All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: aeh@meta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, jhs@mojatatu.com,
	kernel-team@meta.com, Erik Lundgren <elundgren@meta.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: Speed up lockdep_unregister_key() with expedited RCU synchronization
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 03:00:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aG49yaIcCPML9GsC@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250321-lockdep-v1-1-78b732d195fb@debian.org>

Hello Waiman, Boqun,

On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 02:30:49AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> lockdep_unregister_key() is called from critical code paths, including
> sections where rtnl_lock() is held. For example, when replacing a qdisc
> in a network device, network egress traffic is disabled while
> __qdisc_destroy() is called for every network queue.
> 
> If lockdep is enabled, __qdisc_destroy() calls lockdep_unregister_key(),
> which gets blocked waiting for synchronize_rcu() to complete.
> 
> For example, a simple tc command to replace a qdisc could take 13
> seconds:
> 
>   # time /usr/sbin/tc qdisc replace dev eth0 root handle 0x1: mq
>     real    0m13.195s
>     user    0m0.001s
>     sys     0m2.746s
> 
> During this time, network egress is completely frozen while waiting for
> RCU synchronization.
> 
> Use synchronize_rcu_expedited() instead to minimize the impact on
> critical operations like network connectivity changes.
> 
> This improves 10x the function call to tc, when replacing the qdisc for
> a network card.
> 
>    # time /usr/sbin/tc qdisc replace dev eth0 root handle 0x1: mq
>      real     0m1.789s
>      user     0m0.000s
>      sys      0m1.613s

Can I have this landed as a workaround for the problem above, while
hazard pointers doesn't get merged?

This is affecting some systems that runs the Linus' upstream kernel with
some debug flags enabled, and I would like to have they unblocked.

Once hazard pointer lands, this will be reverted. Is this a fair
approach?

Thanks for your help,
--breno

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-09 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-21  9:30 [PATCH] lockdep: Speed up lockdep_unregister_key() with expedited RCU synchronization Breno Leitao
2025-03-21 10:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-03-21 14:22   ` Breno Leitao
2025-03-24 12:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-24 12:23   ` Eric Dumazet
2025-03-24 12:24     ` Eric Dumazet
2025-03-24 19:21     ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-24 19:30       ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-25  0:47         ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-25  1:56           ` Waiman Long
2025-03-25  3:41             ` Boqun Feng
     [not found]               ` <934d794b-7ebc-422c-b4fe-3e658a2e5e7a@redhat.com>
2025-03-25 14:57                 ` Waiman Long
2025-03-25 18:45                 ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-25 19:23                   ` Waiman Long
2025-03-25 19:42                     ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-25 23:20                       ` Waiman Long
2025-03-26  5:25                         ` Boqun Feng
     [not found]                           ` <df237702-55c3-466b-b51e-f3fe46ae03ba@redhat.com>
2025-03-26 16:40                             ` Waiman Long
2025-03-26 16:47                               ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-26 17:02                                 ` Waiman Long
2025-03-26 17:10                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-03-26 18:42                                     ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-26 21:37                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-03-31 16:48                                       ` Breno Leitao
2025-03-31 17:34                                         ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-31 17:26                             ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-31 17:33                               ` Waiman Long
2025-03-31 18:33                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-03-31 18:57                                   ` Waiman Long
2025-03-31 21:21                                     ` Boqun Feng
2025-03-31 21:47                                       ` Waiman Long
2025-03-31 17:42                               ` Eric Dumazet
2025-07-09 10:00 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2025-07-09 13:57   ` Waiman Long
2025-07-09 14:57     ` Boqun Feng
2025-07-19 17:40 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Breno Leitao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aG49yaIcCPML9GsC@gmail.com \
    --to=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=aeh@meta.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=elundgren@meta.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.