All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: wangzijie <wangzijie1@honor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: add sanity check on ei.len in __update_extent_tree_range()
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 16:40:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMrkjSRJ0yyEfvfl@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916085243.4165099-1-chao@kernel.org>

Do we need this?

On 09/16, Chao Yu wrote:
> Add a sanity check in __update_extent_tree_range() to detect any
> zero-sized extent update.
> 
> Signed-off-by: wangzijie <wangzijie1@honor.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> index 199c1e7a83ef..3070d1cb0676 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> @@ -664,6 +664,15 @@ static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
>  	if (!et)
>  		return;
>  
> +	if (unlikely(len == 0)) {
> +		f2fs_err_ratelimited(sbi, "%s: extent len is zero, type: %d, "
> +			"extent [%u, %u, %u], age [%llu, %llu]",
> +			__func__, type, tei->fofs, tei->blk, tei->len,
> +			tei->age, tei->last_blocks);
> +		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (type == EX_READ)
>  		trace_f2fs_update_read_extent_tree_range(inode, fofs, len,
>  						tei->blk, 0);
> -- 
> 2.49.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wangzijie <wangzijie1@honor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: add sanity check on ei.len in __update_extent_tree_range()
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 16:40:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMrkjSRJ0yyEfvfl@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916085243.4165099-1-chao@kernel.org>

Do we need this?

On 09/16, Chao Yu wrote:
> Add a sanity check in __update_extent_tree_range() to detect any
> zero-sized extent update.
> 
> Signed-off-by: wangzijie <wangzijie1@honor.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> index 199c1e7a83ef..3070d1cb0676 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
> @@ -664,6 +664,15 @@ static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
>  	if (!et)
>  		return;
>  
> +	if (unlikely(len == 0)) {
> +		f2fs_err_ratelimited(sbi, "%s: extent len is zero, type: %d, "
> +			"extent [%u, %u, %u], age [%llu, %llu]",
> +			__func__, type, tei->fofs, tei->blk, tei->len,
> +			tei->age, tei->last_blocks);
> +		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (type == EX_READ)
>  		trace_f2fs_update_read_extent_tree_range(inode, fofs, len,
>  						tei->blk, 0);
> -- 
> 2.49.0

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-17 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-16  8:52 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: add sanity check on ei.len in __update_extent_tree_range() Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-09-16  8:52 ` Chao Yu
2025-09-17 16:40 ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2025-09-17 16:40   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2025-09-18  2:15   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-09-18  2:15     ` Chao Yu
2025-09-29 22:30 ` [f2fs-dev] " patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel
2025-09-29 22:30   ` patchwork-bot+f2fs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aMrkjSRJ0yyEfvfl@google.com \
    --to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wangzijie1@honor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.