From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
Hoan Tran <hoan@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
Daniel Palmer <daniel@thingy.jp>,
Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@amd.com>,
Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@amd.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/15] gpio: dwapb: Use modern PM macros
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 18:27:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aR3v9yv2tXPiDIwn@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aR3qqkgdqFS6dlf6@xhacker>
On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 12:04:58AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 06:11:53PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 6:09 PM Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 05:42:59PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 10:43:13PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
...
> > > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > > > > struct dwapb_context *ctx;
> > > > > -#endif
> > > >
> > > > But why this? For the PM_SLEEP=n cases it will give an unrequested overhead.
> > >
> > > the pm_ptr() and pm_sleep_ptr() can optimize out the PM related
> > > functions, but those functions are still compiled, so if we keep the
> > > #ifdef, there will be build errors.
> >
> > Is this an expectation or you can share the error, please?
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c: In function ‘dwapb_irq_set_wake’:
> drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:368:51: error: ‘struct dwapb_gpio_port’ h
> as no member named ‘ctx’
> 368 | struct dwapb_context *ctx = gpio->ports[0].ctx;
Thank you!
I just answered in the other email that I will tag v4 after fixing typos
and dropping unrelated changes.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-19 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-19 14:43 [PATCH v3 00/15] gpio: Use modern PM macros Jisheng Zhang
2025-11-19 14:43 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] gpio: dwapb: " Jisheng Zhang
2025-11-19 15:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-19 15:51 ` Jisheng Zhang
2025-11-19 16:11 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-19 16:04 ` Jisheng Zhang
2025-11-19 16:27 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-11-19 14:43 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] gpio: brcmstb: " Jisheng Zhang
2025-11-19 14:43 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] gpio: htc-egpio: " Jisheng Zhang
2025-11-19 14:43 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] gpio: pl061: " Jisheng Zhang
2025-11-19 15:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-19 14:43 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] gpio: pxa: " Jisheng Zhang
2025-11-19 15:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-19 15:58 ` Jisheng Zhang
2025-11-19 16:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-19 14:43 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] gpio: ml-ioh: " Jisheng Zhang
2025-11-19 14:43 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] gpio: mlxbf2: " Jisheng Zhang
2025-11-19 14:43 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] gpio: msc313: " Jisheng Zhang
2025-11-19 14:43 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] gpio: omap: " Jisheng Zhang
2025-11-19 14:43 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] gpio: pch: " Jisheng Zhang
2025-11-19 14:43 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] gpio: tqmx86: " Jisheng Zhang
2025-11-19 14:43 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] gpio: uniphier: " Jisheng Zhang
2025-11-19 14:43 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] gpio: xgene: " Jisheng Zhang
2025-11-19 14:43 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] gpio: xilinx: " Jisheng Zhang
2025-11-19 14:43 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] gpio: zynq: " Jisheng Zhang
2025-11-19 15:52 ` [PATCH v3 00/15] gpio: " Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aR3v9yv2tXPiDIwn@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=daniel@thingy.jp \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com \
--cc=hoan@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=opendmb@gmail.com \
--cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
--cc=romain.perier@gmail.com \
--cc=shubhrajyoti.datta@amd.com \
--cc=srinivas.neeli@amd.com \
--cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.