Re: [PATCH v6] gpio: bt8xx: use generic power management

[Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com>]

> > 
> > This says it's a v6 but I have no idea what changed since v1. Please
> > provide a changelog for every version when submitting patches.
> > 
> > Bjorn: does this look good to you?
> 
> Yes, it looks good to me.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> 
> FWIW, here's the diff from v1 to v6.  Mostly just iterating on
> compile warning nits:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c
> index e8d0c67bb618..324eeb77dbd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c
> @@ -52,10 +52,8 @@ struct bt8xxgpio {
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev;
>  	struct gpio_chip gpio;
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>  	u32 saved_outen;
>  	u32 saved_data;
> -#endif
>  };
>  
>  #define bgwrite(dat, adr)	writel((dat), bg->mmio+(adr))
> @@ -224,7 +222,8 @@ static void bt8xxgpio_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	pci_disable_device(pdev);
>  }
>  
> -static int __maybe_unused bt8xxgpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +
> +static int bt8xxgpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>  	struct bt8xxgpio *bg = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> @@ -241,7 +240,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused bt8xxgpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int __maybe_unused bt8xxgpio_resume(struct device *dev)
> +static int bt8xxgpio_resume(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>  	struct bt8xxgpio *bg = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> @@ -258,7 +257,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused bt8xxgpio_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(bt8xxgpio_pm_ops, bt8xxgpio_suspend, bt8xxgpio_resume);
> +static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(bt8xxgpio_pm_ops, bt8xxgpio_suspend, bt8xxgpio_resume);
>  
>  static const struct pci_device_id bt8xxgpio_pci_tbl[] = {
>  	{ PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROOKTREE, PCI_DEVICE_ID_BT848) },

Hello Bjorn!
Thanks for the review and mentioning the diff between v1 and v6.

Hey Randy!
Please let me know if the diff mentioned by Bjorn is enough or should I send a
new patch-mail describing the v1-v6 diff?

Best regards,
Vaibhav