All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Krishna chaitanya chundru" <quic_krichai@quicinc.com>
Cc: "Wilfred Mallawa" <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>,
	"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	"Hans Zhang" <18255117159@163.com>,
	"Laszlo Fiat" <laszlo.fiat@proton.me>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] PCI: dwc: Link Up IRQ fixes
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 16:33:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBodwvmG6ENM7haH@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250506073934.433176-6-cassel@kernel.org>

On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 09:39:35AM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> Hello there,
> 
> Commit 8d3bf19f1b58 ("PCI: dwc: Don't wait for link up if driver can detect
> Link Up event") added support for DWC to not wait for link up before
> enumerating the bus. However, we cannot simply enumerate the bus after
> receiving a Link Up IRQ, we still need to wait PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS time
> to allow a device to become ready after deasserting PERST. To avoid
> bringing back an conditional delay during probe, perform the wait in the
> threaded IRQ handler instead.
> 
> Please review.
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> Niklas

Hello Laszlo,

Since you have a RK3588 based board, sending a Tested-by
tag on testing patches 1-2 makes sense.

However, patches 3-4 are for Qualcomm based boards.
I'm not sure if you also have a Qualcomm board at your disposal.

If you don't, Manivannan can probably drop your Tested-by tags
on patches 3-4, but it might be good to know until next time.

Thank you for testing!


Kind regards,
Niklas


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Krishna chaitanya chundru" <quic_krichai@quicinc.com>
Cc: "Wilfred Mallawa" <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>,
	"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	"Hans Zhang" <18255117159@163.com>,
	"Laszlo Fiat" <laszlo.fiat@proton.me>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] PCI: dwc: Link Up IRQ fixes
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 16:33:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBodwvmG6ENM7haH@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250506073934.433176-6-cassel@kernel.org>

On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 09:39:35AM +0200, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> Hello there,
> 
> Commit 8d3bf19f1b58 ("PCI: dwc: Don't wait for link up if driver can detect
> Link Up event") added support for DWC to not wait for link up before
> enumerating the bus. However, we cannot simply enumerate the bus after
> receiving a Link Up IRQ, we still need to wait PCIE_T_RRS_READY_MS time
> to allow a device to become ready after deasserting PERST. To avoid
> bringing back an conditional delay during probe, perform the wait in the
> threaded IRQ handler instead.
> 
> Please review.
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> Niklas

Hello Laszlo,

Since you have a RK3588 based board, sending a Tested-by
tag on testing patches 1-2 makes sense.

However, patches 3-4 are for Qualcomm based boards.
I'm not sure if you also have a Qualcomm board at your disposal.

If you don't, Manivannan can probably drop your Tested-by tags
on patches 3-4, but it might be good to know until next time.

Thank you for testing!


Kind regards,
Niklas

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-06 18:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-06  7:39 [PATCH v2 0/4] PCI: dwc: Link Up IRQ fixes Niklas Cassel
2025-05-06  7:39 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-06  7:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] PCI: dw-rockchip: Do not enumerate bus before endpoint devices are ready Niklas Cassel
2025-05-06  7:39   ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-06 11:32   ` Laszlo Fiat
2025-05-06 11:32     ` Laszlo Fiat
2025-05-06 22:23   ` Wilfred Mallawa
2025-05-06 22:23     ` Wilfred Mallawa
2025-05-28 22:42   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-05-28 22:42     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-05-30 13:57     ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-30 13:57       ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-30 15:21       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-05-30 15:21         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-05-30 15:59     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-30 15:59       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-30 17:19       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-05-30 17:19         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-05-30 17:24         ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-30 17:24           ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-30 19:43           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-05-30 19:43             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-05-31  6:47             ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-31  6:47               ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-03 14:08               ` Niklas Cassel
2025-06-03 14:08                 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-06-03 18:12                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-03 18:12                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-04 11:40                   ` Niklas Cassel
2025-06-04 11:40                     ` Niklas Cassel
2025-06-04 17:10                     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-04 17:10                       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-04 18:44                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-04 18:44                         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-05 12:28                         ` Niklas Cassel
2025-06-05 12:28                           ` Niklas Cassel
2025-06-05 13:22                           ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-05 13:22                             ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-06-05 19:27                           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-05 19:27                             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-05-06  7:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: qcom: " Niklas Cassel
2025-05-06 10:11   ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2025-05-06 11:29   ` Laszlo Fiat
2025-05-06 22:24   ` Wilfred Mallawa
2025-05-06  7:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] PCI: dw-rockchip: Replace PERST sleep time with proper macro Niklas Cassel
2025-05-06  7:39   ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-06  9:07   ` Hans Zhang
2025-05-06  9:07     ` Hans Zhang
2025-05-06 11:36   ` Laszlo Fiat
2025-05-06 11:36     ` Laszlo Fiat
2025-05-06 22:24   ` Wilfred Mallawa
2025-05-06 22:24     ` Wilfred Mallawa
2025-05-06  7:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] PCI: qcom: " Niklas Cassel
2025-05-06  9:07   ` Hans Zhang
2025-05-06 10:12   ` Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
2025-05-06 11:37   ` Laszlo Fiat
2025-05-06 22:25   ` Wilfred Mallawa
2025-05-06 14:33 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2025-05-06 14:33   ` [PATCH v2 0/4] PCI: dwc: Link Up IRQ fixes Niklas Cassel
2025-05-06 14:51   ` Laszlo Fiat
2025-05-06 14:51     ` Laszlo Fiat
2025-05-13 10:53 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-13 10:53   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-13 14:07   ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-13 14:07     ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-15 17:33     ` Laszlo Fiat
2025-05-15 17:33       ` Laszlo Fiat
2025-05-16 10:00       ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-16 10:00         ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-16 18:48         ` Laszlo Fiat
2025-05-16 18:48           ` Laszlo Fiat
2025-05-19  9:44           ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-19  9:44             ` Niklas Cassel
2025-05-19 12:10             ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-19 12:10               ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-19 12:37 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-19 12:37   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aBodwvmG6ENM7haH@ryzen \
    --to=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=18255117159@163.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=laszlo.fiat@proton.me \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=quic_krichai@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.