From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, horms@kernel.org,
petrm@nvidia.com, willemb@google.com, daniel@iogearbox.net,
fw@strlen.de, ishaangandhi@gmail.com, rbonica@juniper.net,
tom@herbertland.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] icmp: Add RFC 5837 support
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 14:19:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPoPMXrfAlSnbgA8@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <410cd787-0085-4409-97c1-2019a7baab8b@kernel.org>
On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 11:29:20AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> For the set:
> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Thanks!
> Did you try testing this with an older kernel versions on the receiving
> side of the icmp packet? ie., making sure older code does not have a bad
> reaction to the extra data in the icmp.
I didn't touch the ICMP receive path so I don't expect any regressions
there. The only open question there is if the kernel will be able to
correctly parse the ICMP extensions when the IP{,6}_RECVERR_RFC4884
socket options are used, but like I told Willem, I don't expect any
problems given that traceroute, wireshark and tcpdump parse these
packets just fine [1].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/aPnw2PkF3ZMP9EJr@shredder/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-23 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-22 6:53 [PATCH net-next 0/3] icmp: Add RFC 5837 support Ido Schimmel
2025-10-22 6:53 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] ipv4: " Ido Schimmel
2025-10-22 22:00 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-10-23 8:35 ` Ido Schimmel
2025-10-22 6:53 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] ipv6: " Ido Schimmel
2025-10-22 6:53 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] selftests: traceroute: Add ICMP extensions tests Ido Schimmel
2025-10-22 22:12 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-10-23 9:09 ` Ido Schimmel
2025-10-23 15:39 ` Ido Schimmel
2025-10-23 21:25 ` Willem de Bruijn
2025-10-22 13:26 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] icmp: Add RFC 5837 support Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-22 13:58 ` Ido Schimmel
2025-10-22 15:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-22 15:35 ` Ido Schimmel
2025-10-23 0:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-24 1:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-24 14:50 ` Ido Schimmel
2025-10-24 15:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-22 17:29 ` David Ahern
2025-10-23 11:19 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2025-10-23 13:39 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPoPMXrfAlSnbgA8@shredder \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=ishaangandhi@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=rbonica@juniper.net \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.