Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] ixgbe: fix ndo_xdp_xmit() workloads

[Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>]

On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 03:06:29PM +0200, Marcus Wichelmann wrote:
> Am 29.04.25 um 17:52 schrieb Maciej Fijalkowski:
> > Currently ixgbe driver checks periodically in its watchdog subtask if
> > there is anything to be transmitted (consdidering both Tx and XDP rings)
> > under state of carrier not being 'ok'. Such event is interpreted as Tx
> > hang and therefore results in interface reset.
> > 
> > This is currently problematic for ndo_xdp_xmit() as it is allowed to
> > produce descriptors when interface is going through reset or its carrier
> > is turned off.
> > 
> > Furthermore, XDP rings should not really be objects of Tx hang
> > detection. This mechanism is rather a matter of ndo_tx_timeout() being
> > called from dev_watchdog against Tx rings exposed to networking stack.
> > 
> > Taking into account issues described above, let us have a two fold fix -
> > do not respect XDP rings in local ixgbe watchdog and do not produce Tx
> > descriptors in ndo_xdp_xmit callback when there is some problem with
> > carrier currently. For now, keep the Tx hang checks in clean Tx irq
> > routine, but adjust it to not execute it for XDP rings.
> > 
> > Cc: Tobias Böhm <tobias.boehm@hetzner-cloud.de>
> > Reported-by: Marcus Wichelmann <marcus.wichelmann@hetzner-cloud.de>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/eca1880f-253a-4955-afe6-732d7c6926ee@hetzner-cloud.de/
> > Fixes: 6453073987ba ("ixgbe: add initial support for xdp redirect")
> > Fixes: 33fdc82f0883 ("ixgbe: add support for XDP_TX action")
> > Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
> > [...]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> could you please consider submitting this patch (or a newer version)
> for being merged into mainline?
> 
> This would help us not having to build our own kernels with this patch
> for forever.

Somehow I assumed this went through the process and our maintainers took
care of it - apologies for this inconvenience and let me address it.

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Marcus