From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] selftests: net: add netpoll basic functionality test
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 02:16:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFkbXFvOKeMALwBg@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250621065121.78701641@kernel.org>
On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 06:51:21AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 01:39:43 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> > > FWIW you can steal bpftrace integration from this series:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250421222827.283737-22-kuba@kernel.org/
> >
> > Yes, that would be great. I think we can iterate until we hit the poll
> > path, otherwise we skip the test at timeout. Something as:
> >
> > while (true):
> > send msg
> > if netpoll_poll_dev() was invoked:
> > ksft_exit
> >
> > if timeout:
> > raise KsftSkipEx
> >
> > As soon as your code lands, I will adapt the test to do so. Meanwhile,
> > I will send the v1 for the netpoll, and later we can iterate.
> >
> > Thanks for working on this bfptrace helper. This will be useful on other
> > usecases as well.
>
> Right, you're the second person I pointed that patch out to. Would be
> great if someone could steal that patch and make it a part of their
> series so that it gets merged
I can do that. I was expecting your patches to be landed, and then
I would reuse it. I was not expecting to ship it as part of my patchset.
So, the selftest for netpoll is already in the mailing list[1], so, we
have two options, now:
1) Steal your patch and make [1] depend on it.
2) Merge the selftest [1] and, then, steal your patch by adding the
bpftrace support in it.
What is your recommendation?
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250620-netpoll_test-v1-1-5068832f72fc@debian.org/ [1]
Thanks,
--breno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-23 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-12 16:49 [PATCH net-next RFC] selftests: net: add netpoll basic functionality test Breno Leitao
2025-06-13 2:35 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-06-13 12:47 ` Breno Leitao
2025-06-13 13:43 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-06-13 14:07 ` Breno Leitao
2025-06-14 0:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-06-20 8:39 ` Breno Leitao
2025-06-21 13:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-06-23 9:16 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2025-06-23 17:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-06-23 17:44 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFkbXFvOKeMALwBg@gmail.com \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.