From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Daniel Díaz" <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/defconfigs: Explicitly unset CONFIG_64BIT in i386_defconfig
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 12:21:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFkcf6it0bW36jdw@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250623090642.GAaFkZIq__HR0FJE-0@fat_crate.local>
On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 11:06:42AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 10:25:36AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > From: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>
> >
> > A recent refresh of the defconfigs got rid of the following
> > (unset) config:
> >
> > # CONFIG_64BIT is not set
> >
> > Innocuous as it seems, when the config file is saved again the
> > behavior is changed so that CONFIG_64BIT=y.
> >
> > Currently,
> >
> > $ make i386_defconfig
> > $ grep CONFIG_64BIT .config
> > CONFIG_64BIT=y
> >
> > whereas previously (and with this patch):
> >
> > $ make i386_defconfig
> > $ grep CONFIG_64BIT .config
> > # CONFIG_64BIT is not set
> >
> > Fixes: 0e11f689ec03 ("x86/kconfig/32: Refresh defconfig")
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> No SOB by Daniel?
Ah, this is just a cherry-pick (with fixing conflicts, updated Fixes
and removed the last paragraph) of 5y.o. 76366050eb1b ("x86/defconfigs:
Explicitly unset CONFIG_64BIT in i386_defconfig"), it should be standalone
patch. I borrowed the commit message. So, whatever you prefer: I can send
it again as the original one, one of x86 maintainers can do themselves
the cherry-picking / conflict resolution, or I can resend it as mine.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-23 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-23 7:25 [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/defconfigs: Explicitly unset CONFIG_64BIT in i386_defconfig Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-23 9:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-06-23 9:21 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-06-23 9:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-06-23 9:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-23 9:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFkcf6it0bW36jdw@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=daniel.diaz@linaro.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.