From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sdubroca@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@gmail.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
bridge@lists.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 net-next 1/4] net: add a common function to compute features from lowers devices
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 12:38:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPDnN072argrq23q@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <to4zjjo5wfd5suootcy2v7n7kuc6rym3ld4jov26nunnarji2u@2hr7jyiq36pj>
On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 01:27:00PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> How about "master_upper"? This is already widely used to refer to
> >> bond/team/bridge/other master soft devices.
> >>
> >> MASTER_UPPER_DEV_VLAN_FEATURES?
> >
> >I'm not sure if we should avoid using "master" now. Maybe just UPPER_DEV_VLAN_FEATURES?
>
> Why? We have "master_upper" to point exactly at this kind of device.
I mean try not use "master/slave" words. I'm OK to use UPPER_DEV_* prefix.
I will update the name if there is a next version.
Thanks
Hangbin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-16 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-14 8:02 [PATCHv4 net-next 0/4] net: common feature compute for upper interface Hangbin Liu
2025-10-14 8:02 ` [PATCHv4 net-next 1/4] net: add a common function to compute features from lowers devices Hangbin Liu
2025-10-14 9:40 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-10-15 1:25 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-10-16 11:27 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-10-16 12:38 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2025-10-16 13:24 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-10-17 2:53 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-10-14 14:02 ` Simon Horman
2025-10-15 3:03 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-10-14 8:02 ` [PATCHv4 net-next 2/4] bonding: use common function to compute the features Hangbin Liu
2025-10-14 8:02 ` [PATCHv4 net-next 3/4] team: " Hangbin Liu
2025-10-14 8:02 ` [PATCHv4 net-next 4/4] net: bridge: " Hangbin Liu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-10-16 23:51 [PATCHv4 net-next 1/4] net: add a common function to compute features from lowers devices kernel test robot
2025-10-19 5:52 kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPDnN072argrq23q@fedora \
--to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=sdubroca@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.