From: Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] gpio: bt8xx: use generic PCI PM
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 16:37:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPEfR_lwO1i2wGYb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251013174319.GA847155@bhelgaas>
On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 12:43:19PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 03:52:59PM +0000, Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
> > Switch to the new generic PCI power management framework and remove legacy
> > callbacks like .suspend() and .resume(). With the generic framework, the
> > standard PCI related work like:
> > - pci_save/restore_state()
> > - pci_enable/disable_device()
> > - pci_set_power_state()
> > is handled by the PCI core and this driver should implement only gpio-bt8xx
> > specific operations in its respective callback functions.
>
> Tiny nits:
>
> s/use generic PCI PM/use generic power management/ # subject; not PCI
> s/new generic PCI power/generic power management/ # no longer "new" :)
>
> > Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c | 29 +++++++----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c
> > index 05401da03ca3..70b49c385b43 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c
> > @@ -52,10 +52,8 @@ struct bt8xxgpio {
> > struct pci_dev *pdev;
> > struct gpio_chip gpio;
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > u32 saved_outen;
> > u32 saved_data;
> > -#endif
> > };
> >
> > #define bgwrite(dat, adr) writel((dat), bg->mmio+(adr))
> > @@ -224,9 +222,9 @@ static void bt8xxgpio_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > pci_disable_device(pdev);
> > }
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > -static int bt8xxgpio_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
> > +static int __maybe_unused bt8xxgpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
>
> I think __maybe_unused is unnecessary because of this path:
>
> DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS
> _DEFINE_DEV_PM_OPS
> SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS
> pm_sleep_ptr
> PTR_IF(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP), (_ptr))
>
> Detailed explanation here:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/linux/util_macros.h?id=v6.17#n86
>
Fixed them in v6.
> > {
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > struct bt8xxgpio *bg = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >
> > scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &bg->lock) {
>
> Unrelated to this patch, but it's not clear to me why bg->lock is
> needed here (or maybe anywhere).
>
> $ git grep -l "static int.*_suspend" drivers/gpio | wc -l
> 26
> $ git grep -W "static int.*_suspend" drivers/gpio | grep lock | grep -v unlock | wc -l
>
> It looks like only about 8 of the 26 gpio drivers that implement
> .suspend() protect it with a lock. I would expect a lock to be needed
> in all of them or none of them.
>
I can have a look at them.
regards,
Vaibhav
> > @@ -238,23 +236,13 @@ static int bt8xxgpio_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
> > bgwrite(0x0, BT848_GPIO_OUT_EN);
> > }
> >
> > - pci_save_state(pdev);
> > - pci_disable_device(pdev);
> > - pci_set_power_state(pdev, pci_choose_state(pdev, state));
> > -
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int bt8xxgpio_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +static int __maybe_unused bt8xxgpio_resume(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > struct bt8xxgpio *bg = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > - int err;
> > -
> > - pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D0);
> > - err = pci_enable_device(pdev);
> > - if (err)
> > - return err;
> > - pci_restore_state(pdev);
> >
> > guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&bg->lock);
> >
> > @@ -267,10 +255,8 @@ static int bt8xxgpio_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > -#else
> > -#define bt8xxgpio_suspend NULL
> > -#define bt8xxgpio_resume NULL
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
> > +
> > +static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(bt8xxgpio_pm_ops, bt8xxgpio_suspend, bt8xxgpio_resume);
> >
> > static const struct pci_device_id bt8xxgpio_pci_tbl[] = {
> > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROOKTREE, PCI_DEVICE_ID_BT848) },
> > @@ -286,8 +272,7 @@ static struct pci_driver bt8xxgpio_pci_driver = {
> > .id_table = bt8xxgpio_pci_tbl,
> > .probe = bt8xxgpio_probe,
> > .remove = bt8xxgpio_remove,
> > - .suspend = bt8xxgpio_suspend,
> > - .resume = bt8xxgpio_resume,
> > + .driver.pm = &bt8xxgpio_pm_ops,
> > };
> >
> > module_pci_driver(bt8xxgpio_pci_driver);
> > --
> > 2.51.0
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-16 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-10 10:53 [PATCH v1] driver: gpio-bt8xx: use generic PCI PM Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-11 1:43 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-11 10:26 ` Michael Büsch
2025-10-11 11:32 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-11 12:31 ` Michael Büsch
2025-10-11 12:37 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-11 12:57 ` [PATCH v3] " Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-13 11:04 ` [PATCH v4] driver: gpio: bt8xx: " Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-11 12:32 ` [PATCH v2] driver: gpio-bt8xx: " Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-13 9:41 ` [PATCH v1] " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-13 11:03 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-13 15:36 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-13 15:51 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-13 15:52 ` [PATCH v5] gpio: bt8xx: " Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-13 17:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-16 16:36 ` [PATCH v6] gpio: bt8xx: use generic power management Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-21 8:48 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-22 19:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-23 7:49 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-23 7:55 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-23 7:58 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-23 7:59 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-16 16:37 ` Vaibhav Gupta [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPEfR_lwO1i2wGYb@gmail.com \
--to=vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m@bues.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.