All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Johan Jonker" <jbx6244@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] PCI: rockchip-host: drop wait on PERST# toggle
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 00:55:32 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQrKtFT0ldc70gKj@geday> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251103181038.GA1814635@bhelgaas>

On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 12:10:38PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 03:27:25AM -0300, Geraldo Nascimento wrote:
> > With this change PCIe will complete link-training with a known quirky
> > device - Samsung OEM PM981a SSD. This is completely against the PCIe
> > spec and yet it works as long as the power regulator for 3v3 PCIe
> > power is not defined as always-on or boot-on.
> 
> What is against the spec?  In what way is this SSD "known quirky"?  Is
> there a published erratum for it?
> 
> Removing this delay might make this SSD work, but if this delay is
> required per PCIe spec, how can we be confident that other devices
> will still work?
> 
> Reports of devices that still work is not really enough to move this
> from the "hack that makes one device work" column to the "safe and
> effective for all devices" column.
> 
> It's easy to see how *lack* of a delay can break something, but much
> harder to imagine how *removing* a delay can make something work.
> Devices must be able to tolerate pretty much arbitrary delays.

Hi Bjorn!

I did some more testing, intrigued by why would a delay of more than
5 ms after the enablement of the power rails trigger failure in
initial link-training.

Something in my intuition kept telling me this was PERST# related,
and so I followed that rabbit-hole.

It seems the following change will allow the SSD to work with the
Rockchip-IP PCIe core without any other changes. So it is purely
a DT change and we are able to keep the mandatory 100ms delay
after driving PERST# low, as well as the always-on/boot-on
properties of the 3v3 power regulator.

This time everything is within the PCIe spec AFAICT, PERST# indeed
is an Open Drain signal, and indeed it does requires pull-up resistor
to maintain the drive after driving it high.

I'm still testing the overall stability of this, let's hope for the
best!

Thanks,
Geraldo Nascimento

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399pro-vmarc-som.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399pro-vmarc-som.dtsi
index aa70776e898a..1c5afc0413bc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399pro-vmarc-som.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399pro-vmarc-som.dtsi
@@ -383,13 +383,14 @@ &pcie_phy {
 };
 
 &pcie0 {
-	ep-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+	ep-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB4 (GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH | GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN)>;
 	num-lanes = <4>;
-	pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqnb_cpm>;
+	pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqnb_cpm>, <&pcie_perst>;
 	pinctrl-names = "default";
 	vpcie0v9-supply = <&vcca_0v9>;	/* VCC_0V9_S0 */
 	vpcie1v8-supply = <&vcca_1v8>;	/* VCC_1V8_S0 */
 	vpcie3v3-supply = <&vcc3v3_pcie>;
+	max-link-speed = <2>;
 	status = "okay";
 };
 
@@ -408,6 +409,10 @@ pcie {
 		pcie_pwr: pcie-pwr {
 			rockchip,pins = <4 RK_PD4 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_up>;
 		};
+		pcie_perst: pcie-perst {
+			rockchip,pins = <0 RK_PB4 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_up>;
+		};
+
 	};
 
 	pmic {


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Johan Jonker" <jbx6244@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] PCI: rockchip-host: drop wait on PERST# toggle
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 00:55:32 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQrKtFT0ldc70gKj@geday> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251103181038.GA1814635@bhelgaas>

On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 12:10:38PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 03:27:25AM -0300, Geraldo Nascimento wrote:
> > With this change PCIe will complete link-training with a known quirky
> > device - Samsung OEM PM981a SSD. This is completely against the PCIe
> > spec and yet it works as long as the power regulator for 3v3 PCIe
> > power is not defined as always-on or boot-on.
> 
> What is against the spec?  In what way is this SSD "known quirky"?  Is
> there a published erratum for it?
> 
> Removing this delay might make this SSD work, but if this delay is
> required per PCIe spec, how can we be confident that other devices
> will still work?
> 
> Reports of devices that still work is not really enough to move this
> from the "hack that makes one device work" column to the "safe and
> effective for all devices" column.
> 
> It's easy to see how *lack* of a delay can break something, but much
> harder to imagine how *removing* a delay can make something work.
> Devices must be able to tolerate pretty much arbitrary delays.

Hi Bjorn!

I did some more testing, intrigued by why would a delay of more than
5 ms after the enablement of the power rails trigger failure in
initial link-training.

Something in my intuition kept telling me this was PERST# related,
and so I followed that rabbit-hole.

It seems the following change will allow the SSD to work with the
Rockchip-IP PCIe core without any other changes. So it is purely
a DT change and we are able to keep the mandatory 100ms delay
after driving PERST# low, as well as the always-on/boot-on
properties of the 3v3 power regulator.

This time everything is within the PCIe spec AFAICT, PERST# indeed
is an Open Drain signal, and indeed it does requires pull-up resistor
to maintain the drive after driving it high.

I'm still testing the overall stability of this, let's hope for the
best!

Thanks,
Geraldo Nascimento

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399pro-vmarc-som.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399pro-vmarc-som.dtsi
index aa70776e898a..1c5afc0413bc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399pro-vmarc-som.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399pro-vmarc-som.dtsi
@@ -383,13 +383,14 @@ &pcie_phy {
 };
 
 &pcie0 {
-	ep-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+	ep-gpios = <&gpio0 RK_PB4 (GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH | GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN)>;
 	num-lanes = <4>;
-	pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqnb_cpm>;
+	pinctrl-0 = <&pcie_clkreqnb_cpm>, <&pcie_perst>;
 	pinctrl-names = "default";
 	vpcie0v9-supply = <&vcca_0v9>;	/* VCC_0V9_S0 */
 	vpcie1v8-supply = <&vcca_1v8>;	/* VCC_1V8_S0 */
 	vpcie3v3-supply = <&vcc3v3_pcie>;
+	max-link-speed = <2>;
 	status = "okay";
 };
 
@@ -408,6 +409,10 @@ pcie {
 		pcie_pwr: pcie-pwr {
 			rockchip,pins = <4 RK_PD4 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_up>;
 		};
+		pcie_perst: pcie-perst {
+			rockchip,pins = <0 RK_PB4 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_up>;
+		};
+
 	};
 
 	pmic {

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-05  3:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-03  6:26 [RFC PATCH 0/2] PCI: rockchip-host: support quirky devices Geraldo Nascimento
2025-11-03  6:26 ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-11-03  6:27 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: drop PCIe 3v3 always-on/boot-on Geraldo Nascimento
2025-11-03  6:27   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-11-03  6:27 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] PCI: rockchip-host: drop wait on PERST# toggle Geraldo Nascimento
2025-11-03  6:27   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-11-03 18:10   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-11-03 18:10     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-11-03 20:55     ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-11-03 20:55       ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-11-05  3:55     ` Geraldo Nascimento [this message]
2025-11-05  3:55       ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-11-05  9:06       ` Diederik de Haas
2025-11-05  9:06         ` Diederik de Haas
2025-11-05 21:22         ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-11-05 21:22           ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-11-07 10:27           ` Diederik de Haas
2025-11-07 10:27             ` Diederik de Haas
2025-11-09 23:51       ` Dragan Simic
2025-11-09 23:51         ` Dragan Simic
2025-11-09 23:57         ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-11-09 23:57           ` Geraldo Nascimento

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aQrKtFT0ldc70gKj@geday \
    --to=geraldogabriel@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jbx6244@gmail.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.