All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<seanjc@google.com>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: Deduplicate MSR interception enabling and disabling
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 10:20:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aE9/ayZNEXoA/ZEE@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0d1e9a86-41aa-46dd-812b-308db5861b16@linux.intel.com>

>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
>> @@ -388,21 +388,13 @@ void vmx_ept_load_pdptrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>  
>>  void vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, int type);
>>  void vmx_enable_intercept_for_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, int type);
>> +void vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, int type, bool enable);
>>  
>>  u64 vmx_get_l2_tsc_offset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>  u64 vmx_get_l2_tsc_multiplier(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>  
>>  gva_t vmx_get_untagged_addr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva, unsigned int flags);
>>  
>> -static inline void vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr,
>> -					     int type, bool value)
>> -{
>> -	if (value)
>> -		vmx_enable_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, msr, type);
>> -	else
>> -		vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, msr, type);
>> -}
>> -
>>  void vmx_update_cpu_dirty_logging(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>  
>>  /*
>
>The change looks good to me. 
>
>Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>

Thanks.

>
>Just curious, is there a preference on using these 3 interfaces? When
>should we use the disable/enable interfaces? When should be we use the set
>interface?  or no preference?

I think the set API is to reduce boilerplate code. So, use the set API when
you need to perform conditional logic, such as

	if (/*check guest/host caps*/)
		//disable intercept
	else
		//enable intercept

otherwise, use the disable/enable APIs.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-16  2:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-12  8:19 [PATCH 0/2] More cleanups to MSR interception code Chao Gao
2025-06-12  8:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: Deduplicate MSR interception enabling and disabling Chao Gao
2025-06-12 11:25   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-06-12 12:04     ` Chao Gao
2025-06-13  1:37   ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-16  2:20     ` Chao Gao [this message]
2025-06-24 22:44       ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-24 22:47   ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-25 10:57     ` Chao Gao
2025-06-12  8:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: SVM: Simplify MSR interception logic for IA32_XSS MSR Chao Gao
2025-06-13  1:39   ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-06-24 22:48   ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-25  7:20   ` Binbin Wu
2025-06-25 22:25 ` [PATCH 0/2] More cleanups to MSR interception code Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aE9/ayZNEXoA/ZEE@intel.com \
    --to=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.