Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/defconfigs: Explicitly unset CONFIG_64BIT in i386_defconfig

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 12:46:45PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 11:31:56AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 12:21:03PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > Ah, this is just a cherry-pick (with fixing conflicts, updated Fixes
> > > and removed the last paragraph) of 5y.o. 76366050eb1b ("x86/defconfigs:
> > > Explicitly unset CONFIG_64BIT in i386_defconfig"),
> > 
>> >  > What?

FWIW< the bug is repetitive (third time already?) that the i386_defconfig was
refreshed with ARCH=x86_64 or so and in the result the CONFIG_64BIT is set to
'y' for 32-bit code.

> > A 5yo patch cherrypicked from somewhere has as a Fixes tag a patch from 10
> > days ago?!?!
> 
> The base for my patch was the 5.y.o. patch.
> 
> > > it should be standalone patch. I borrowed the commit message.  So, whatever
> > > you prefer: I can send it again as the original one, one of x86 maintainers
> > > can do themselves the cherry-picking / conflict resolution, or I can resend
> > > it as mine.
> > 
> > You should do a proper patch as it is done and not do a mish-mash of old and
> > new things, clarify with Daniel who's going to be the author and you should
> > write a commit message which explains the situation properly, not borrow one.
> 
> It is describes situation properly. Just a test was different in this case.
> Okay, let me try again in v2.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko