Re: [PATCH v15 0/5] rust: adds Bitmap API, ID pool and bindings

[Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>]

(Actually adding Philip in the list.)

On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 09:18:50AM -0400, Yury ooNorov wrote:
> + Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com>
> 
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2025 at 11:29:22AM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 8:02 PM Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Added in bitmap-for-next for testing. Thanks!
> > 
> > linux-next breaks with CONFIG_RUST_BITMAP_HARDENED=y:
> > 
> >      error[E0425]: cannot find function `owned_bitmap_out_of_bounds`
> > in this scope
> >        --> rust/kernel/bitmap.rs:484:1
> >         |
> >     484 | #[kunit_tests(rust_kernel_bitmap)]
> >         | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ not found in this scope
> > 
> > because the proc macro doesn't support `cfg`s (moving it below
> > `#[test]` wouldn't work either). I have filled:
> > 
> >     https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1185
> > 
> > so that we don't forget about it.
> > 
> > Meanwhile, I would recommend e.g. moving the `cfg` inside the
> > function, something like:
> > 
> >     diff --git a/rust/kernel/bitmap.rs b/rust/kernel/bitmap.rs
> >     index 6e0824579781..2f00e91e9c35 100644
> >     --- a/rust/kernel/bitmap.rs
> >     +++ b/rust/kernel/bitmap.rs
> >     @@ -551,18 +551,21 @@ fn bitmap_set_clear_find() -> Result<(), AllocError> {
> >              Ok(())
> >          }
> > 
> >     -    #[cfg(not(CONFIG_RUST_BITMAP_HARDENED))]
> >          #[test]
> >          fn owned_bitmap_out_of_bounds() -> Result<(), AllocError> {
> >     -        let mut b = BitmapVec::new(128, GFP_KERNEL)?;
> >     +        #[cfg(not(CONFIG_RUST_BITMAP_HARDENED))]
> >     +        {
> >     +            let mut b = BitmapVec::new(128, GFP_KERNEL)?;
> >     +
> >     +            b.set_bit(2048);
> >     +            b.set_bit_atomic(2048);
> >     +            b.clear_bit(2048);
> >     +            b.clear_bit_atomic(2048);
> >     +            assert_eq!(None, b.next_bit(2048));
> >     +            assert_eq!(None, b.next_zero_bit(2048));
> >     +            assert_eq!(None, b.last_bit());
> >     +        }
> > 
> >     -        b.set_bit(2048);
> >     -        b.set_bit_atomic(2048);
> >     -        b.clear_bit(2048);
> >     -        b.clear_bit_atomic(2048);
> >     -        assert_eq!(None, b.next_bit(2048));
> >     -        assert_eq!(None, b.next_zero_bit(2048));
> >     -        assert_eq!(None, b.last_bit());
> >              Ok(())
> >          }
> 
> Thanks for the testing, Miguel! I've folded-in your fix and added
> your co-developed-by tag. Please let me know if it doesn't work for
> you.
> 
> Philip, is it possible to add CONFIG_RUST_BITMAP_HARDENED=y/n in your
> testing too?
> 
> Thanks,
> Yury