be27dba8] > > > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0xf4b8c) [0x7fd8be301b8c] > > > > Hi Ian, thanks for reviewing. > > > Thanks Thomas. Could you generate this backtrace in GDB? I did write a > > patch to symbolize backtraces like this: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250313052952.871958-2-irogers@google.com/ > > Sadly without any reviewed tags and unmerged - the code calls routines > > that malloc so it isn't strictly sound if say the backtrace was needed > > from a SEGV in the malloc implementation, it is nicely > > self-referencing the perf APIs, .. > > Sorry about that, here is the backtrace I'm seeing when running the perf top command in gdb: > > Thread 27 "perf" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > [Switching to Thread 0x7fffcb7fe6c0 (LWP 812169)] > 0x000000000057b4a7 in perf_env.find_br_cntr_info () > (gdb) backtrace > #0 0x000000000057b4a7 in perf_env.find_br_cntr_info () > #1 0x0000000000561e5a in addr_map_symbol.account_cycles () > #2 0x0000000000604a81 in hist.account_cycles () > #3 0x00000000004395b5 in hist_iter.top_callback () > #4 0x0000000000601732 in hist_entry_iter.add () > #5 0x0000000000439bc1 in deliver_event () > #6 0x00000000005d35b3 in __ordered_events__flush () > #7 0x000000000043936c in process_thread () > #8 0x00007ffff6e7dba8 in start_thread (arg=<optimized out>) at pthread_create.c:448 > #9 0x00007ffff6f01b8c in __GI___clone3 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:78 > > Thanks, > Tom > Sorry, let me try this again... Thread 27 "perf" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7fffcf7fe6c0 (LWP 940046)] perf_env__find_br_cntr_info (env=0xf328c0 <perf_env>, nr=0x0, width=0x7fffcf7fd2c0) at util/env.c:653 653 *width = env->cpu_pmu_caps ? env->br_cntr_width : (gdb) bt #0 perf_env__find_br_cntr_info (env=0xf328c0 <perf_env>, nr=0x0, width=0x7fffcf7fd2c0) at util/env.c:653 #1 0x00000000005ad829 in symbol__account_br_cntr (branch=0x7fffd11f9c00, evsel=0xfae480, offset=20, br_cntr=4) at util/annotate.c:345 #2 0x00000000005ada8b in symbol__account_cycles (addr=5580436, start=5580433, sym=0x7fffd00d3010, cycles=1, evsel=0xfae480, br_cntr=4) at util/annotate.c:389 #3 0x00000000005adc06 in addr_map_symbol__account_cycles (ams=0x7fffd17b1e20, start=0x7fffd17b1f00, cycles=1, evsel=0xfae480, br_cntr=4) at util/annotate.c:422 #4 0x0000000000688ab4 in hist__account_cycles (bs=0x10cbaa8, al=0x7fffcf7fd540, sample=0x7fffcf7fd760, nonany_branch_mode=false, total_cycles=0x0, evsel=0xfae480) at util/hist.c:2774 #5 0x0000000000446004 in hist_iter__top_callback (iter=0x7fffcf7fd590, al=0x7fffcf7fd540, single=true, arg=0x7fffffff9de0) at builtin-top.c:737 #6 0x0000000000684d2a in hist_entry_iter__add (iter=0x7fffcf7fd590, al=0x7fffcf7fd540, max_stack_depth=127, arg=0x7fffffff9de0) at util/hist.c:1291 #7 0x00000000004464fe in perf_event__process_sample (tool=0x7fffffff9de0, event=0x10cba70, evsel=0xfae480, sample=0x7fffcf7fd760, machine=0x105ec68) at builtin-top.c:845 #8 0x0000000000447523 in deliver_event (qe=0x7fffffffa0f8, qevent=0x10cdd60) at builtin-top.c:1211 #9 0x0000000000648aff in do_flush (oe=0x7fffffffa0f8, show_progress=false) at util/ordered-events.c:245 #10 0x0000000000648e56 in __ordered_events__flush (oe=0x7fffffffa0f8, how=OE_FLUSH__TOP, timestamp=0) at util/ordered-events.c:324 #11 0x0000000000648f40 in ordered_events__flush (oe=0x7fffffffa0f8, how=OE_FLUSH__TOP) at util/ordered-events.c:342 #12 0x0000000000447097 in process_thread (arg=0x7fffffff9de0) at builtin-top.c:1120 #13 0x00007ffff6e7dba8 in start_thread (arg=<optimized out>) at pthread_create.c:448 #14 0x00007ffff6f01b8c in __GI___clone3 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:78 > > ``` > > status = perf_env__read_cpuid(&perf_env); > > ``` > > > > I kind of wish we didn't have the global one as what's the deal with > > ownership with it. > > > > > Fix this by populating cpu_pmu_caps and pmu_caps structures with > > > values from sysfs when calling perf top with branch stack sampling > > > enabled. > > > > I wonder if we could encounter similar problems from say a perf script > > handling live data and so some kind of lazy initialization should be > > employed. It is hard to say without seeing the backtrace. > > > > Thanks, > > Ian > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@intel.com> > > > --- > > > tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 8 +++ > > > tools/perf/util/env.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > tools/perf/util/env.h | 1 + > > > 3 files changed, 123 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c > > > index 1061f4eebc3f..c2688e4ef3c4 100644 > > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c > > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c > > > @@ -1729,6 +1729,14 @@ int cmd_top(int argc, const char **argv) > > > if (opts->branch_stack && callchain_param.enabled) > > > symbol_conf.show_branchflag_count = true; > > > > > > + if (opts->branch_stack) { > > > + status = perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(&perf_env); > > > + if (status) { > > > + pr_err("PMU capability data is not available\n"); > > > + goto out_delete_evlist; > > > + } > > > + } > > > + > > > sort__mode = SORT_MODE__TOP; > > > /* display thread wants entries to be collapsed in a different tree */ > > > perf_hpp_list.need_collapse = 1; > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/env.c b/tools/perf/util/env.c > > > index 36411749e007..37ed6dc52cf3 100644 > > > --- a/tools/perf/util/env.c > > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/env.c > > > @@ -416,6 +416,120 @@ static int perf_env__read_nr_cpus_avail(struct perf_env *env) > > > return env->nr_cpus_avail ? 0 : -ENOENT; > > > } > > > > > > +static int __perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(struct perf_pmu *pmu, > > > + int *nr_caps, char ***caps, > > > + unsigned int *max_branches, > > > + unsigned int *br_cntr_nr, > > > + unsigned int *br_cntr_width) > > > +{ > > > + struct perf_pmu_caps *pcaps = NULL; > > > + char *ptr, **tmp; > > > + int ret = 0; > > > + > > > + *nr_caps = 0; > > > + *caps = NULL; > > > + > > > + if (!pmu->nr_caps) > > > + return 0; > > > + > > > + *caps = zalloc(sizeof(char *) * pmu->nr_caps); > > > + if (!*caps) > > > + return -ENOMEM; > > > + > > > + tmp = *caps; > > > + list_for_each_entry(pcaps, &pmu->caps, list) { > > > + > > > + if (asprintf(&ptr, "%s=%s", pcaps->name, pcaps->value) < 0) { > > > + ret = -ENOMEM; > > > + goto error; > > > + } > > > + > > > + *tmp++ = ptr; > > > + > > > + if (!strcmp(pcaps->name, "branches")) > > > + *max_branches = atoi(pcaps->value); > > > + > > > + if (!strcmp(pcaps->name, "branch_counter_nr")) > > > + *br_cntr_nr = atoi(pcaps->value); > > > + > > > + if (!strcmp(pcaps->name, "branch_counter_width")) > > > + *br_cntr_width = atoi(pcaps->value); > > > + } > > > + *nr_caps = pmu->nr_caps; > > > + return 0; > > > +error: > > > + while (tmp-- != *caps) > > > + free(*tmp); > > > + free(*caps); > > > + *caps = NULL; > > > + *nr_caps = 0; > > > + return ret; > > > +} > > > + > > > +int perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(struct perf_env *env) > > > +{ > > > + struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL; > > > + struct pmu_caps *pmu_caps; > > > + int nr_pmu = 0, i = 0, j; > > > + int ret; > > > + > > > + nr_pmu = perf_pmus__num_core_pmus(); > > > + > > > + if (!nr_pmu) > > > + return -ENODEV; > > > + > > > + if (nr_pmu == 1) { > > > + pmu = perf_pmus__scan_core(NULL); > > > + if (!pmu) > > > + return -ENODEV; > > > + ret = perf_pmu__caps_parse(pmu); > > > + if (ret < 0) > > > + return ret; > > > + return __perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(pmu, &env->nr_cpu_pmu_caps, > > > + &env->cpu_pmu_caps, > > > + &env->max_branches, > > > + &env->br_cntr_nr, > > > + &env->br_cntr_width); > > > + } > > > + > > > + pmu_caps = zalloc(sizeof(*pmu_caps) * nr_pmu); > > > + if (!pmu_caps) > > > + return -ENOMEM; > > > + > > > + while ((pmu = perf_pmus__scan_core(pmu)) != NULL) { > > > + if (perf_pmu__caps_parse(pmu) <= 0) > > > + continue; > > > + ret = __perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(pmu, &pmu_caps[i].nr_caps, > > > + &pmu_caps[i].caps, > > > + &pmu_caps[i].max_branches, > > > + &pmu_caps[i].br_cntr_nr, > > > + &pmu_caps[i].br_cntr_width); > > > + if (ret) > > > + goto error; > > > + > > > + pmu_caps[i].pmu_name = strdup(pmu->name); > > > + if (!pmu_caps[i].pmu_name) { > > > + ret = -ENOMEM; > > > + goto error; > > > + } > > > + i++; > > > + } > > > + > > > + env->nr_pmus_with_caps = nr_pmu; > > > + env->pmu_caps = pmu_caps; > > > + > > > + return 0; > > > +error: > > > + for (i = 0; i < nr_pmu; i++) { > > > + for (j = 0; j < pmu_caps[i].nr_caps; j++) > > > + free(pmu_caps[i].caps[j]); > > > + free(pmu_caps[i].caps); > > > + free(pmu_caps[i].pmu_name); > > > + } > > > + free(pmu_caps); > > > + return ret; > > > +} > > > + > > > const char *perf_env__raw_arch(struct perf_env *env) > > > { > > > return env && !perf_env__read_arch(env) ? env->arch : "unknown"; > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/env.h b/tools/perf/util/env.h > > > index d90e343cf1fa..135a1f714905 100644 > > > --- a/tools/perf/util/env.h > > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/env.h > > > @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ struct btf_node; > > > > > > extern struct perf_env perf_env; > > > > > > +int perf_env__read_core_pmu_caps(struct perf_env *env); > > > void perf_env__exit(struct perf_env *env); > > > > > > int perf_env__kernel_is_64_bit(struct perf_env *env); > > > -- > > > 2.49.0 > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf top: populate PMU capabilities data in perf_env 2025-05-06 16:09 ` Falcon, Thomas @ 2025-05-06 16:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2025-05-06 18:52 ` Falcon, Thomas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2025-05-06 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Falcon, Thomas Cc: irogers@google.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Hunter, Adrian, namhyung@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 04:09:37PM +0000, Falcon, Thomas wrote: > On Thu, 2025-05-01 at 20:46 +0000, Falcon, Thomas wrote: > > On Thu, 2025-05-01 at 13:00 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > > > On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 11:42 AM Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@intel.com> wrote: > > > > Calling perf top with brach filters enabled on Intel hybrid CPU's > > > > with branch counter event logging support results in a segfault. > > > > $ ./perf top -e '{cpu_core/cpu-cycles/,cpu_core/event=0xc6,umask=0x3,\ > > > > frontend=0x11,name=frontend_retired_dsb_miss/}' -j any,counter > > > > perf: Segmentation fault > > > > -------- backtrace -------- > > > > ./perf() [0x55f460] > > > > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x1a050) [0x7fd8be227050] > > > > ./perf() [0x57b4a7] > > > > ./perf() [0x561e5a] > > > > ./perf() [0x604a81] > > > > ./perf() [0x4395b5] > > > > ./perf() [0x601732] > > > > ./perf() [0x439bc1] > > > > ./perf() [0x5d35b3] > > > > ./perf() [0x43936c] > > > > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x70ba8) [0x7fd8be27dba8] > > > > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0xf4b8c) [0x7fd8be301b8c] > > Hi Ian, thanks for reviewing. > > > Thanks Thomas. Could you generate this backtrace in GDB? I did write a > > > patch to symbolize backtraces like this: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250313052952.871958-2-irogers@google.com/ > > > Sadly without any reviewed tags and unmerged - the code calls routines > > > that malloc so it isn't strictly sound if say the backtrace was needed > > > from a SEGV in the malloc implementation, it is nicely > > > self-referencing the perf APIs, .. > > Sorry about that, here is the backtrace I'm seeing when running the perf top command in gdb: > > Thread 27 "perf" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > [Switching to Thread 0x7fffcb7fe6c0 (LWP 812169)] > > 0x000000000057b4a7 in perf_env.find_br_cntr_info () > > (gdb) backtrace > > #0 0x000000000057b4a7 in perf_env.find_br_cntr_info () > > #1 0x0000000000561e5a in addr_map_symbol.account_cycles () > > #2 0x0000000000604a81 in hist.account_cycles () > > #3 0x00000000004395b5 in hist_iter.top_callback () > > #4 0x0000000000601732 in hist_entry_iter.add () > > #5 0x0000000000439bc1 in deliver_event () > > #6 0x00000000005d35b3 in __ordered_events__flush () > > #7 0x000000000043936c in process_thread () > > #8 0x00007ffff6e7dba8 in start_thread (arg=<optimized out>) at pthread_create.c:448 > > #9 0x00007ffff6f01b8c in __GI___clone3 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:78 > Sorry, let me try this again... > Thread 27 "perf" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > [Switching to Thread 0x7fffcf7fe6c0 (LWP 940046)] > perf_env__find_br_cntr_info (env=0xf328c0 <perf_env>, nr=0x0, width=0x7fffcf7fd2c0) at util/env.c:653 > 653 *width = env->cpu_pmu_caps ? env->br_cntr_width : > (gdb) bt > #0 perf_env__find_br_cntr_info (env=0xf328c0 <perf_env>, nr=0x0, width=0x7fffcf7fd2c0) at util/env.c:653 > #1 0x00000000005ad829 in symbol__account_br_cntr (branch=0x7fffd11f9c00, evsel=0xfae480, offset=20, br_cntr=4) at util/annotate.c:345 > #2 0x00000000005ada8b in symbol__account_cycles (addr=5580436, start=5580433, sym=0x7fffd00d3010, cycles=1, evsel=0xfae480, br_cntr=4) at util/annotate.c:389 > #3 0x00000000005adc06 in addr_map_symbol__account_cycles (ams=0x7fffd17b1e20, start=0x7fffd17b1f00, cycles=1, evsel=0xfae480, br_cntr=4) at util/annotate.c:422 > #4 0x0000000000688ab4 in hist__account_cycles (bs=0x10cbaa8, al=0x7fffcf7fd540, sample=0x7fffcf7fd760, nonany_branch_mode=false, total_cycles=0x0, evsel=0xfae480) at util/hist.c:2774 > #5 0x0000000000446004 in hist_iter__top_callback (iter=0x7fffcf7fd590, al=0x7fffcf7fd540, single=true, arg=0x7fffffff9de0) at builtin-top.c:737 > #6 0x0000000000684d2a in hist_entry_iter__add (iter=0x7fffcf7fd590, al=0x7fffcf7fd540, max_stack_depth=127, arg=0x7fffffff9de0) at util/hist.c:1291 > #7 0x00000000004464fe in perf_event__process_sample (tool=0x7fffffff9de0, event=0x10cba70, evsel=0xfae480, sample=0x7fffcf7fd760, machine=0x105ec68) at builtin-top.c:845 > #8 0x0000000000447523 in deliver_event (qe=0x7fffffffa0f8, qevent=0x10cdd60) at builtin-top.c:1211 > #9 0x0000000000648aff in do_flush (oe=0x7fffffffa0f8, show_progress=false) at util/ordered-events.c:245 > #10 0x0000000000648e56 in __ordered_events__flush (oe=0x7fffffffa0f8, how=OE_FLUSH__TOP, timestamp=0) at util/ordered-events.c:324 > #11 0x0000000000648f40 in ordered_events__flush (oe=0x7fffffffa0f8, how=OE_FLUSH__TOP) at util/ordered-events.c:342 > #12 0x0000000000447097 in process_thread (arg=0x7fffffff9de0) at builtin-top.c:1120 > #13 0x00007ffff6e7dba8 in start_thread (arg=<optimized out>) at pthread_create.c:448 > #14 0x00007ffff6f01b8c in __GI___clone3 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:78 I'll test on a 14700 later today, but on this one it is working: root@x1:~# grep -m1 "model name" /proc/cpuinfo model name : 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-1365U root@x1:~# perf -vv perf version 6.15.rc2.g8feafba59c51 aio: [ on ] # HAVE_AIO_SUPPORT bpf: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT bpf_skeletons: [ on ] # HAVE_BPF_SKEL debuginfod: [ on ] # HAVE_DEBUGINFOD_SUPPORT dwarf: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBDW_SUPPORT dwarf_getlocations: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBDW_SUPPORT dwarf-unwind: [ on ] # HAVE_DWARF_UNWIND_SUPPORT auxtrace: [ on ] # HAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT libbfd: [ OFF ] # HAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT ( tip: Deprecated, license incompatibility, use BUILD_NONDISTRO=1 and install binutils-dev[el] ) libcapstone: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBCAPSTONE_SUPPORT libcrypto: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBCRYPTO_SUPPORT libdw-dwarf-unwind: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBDW_SUPPORT libelf: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBELF_SUPPORT libnuma: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT libopencsd: [ on ] # HAVE_CSTRACE_SUPPORT libperl: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBPERL_SUPPORT libpfm4: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBPFM libpython: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBPYTHON_SUPPORT libslang: [ on ] # HAVE_SLANG_SUPPORT libtraceevent: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT libunwind: [ OFF ] # HAVE_LIBUNWIND_SUPPORT ( tip: Deprecated, use LIBUNWIND=1 and install libunwind-dev[el] to build with it ) lzma: [ on ] # HAVE_LZMA_SUPPORT numa_num_possible_cpus: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT zlib: [ on ] # HAVE_ZLIB_SUPPORT zstd: [ on ] # HAVE_ZSTD_SUPPORT root@x1:~# perf top -e '{cpu_core/cpu-cycles/,cpu_core/event=0xc6,umask=0x3,frontend=0x11,name=frontend_retired_dsb_miss/}' -j any,counte With what is in perf-tools-next/perf-tools-next: ⬢ [acme@toolbx perf-tools-next]$ git log --oneline -10 8feafba59c510be3 (HEAD -> perf-tools-next, x1/perf-tools-next, x1/HEAD) perf test: Add direct off-cpu tests 9557c000768741bb perf record --off-cpu: Add --off-cpu-thresh option 74069a01609ef0f4 perf record --off-cpu: Dump the remaining PERF_SAMPLE_ in sample_type from BPF's stack trace map 8ae7a5769b0a3ac2 perf script: Display off-cpu samples correctly 7de1a87f1ee75743 perf record --off-cpu: Disable perf_event's callchain collection 7f8f56475d585117 perf evsel: Assemble off-cpu samples d6948f2af24e04ea perf record --off-cpu: Dump off-cpu samples in BPF 282c195906c76ddf perf record --off-cpu: Preparation of off-cpu BPF program 0f72027bb9fb77a2 perf record --off-cpu: Parse off-cpu event 671e943452b18001 perf evsel: Expose evsel__is_offcpu_event() for future use ⬢ [acme@toolbx perf-tools-next]$ - Arnaldo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf top: populate PMU capabilities data in perf_env 2025-05-06 16:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2025-05-06 18:52 ` Falcon, Thomas 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Falcon, Thomas @ 2025-05-06 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: acme@kernel.org Cc: alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, Hunter, Adrian, namhyung@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, irogers@google.com, mark.rutland@arm.com On Tue, 2025-05-06 at 13:56 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 04:09:37PM +0000, Falcon, Thomas wrote: > > On Thu, 2025-05-01 at 20:46 +0000, Falcon, Thomas wrote: > > > On Thu, 2025-05-01 at 13:00 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 11:42 AM Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > Calling perf top with brach filters enabled on Intel hybrid CPU's > > > > > with branch counter event logging support results in a segfault. > > > > > > $ ./perf top -e '{cpu_core/cpu-cycles/,cpu_core/event=0xc6,umask=0x3,\ > > > > > frontend=0x11,name=frontend_retired_dsb_miss/}' -j any,counter > > > > > perf: Segmentation fault > > > > > -------- backtrace -------- > > > > > ./perf() [0x55f460] > > > > > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x1a050) [0x7fd8be227050] > > > > > ./perf() [0x57b4a7] > > > > > ./perf() [0x561e5a] > > > > > ./perf() [0x604a81] > > > > > ./perf() [0x4395b5] > > > > > ./perf() [0x601732] > > > > > ./perf() [0x439bc1] > > > > > ./perf() [0x5d35b3] > > > > > ./perf() [0x43936c] > > > > > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x70ba8) [0x7fd8be27dba8] > > > > > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0xf4b8c) [0x7fd8be301b8c] > > > > Hi Ian, thanks for reviewing. > > > > > Thanks Thomas. Could you generate this backtrace in GDB? I did write a > > > > patch to symbolize backtraces like this: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250313052952.871958-2-irogers@google.com/ > > > > Sadly without any reviewed tags and unmerged - the code calls routines > > > > that malloc so it isn't strictly sound if say the backtrace was needed > > > > from a SEGV in the malloc implementation, it is nicely > > > > self-referencing the perf APIs, .. > > > > Sorry about that, here is the backtrace I'm seeing when running the perf top command in gdb: > > > > Thread 27 "perf" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > > > [Switching to Thread 0x7fffcb7fe6c0 (LWP 812169)] > > > 0x000000000057b4a7 in perf_env.find_br_cntr_info () > > > (gdb) backtrace > > > #0 0x000000000057b4a7 in perf_env.find_br_cntr_info () > > > #1 0x0000000000561e5a in addr_map_symbol.account_cycles () > > > #2 0x0000000000604a81 in hist.account_cycles () > > > #3 0x00000000004395b5 in hist_iter.top_callback () > > > #4 0x0000000000601732 in hist_entry_iter.add () > > > #5 0x0000000000439bc1 in deliver_event () > > > #6 0x00000000005d35b3 in __ordered_events__flush () > > > #7 0x000000000043936c in process_thread () > > > #8 0x00007ffff6e7dba8 in start_thread (arg=<optimized out>) at pthread_create.c:448 > > > #9 0x00007ffff6f01b8c in __GI___clone3 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:78 > > > Sorry, let me try this again... > > > Thread 27 "perf" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > [Switching to Thread 0x7fffcf7fe6c0 (LWP 940046)] > > perf_env__find_br_cntr_info (env=0xf328c0 <perf_env>, nr=0x0, width=0x7fffcf7fd2c0) at util/env.c:653 > > 653 *width = env->cpu_pmu_caps ? env->br_cntr_width : > > (gdb) bt > > #0 perf_env__find_br_cntr_info (env=0xf328c0 <perf_env>, nr=0x0, width=0x7fffcf7fd2c0) at util/env.c:653 > > #1 0x00000000005ad829 in symbol__account_br_cntr (branch=0x7fffd11f9c00, evsel=0xfae480, offset=20, br_cntr=4) at util/annotate.c:345 > > #2 0x00000000005ada8b in symbol__account_cycles (addr=5580436, start=5580433, sym=0x7fffd00d3010, cycles=1, evsel=0xfae480, br_cntr=4) at util/annotate.c:389 > > #3 0x00000000005adc06 in addr_map_symbol__account_cycles (ams=0x7fffd17b1e20, start=0x7fffd17b1f00, cycles=1, evsel=0xfae480, br_cntr=4) at util/annotate.c:422 > > #4 0x0000000000688ab4 in hist__account_cycles (bs=0x10cbaa8, al=0x7fffcf7fd540, sample=0x7fffcf7fd760, nonany_branch_mode=false, total_cycles=0x0, evsel=0xfae480) at util/hist.c:2774 > > #5 0x0000000000446004 in hist_iter__top_callback (iter=0x7fffcf7fd590, al=0x7fffcf7fd540, single=true, arg=0x7fffffff9de0) at builtin-top.c:737 > > #6 0x0000000000684d2a in hist_entry_iter__add (iter=0x7fffcf7fd590, al=0x7fffcf7fd540, max_stack_depth=127, arg=0x7fffffff9de0) at util/hist.c:1291 > > #7 0x00000000004464fe in perf_event__process_sample (tool=0x7fffffff9de0, event=0x10cba70, evsel=0xfae480, sample=0x7fffcf7fd760, machine=0x105ec68) at builtin-top.c:845 > > #8 0x0000000000447523 in deliver_event (qe=0x7fffffffa0f8, qevent=0x10cdd60) at builtin-top.c:1211 > > #9 0x0000000000648aff in do_flush (oe=0x7fffffffa0f8, show_progress=false) at util/ordered-events.c:245 > > #10 0x0000000000648e56 in __ordered_events__flush (oe=0x7fffffffa0f8, how=OE_FLUSH__TOP, timestamp=0) at util/ordered-events.c:324 > > #11 0x0000000000648f40 in ordered_events__flush (oe=0x7fffffffa0f8, how=OE_FLUSH__TOP) at util/ordered-events.c:342 > > #12 0x0000000000447097 in process_thread (arg=0x7fffffff9de0) at builtin-top.c:1120 > > #13 0x00007ffff6e7dba8 in start_thread (arg=<optimized out>) at pthread_create.c:448 > > #14 0x00007ffff6f01b8c in __GI___clone3 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:78 > > I'll test on a 14700 later today, but on this one it is working: > > root@x1:~# grep -m1 "model name" /proc/cpuinfo > model name : 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-1365U > root@x1:~# perf -vv > perf version 6.15.rc2.g8feafba59c51 > aio: [ on ] # HAVE_AIO_SUPPORT > bpf: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT > bpf_skeletons: [ on ] # HAVE_BPF_SKEL > debuginfod: [ on ] # HAVE_DEBUGINFOD_SUPPORT > dwarf: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBDW_SUPPORT > dwarf_getlocations: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBDW_SUPPORT > dwarf-unwind: [ on ] # HAVE_DWARF_UNWIND_SUPPORT > auxtrace: [ on ] # HAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT > libbfd: [ OFF ] # HAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT ( tip: Deprecated, license incompatibility, use BUILD_NONDISTRO=1 and install binutils-dev[el] ) > libcapstone: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBCAPSTONE_SUPPORT > libcrypto: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBCRYPTO_SUPPORT > libdw-dwarf-unwind: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBDW_SUPPORT > libelf: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBELF_SUPPORT > libnuma: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT > libopencsd: [ on ] # HAVE_CSTRACE_SUPPORT > libperl: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBPERL_SUPPORT > libpfm4: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBPFM > libpython: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBPYTHON_SUPPORT > libslang: [ on ] # HAVE_SLANG_SUPPORT > libtraceevent: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT > libunwind: [ OFF ] # HAVE_LIBUNWIND_SUPPORT ( tip: Deprecated, use LIBUNWIND=1 and install libunwind-dev[el] to build with it ) > lzma: [ on ] # HAVE_LZMA_SUPPORT > numa_num_possible_cpus: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBNUMA_SUPPORT > zlib: [ on ] # HAVE_ZLIB_SUPPORT > zstd: [ on ] # HAVE_ZSTD_SUPPORT > root@x1:~# perf top -e '{cpu_core/cpu-cycles/,cpu_core/event=0xc6,umask=0x3,frontend=0x11,name=frontend_retired_dsb_miss/}' -j any,counte > I should have been clearer in my commit message but it requires PMU's with "branch_counter_nr" and "branch_counter_width" capabilities to recreate. $ ls /sys/devices/cpu_core/caps branch_counter_nr branch_counter_width branches max_precise pmu_name $ sudo perf top -e '{cpu_core/cpu- cycles/,cpu_core/event=0xc6,umask=0x3,frontend=0x11,name=frontend_retired_dsb_miss/}' -j any,counter perf: Segmentation fault -------- backtrace -------- perf(+0xfa734) [0x561b5b19f734] /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x1a050) [0x7faa77a27050] perf(perf_env__find_br_cntr_info+0x77) [0x561b5b1b8377] perf(addr_map_symbol__account_cycles+0x22e) [0x561b5b1a27de] perf(hist__account_cycles+0x241) [0x561b5b23dae1] perf(+0x2c459) [0x561b5b0d1459] perf(hist_entry_iter__add+0xe2) [0x561b5b239a32] perf(+0x2ca08) [0x561b5b0d1a08] perf(+0x168373) [0x561b5b20d373] perf(+0x2c214) [0x561b5b0d1214] /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x71168) [0x7faa77a7e168] /lib64/libc.so.6(+0xf514c) [0x7faa77b0214c] Thanks, Tom > Add --off-cpu-thresh option > 74069a01609ef0f4 perf record --off-cpu: Dump the remaining PERF_SAMPLE_ in sample_type from BPF's stack trace map > 8ae7a5769b0a3ac2 perf script: Display off-cpu samples correctly > 7de1a87f1ee75743 perf record --off-cpu: Disable perf_event's callchain collection > 7f8f56475d585117 perf evsel: Assemble off-cpu samples > d6948f2af24e04ea perf record --off-cpu: Dump off-cpu samples in BPF > 282c195906c76ddf perf record --off-cpu: Preparation of off-cpu BPF program > 0f72027bb9fb77a2 perf record --off-cpu: Parse off-cpu event > 671e943452b18001 perf evsel: Expose evsel__is_offcpu_event() for future use > ⬢ [acme@toolbx perf-tools-next]$ > > - Arnaldo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-05-06 18:52 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2025-05-01 18:41 [PATCH] perf top: populate PMU capabilities data in perf_env Thomas Falcon 2025-05-01 20:00 ` Ian Rogers 2025-05-01 20:46 ` Falcon, Thomas 2025-05-06 16:09 ` Falcon, Thomas 2025-05-06 16:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2025-05-06 18:52 ` Falcon, Thomas
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.