From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
colyli@kernel.org, hare@suse.de, tieren@fnnas.com,
axboe@kernel.dk, tj@kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com,
song@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, neil@brown.name,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
johnny.chenyi@huawei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/7] md/raid10: convert read/write to use bio_submit_split()
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 00:55:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aK1ocfvjLrIR_Xf2@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c6b183a-bce7-b01c-8749-6e0b5a078384@huaweicloud.com>
On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 09:13:41AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> > The NULL return should only happen for REQ_NOWAIT here, so maybe
> > give R10BIO_Returned a more descriptive name? Also please document
> > the flag in the header.
>
> And also atomic write here, if bio has to split due to badblocks here.
> The flag is refer to raid1. I can add cocument for both raid1 and raid10
> in this case.
Umm, that's actually a red flag. If a device guarantees atomic behavior
it can't just fail it. So I think REQ_ATOMIC should be disallowed
for md raid with bad block tracking.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-26 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-25 9:36 [PATCH RFC 0/7] block: fix disordered IO in the case recursive split Yu Kuai
2025-08-25 9:36 ` [PATCH RFC 1/7] block: export helper bio_submit_split() Yu Kuai
2025-08-25 10:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-26 0:51 ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-25 9:36 ` [PATCH RFC 2/7] md/raid0: convert raid0_handle_discard() to use bio_submit_split() Yu Kuai
2025-08-25 10:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-26 1:08 ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-26 7:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-26 9:11 ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-25 9:36 ` [PATCH RFC 3/7] md/raid1: convert " Yu Kuai
2025-08-25 10:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-26 1:09 ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-25 9:36 ` [PATCH RFC 4/7] md/raid10: convert read/write " Yu Kuai
2025-08-25 10:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-26 1:13 ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-26 7:55 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-08-26 9:14 ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-26 17:35 ` anthony
2025-08-27 7:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-02 6:18 ` John Garry
2025-09-02 6:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-02 6:58 ` John Garry
2025-09-02 8:25 ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-02 14:46 ` John Garry
2025-08-25 9:36 ` [PATCH RFC 5/7] md/raid5: convert " Yu Kuai
2025-08-25 11:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-26 1:15 ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-26 7:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-25 9:36 ` [PATCH RFC 6/7] md/md-linear: " Yu Kuai
2025-08-25 9:37 ` [PATCH RFC 7/7] block: fix disordered IO in the case recursive split Yu Kuai
2025-08-25 11:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-26 1:20 ` Yu Kuai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aK1ocfvjLrIR_Xf2@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=colyli@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=johnny.chenyi@huawei.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tieren@fnnas.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.