All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: "Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Hubert Wiśniewski" <hubert.wisniewski.25632@gmail.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>, "Xu Yang" <xu.yang_2@nxp.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1 1/1] net: usb: asix: ax88772: drop phylink use in PM to avoid MDIO runtime PM wakeups
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 21:46:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMM1K_bkk4clt5WD@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250911075513.1d90f8b0@kernel.org>

On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 07:55:13AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 15:39:20 +0100 Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > I'm not surprised. I'm guessing phylib is using polled mode, and
> > removing the suspend/resume handling likely means that it's at the
> > mercy of the timings of the phylib state machine running (which is
> > what is complaining here) vs the MDIO bus being available for use.
> > 
> > Given that this happens, I'm convinced that the original patch is
> > the wrong approach. The driver needs the phylink suspend/resume
> > calls to shutdown and restart phylib polling, and the resume call
> > needs to be placed in such a location that the MDIO bus is already
> > accessible.
> 
> We keep having issues with rtnl_lock taken from resume.
> Honestly, I'm not sure anyone has found a good solution, yet.
> Mostly people just don't implement runtime PM.
> 
> If we were able to pass optional context to suspend/resume
> we could implement conditional locking. We'd lose a lot of
> self-respect but it'd make fixing such bugs easier..

Normal drivers have the option of separate callbacks for runtime PM
vs system suspend/resume states. It seems USB doesn't, just munging
everything into one pair of suspend and resume ops without any way
of telling them apart. I suggest that is part of the problem here.

However, I'm not a USB expert, so...

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-11 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20250911135853eucas1p283b1afd37287b715403cd2cdbfa03a94@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2025-09-08 11:26 ` [PATCH net v1 1/1] net: usb: asix: ax88772: drop phylink use in PM to avoid MDIO runtime PM wakeups Oleksij Rempel
2025-09-08 17:00   ` Hubert Wiśniewski
2025-09-09  7:17     ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-09-09 23:56       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-10  4:16         ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-09-09  2:05   ` Xu Yang
2025-09-09 23:58   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-10  4:11     ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-09-11  0:50       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-11  1:00   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2025-09-11 13:58   ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-09-11 14:39     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-09-11 14:55       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-11 20:46         ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2025-09-12  2:30           ` Alan Stern
2025-09-12  8:33             ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-09-12 14:29               ` Alan Stern
2025-09-12 14:37                 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-09-13  6:45                   ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-09-16  7:18                     ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-09-16 14:42                       ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aMM1K_bkk4clt5WD@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hubert.wisniewski.25632@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xu.yang_2@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.