* [PATCH v2] exfat: fix refcount leak in exfat_find
@ 2025-10-21 8:42 Shuhao Fu
2025-10-21 9:20 ` Markus Elfring
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Shuhao Fu @ 2025-10-21 8:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Namjae Jeon, Sungjong Seo; +Cc: Yuezhang Mo, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel
Fix refcount leaks in `exfat_find` related to `exfat_get_dentry_set`.
Function `exfat_get_dentry_set` would increase the reference counter of
`es->bh` on success. Therefore, `exfat_put_dentry_set` must be called
after `exfat_get_dentry_set` to ensure refcount consistency. This patch
relocate two checks to avoid possible leaks.
Fixes: 82ebecdc74ff ("exfat: fix improper check of dentry.stream.valid_size")
Fixes: 13940cef9549 ("exfat: add a check for invalid data size")
Signed-off-by: Shuhao Fu <sfual@cse.ust.hk>
---
Change to v1: [1]
- relocate two checks
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/aPZOpRfVPZCP8vPw@chcpu18/
---
fs/exfat/namei.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/exfat/namei.c b/fs/exfat/namei.c
index 745dce29d..dfe957493 100644
--- a/fs/exfat/namei.c
+++ b/fs/exfat/namei.c
@@ -645,16 +645,6 @@ static int exfat_find(struct inode *dir, const struct qstr *qname,
info->valid_size = le64_to_cpu(ep2->dentry.stream.valid_size);
info->size = le64_to_cpu(ep2->dentry.stream.size);
- if (info->valid_size < 0) {
- exfat_fs_error(sb, "data valid size is invalid(%lld)", info->valid_size);
- return -EIO;
- }
-
- if (unlikely(EXFAT_B_TO_CLU_ROUND_UP(info->size, sbi) > sbi->used_clusters)) {
- exfat_fs_error(sb, "data size is invalid(%lld)", info->size);
- return -EIO;
- }
-
info->start_clu = le32_to_cpu(ep2->dentry.stream.start_clu);
if (!is_valid_cluster(sbi, info->start_clu) && info->size) {
exfat_warn(sb, "start_clu is invalid cluster(0x%x)",
@@ -692,6 +682,16 @@ static int exfat_find(struct inode *dir, const struct qstr *qname,
0);
exfat_put_dentry_set(&es, false);
+ if (info->valid_size < 0) {
+ exfat_fs_error(sb, "data valid size is invalid(%lld)", info->valid_size);
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
+ if (unlikely(EXFAT_B_TO_CLU_ROUND_UP(info->size, sbi) > sbi->used_clusters)) {
+ exfat_fs_error(sb, "data size is invalid(%lld)", info->size);
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
if (ei->start_clu == EXFAT_FREE_CLUSTER) {
exfat_fs_error(sb,
"non-zero size file starts with zero cluster (size : %llu, p_dir : %u, entry : 0x%08x)",
--
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] exfat: fix refcount leak in exfat_find
2025-10-21 8:42 [PATCH v2] exfat: fix refcount leak in exfat_find Shuhao Fu
@ 2025-10-21 9:20 ` Markus Elfring
2025-10-22 4:55 ` Yuezhang.Mo
2025-10-22 5:41 ` Namjae Jeon
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Markus Elfring @ 2025-10-21 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shuhao Fu, linux-fsdevel, Namjae Jeon, Sungjong Seo; +Cc: LKML, Yuezhang Mo
…
> Function `exfat_get_dentry_set` would increase the reference counter of
> `es->bh` on success. Therefore, `exfat_put_dentry_set` must be called
> after `exfat_get_dentry_set` to ensure refcount consistency. This patch
> relocate two checks to avoid possible leaks.
…
* Would it be preferred to refer to the term “reference count” in consistent ways?
* I see possibilities to improve such a change description another bit.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.18-rc1#n94
Regards,
Markus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] exfat: fix refcount leak in exfat_find
2025-10-21 8:42 [PATCH v2] exfat: fix refcount leak in exfat_find Shuhao Fu
2025-10-21 9:20 ` Markus Elfring
@ 2025-10-22 4:55 ` Yuezhang.Mo
2025-10-22 5:41 ` Namjae Jeon
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yuezhang.Mo @ 2025-10-22 4:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shuhao Fu, Namjae Jeon, Sungjong Seo
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 16:42 Shuhao Fu <sfual@cse.ust.hk> wrote:
> Fix refcount leaks in `exfat_find` related to `exfat_get_dentry_set`.
>
> Function `exfat_get_dentry_set` would increase the reference counter of
> `es->bh` on success. Therefore, `exfat_put_dentry_set` must be called
> after `exfat_get_dentry_set` to ensure refcount consistency. This patch
> relocate two checks to avoid possible leaks.
>
> Fixes: 82ebecdc74ff ("exfat: fix improper check of dentry.stream.valid_size")
> Fixes: 13940cef9549 ("exfat: add a check for invalid data size")
> Signed-off-by: Shuhao Fu <sfual@cse.ust.hk>
> ---
> Change to v1: [1]
> - relocate two checks
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/aPZOpRfVPZCP8vPw@chcpu18/
> ---
> fs/exfat/namei.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/exfat/namei.c b/fs/exfat/namei.c
> index 745dce29d..dfe957493 100644
> --- a/fs/exfat/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/exfat/namei.c
> @@ -645,16 +645,6 @@ static int exfat_find(struct inode *dir, const struct qstr *qname,
> info->valid_size = le64_to_cpu(ep2->dentry.stream.valid_size);
> info->size = le64_to_cpu(ep2->dentry.stream.size);
>
> - if (info->valid_size < 0) {
> - exfat_fs_error(sb, "data valid size is invalid(%lld)", info->valid_size);
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> -
> - if (unlikely(EXFAT_B_TO_CLU_ROUND_UP(info->size, sbi) > sbi->used_clusters)) {
> - exfat_fs_error(sb, "data size is invalid(%lld)", info->size);
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> -
> info->start_clu = le32_to_cpu(ep2->dentry.stream.start_clu);
> if (!is_valid_cluster(sbi, info->start_clu) && info->size) {
> exfat_warn(sb, "start_clu is invalid cluster(0x%x)",
> @@ -692,6 +682,16 @@ static int exfat_find(struct inode *dir, const struct qstr *qname,
> 0);
> exfat_put_dentry_set(&es, false);
>
> + if (info->valid_size < 0) {
> + exfat_fs_error(sb, "data valid size is invalid(%lld)", info->valid_size);
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + if (unlikely(EXFAT_B_TO_CLU_ROUND_UP(info->size, sbi) > sbi->used_clusters)) {
> + exfat_fs_error(sb, "data size is invalid(%lld)", info->size);
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> if (ei->start_clu == EXFAT_FREE_CLUSTER) {
> exfat_fs_error(sb,
> "non-zero size file starts with zero cluster (size : %llu, p_dir : %u, entry : 0x%08x)",
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>
> --
> 2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] exfat: fix refcount leak in exfat_find
2025-10-21 8:42 [PATCH v2] exfat: fix refcount leak in exfat_find Shuhao Fu
2025-10-21 9:20 ` Markus Elfring
2025-10-22 4:55 ` Yuezhang.Mo
@ 2025-10-22 5:41 ` Namjae Jeon
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Namjae Jeon @ 2025-10-22 5:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shuhao Fu; +Cc: Sungjong Seo, Yuezhang Mo, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel
On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 5:42 PM Shuhao Fu <sfual@cse.ust.hk> wrote:
>
> Fix refcount leaks in `exfat_find` related to `exfat_get_dentry_set`.
>
> Function `exfat_get_dentry_set` would increase the reference counter of
> `es->bh` on success. Therefore, `exfat_put_dentry_set` must be called
> after `exfat_get_dentry_set` to ensure refcount consistency. This patch
> relocate two checks to avoid possible leaks.
>
> Fixes: 82ebecdc74ff ("exfat: fix improper check of dentry.stream.valid_size")
> Fixes: 13940cef9549 ("exfat: add a check for invalid data size")
> Signed-off-by: Shuhao Fu <sfual@cse.ust.hk>
Applied it with a reviewed-by tag to #dev.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-10-22 5:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-10-21 8:42 [PATCH v2] exfat: fix refcount leak in exfat_find Shuhao Fu
2025-10-21 9:20 ` Markus Elfring
2025-10-22 4:55 ` Yuezhang.Mo
2025-10-22 5:41 ` Namjae Jeon
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.