* [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: consistently use bpf_rcu_lock_held() everywhere
@ 2025-10-14 20:14 Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-15 9:27 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-10-15 10:31 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrii Nakryiko @ 2025-10-14 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf, ast, daniel, martin.lau; +Cc: andrii, kernel-team
We have many places which open-code what's now is bpf_rcu_lock_held()
macro, so replace all those places with a clean and short macro invocation.
For that, move bpf_rcu_lock_held() macro into include/linux/bpf.h.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
v1->v2:
- move bpf_rcu_lock_held() outside of #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL area (kernel
test robot).
include/linux/bpf.h | 3 +++
include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h | 3 ---
kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 21 +++++++--------------
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 12 ++++--------
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index f87fb203aaae..86afd9ac6848 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2381,6 +2381,9 @@ bpf_prog_run_array_uprobe(const struct bpf_prog_array *array,
bool bpf_jit_bypass_spec_v1(void);
bool bpf_jit_bypass_spec_v4(void);
+#define bpf_rcu_lock_held() \
+ (rcu_read_lock_held() || rcu_read_lock_trace_held() || rcu_read_lock_bh_held())
+
#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_prog_active);
extern struct mutex bpf_stats_enabled_mutex;
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
index ab7244d8108f..782f58feea35 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
@@ -18,9 +18,6 @@
#define BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_CACHE_SIZE 16
-#define bpf_rcu_lock_held() \
- (rcu_read_lock_held() || rcu_read_lock_trace_held() || \
- rcu_read_lock_bh_held())
struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket {
struct hlist_head list;
raw_spinlock_t lock;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
index e7a6ba04dc82..f876f09355f0 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
@@ -657,8 +657,7 @@ static void *__htab_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
struct htab_elem *l;
u32 hash, key_size;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
key_size = map->key_size;
@@ -1086,8 +1085,7 @@ static long htab_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
/* unknown flags */
return -EINVAL;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
key_size = map->key_size;
@@ -1194,8 +1192,7 @@ static long htab_lru_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value
/* unknown flags */
return -EINVAL;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
key_size = map->key_size;
@@ -1263,8 +1260,7 @@ static long htab_map_update_elem_in_place(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
/* unknown flags */
return -EINVAL;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
key_size = map->key_size;
@@ -1326,8 +1322,7 @@ static long __htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
/* unknown flags */
return -EINVAL;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
key_size = map->key_size;
@@ -1404,8 +1399,7 @@ static long htab_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
u32 hash, key_size;
int ret;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
key_size = map->key_size;
@@ -1440,8 +1434,7 @@ static long htab_lru_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
u32 hash, key_size;
int ret;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
key_size = map->key_size;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index dea8443f782c..825280c953be 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -42,8 +42,7 @@
*/
BPF_CALL_2(bpf_map_lookup_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key)
{
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
return (unsigned long) map->ops->map_lookup_elem(map, key);
}
@@ -59,8 +58,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto = {
BPF_CALL_4(bpf_map_update_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key,
void *, value, u64, flags)
{
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
return map->ops->map_update_elem(map, key, value, flags);
}
@@ -77,8 +75,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_update_elem_proto = {
BPF_CALL_2(bpf_map_delete_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key)
{
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
return map->ops->map_delete_elem(map, key);
}
@@ -134,8 +131,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_peek_elem_proto = {
BPF_CALL_3(bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key, u32, cpu)
{
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
- !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
return (unsigned long) map->ops->map_lookup_percpu_elem(map, key, cpu);
}
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: consistently use bpf_rcu_lock_held() everywhere
2025-10-14 20:14 [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: consistently use bpf_rcu_lock_held() everywhere Andrii Nakryiko
@ 2025-10-15 9:27 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-10-15 10:31 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2025-10-15 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrii Nakryiko; +Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, martin.lau, kernel-team
On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 01:14:03PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> We have many places which open-code what's now is bpf_rcu_lock_held()
> macro, so replace all those places with a clean and short macro invocation.
> For that, move bpf_rcu_lock_held() macro into include/linux/bpf.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
jirka
> ---
> v1->v2:
> - move bpf_rcu_lock_held() outside of #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL area (kernel
> test robot).
>
> include/linux/bpf.h | 3 +++
> include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h | 3 ---
> kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 21 +++++++--------------
> kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 12 ++++--------
> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index f87fb203aaae..86afd9ac6848 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -2381,6 +2381,9 @@ bpf_prog_run_array_uprobe(const struct bpf_prog_array *array,
> bool bpf_jit_bypass_spec_v1(void);
> bool bpf_jit_bypass_spec_v4(void);
>
> +#define bpf_rcu_lock_held() \
> + (rcu_read_lock_held() || rcu_read_lock_trace_held() || rcu_read_lock_bh_held())
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, bpf_prog_active);
> extern struct mutex bpf_stats_enabled_mutex;
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
> index ab7244d8108f..782f58feea35 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h
> @@ -18,9 +18,6 @@
>
> #define BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_CACHE_SIZE 16
>
> -#define bpf_rcu_lock_held() \
> - (rcu_read_lock_held() || rcu_read_lock_trace_held() || \
> - rcu_read_lock_bh_held())
> struct bpf_local_storage_map_bucket {
> struct hlist_head list;
> raw_spinlock_t lock;
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> index e7a6ba04dc82..f876f09355f0 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> @@ -657,8 +657,7 @@ static void *__htab_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
> struct htab_elem *l;
> u32 hash, key_size;
>
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
> - !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
>
> key_size = map->key_size;
>
> @@ -1086,8 +1085,7 @@ static long htab_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
> /* unknown flags */
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
> - !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
>
> key_size = map->key_size;
>
> @@ -1194,8 +1192,7 @@ static long htab_lru_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value
> /* unknown flags */
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
> - !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
>
> key_size = map->key_size;
>
> @@ -1263,8 +1260,7 @@ static long htab_map_update_elem_in_place(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
> /* unknown flags */
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
> - !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
>
> key_size = map->key_size;
>
> @@ -1326,8 +1322,7 @@ static long __htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
> /* unknown flags */
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
> - !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
>
> key_size = map->key_size;
>
> @@ -1404,8 +1399,7 @@ static long htab_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
> u32 hash, key_size;
> int ret;
>
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
> - !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
>
> key_size = map->key_size;
>
> @@ -1440,8 +1434,7 @@ static long htab_lru_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
> u32 hash, key_size;
> int ret;
>
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
> - !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
>
> key_size = map->key_size;
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> index dea8443f782c..825280c953be 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> @@ -42,8 +42,7 @@
> */
> BPF_CALL_2(bpf_map_lookup_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key)
> {
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
> - !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
> return (unsigned long) map->ops->map_lookup_elem(map, key);
> }
>
> @@ -59,8 +58,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_lookup_elem_proto = {
> BPF_CALL_4(bpf_map_update_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key,
> void *, value, u64, flags)
> {
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
> - !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
> return map->ops->map_update_elem(map, key, value, flags);
> }
>
> @@ -77,8 +75,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_update_elem_proto = {
>
> BPF_CALL_2(bpf_map_delete_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key)
> {
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
> - !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
> return map->ops->map_delete_elem(map, key);
> }
>
> @@ -134,8 +131,7 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_map_peek_elem_proto = {
>
> BPF_CALL_3(bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem, struct bpf_map *, map, void *, key, u32, cpu)
> {
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !rcu_read_lock_trace_held() &&
> - !rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_rcu_lock_held());
> return (unsigned long) map->ops->map_lookup_percpu_elem(map, key, cpu);
> }
>
> --
> 2.47.3
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: consistently use bpf_rcu_lock_held() everywhere
2025-10-14 20:14 [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: consistently use bpf_rcu_lock_held() everywhere Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-15 9:27 ` Jiri Olsa
@ 2025-10-15 10:31 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2025-10-15 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrii Nakryiko; +Cc: bpf, ast, daniel, martin.lau, kernel-team
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 13:14:03 -0700 you wrote:
> We have many places which open-code what's now is bpf_rcu_lock_held()
> macro, so replace all those places with a clean and short macro invocation.
> For that, move bpf_rcu_lock_held() macro into include/linux/bpf.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> ---
> v1->v2:
> - move bpf_rcu_lock_held() outside of #ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL area (kernel
> test robot).
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v2,bpf-next] bpf: consistently use bpf_rcu_lock_held() everywhere
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/48a97ffc6c82
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-15 10:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-10-14 20:14 [PATCH v2 bpf-next] bpf: consistently use bpf_rcu_lock_held() everywhere Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-15 9:27 ` Jiri Olsa
2025-10-15 10:31 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.