From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: pratyush@kernel.org, jasonmiu@google.com, graf@amazon.com,
dmatlack@google.com, rientjes@google.com, corbet@lwn.net,
rdunlap@infradead.org, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com,
kanie@linux.alibaba.com, ojeda@kernel.org, aliceryhl@google.com,
masahiroy@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tj@kernel.org,
yoann.congal@smile.fr, mmaurer@google.com,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, chenridong@huawei.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
mark.rutland@arm.com, jannh@google.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, david@redhat.com,
joel.granados@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
anna.schumaker@oracle.com, song@kernel.org,
zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn, linux@weissschuh.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
rafael@kernel.org, dakr@kernel.org,
bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org, cw00.choi@samsung.com,
myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, yesanishhere@gmail.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com,
aleksander.lobakin@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, leon@kernel.org,
lukas@wunner.de, bhelgaas@google.com, wagi@kernel.org,
djeffery@redhat.com, stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com, ptyadav@amazon.de,
lennart@poettering.net, brauner@kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
saeedm@nvidia.com, ajayachandra@nvidia.com, jgg@nvidia.com,
parav@nvidia.com, leonro@nvidia.com, witu@nvidia.com,
hughd@google.com, skhawaja@google.com, chrisl@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/22] liveupdate: luo_core: integrate with KHO
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 13:29:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRcSpbwBabFjeYe3@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251107210526.257742-3-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 04:03:00PM -0500, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> Integrate the LUO with the KHO framework to enable passing LUO state
> across a kexec reboot.
>
> When LUO is transitioned to a "prepared" state, it tells KHO to
> finalize, so all memory segments that were added to KHO preservation
> list are getting preserved. After "Prepared" state no new segments
> can be preserved. If LUO is canceled, it also tells KHO to cancel the
> serialization, and therefore, later LUO can go back into the prepared
> state.
>
> This patch introduces the following changes:
> - During the KHO finalization phase allocate FDT blob.
> - Populate this FDT with a LUO compatibility string ("luo-v1").
>
> LUO now depends on `CONFIG_KEXEC_HANDOVER`. The core state transition
> logic (`luo_do_*_calls`) remains unimplemented in this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
> ---
> include/linux/liveupdate.h | 6 +
> include/linux/liveupdate/abi/luo.h | 54 +++++++
> kernel/liveupdate/luo_core.c | 243 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> kernel/liveupdate/luo_internal.h | 17 ++
> mm/mm_init.c | 4 +
> 5 files changed, 323 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/liveupdate/abi/luo.h
> create mode 100644 kernel/liveupdate/luo_internal.h
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/liveupdate.h b/include/linux/liveupdate.h
> index 730b76625fec..0be8804fc42a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/liveupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/liveupdate.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE
>
> +void __init liveupdate_init(void);
> +
> /* Return true if live update orchestrator is enabled */
> bool liveupdate_enabled(void);
>
> @@ -21,6 +23,10 @@ int liveupdate_reboot(void);
>
> #else /* CONFIG_LIVEUPDATE */
>
> +static inline void liveupdate_init(void)
> +{
> +}
The common practice is to place brackets at the same line with function
declaration.
...
> +static int __init luo_early_startup(void)
> +{
> + phys_addr_t fdt_phys;
> + int err, ln_size;
> + const void *ptr;
> +
> + if (!kho_is_enabled()) {
> + if (liveupdate_enabled())
> + pr_warn("Disabling liveupdate because KHO is disabled\n");
> + luo_global.enabled = false;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /* Retrieve LUO subtree, and verify its format. */
> + err = kho_retrieve_subtree(LUO_FDT_KHO_ENTRY_NAME, &fdt_phys);
> + if (err) {
> + if (err != -ENOENT) {
> + pr_err("failed to retrieve FDT '%s' from KHO: %pe\n",
> + LUO_FDT_KHO_ENTRY_NAME, ERR_PTR(err));
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + luo_global.fdt_in = __va(fdt_phys);
phys_to_virt is clearer, isn't it?
> + err = fdt_node_check_compatible(luo_global.fdt_in, 0,
> + LUO_FDT_COMPATIBLE);
...
> +void __init liveupdate_init(void)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + err = luo_early_startup();
> + if (err) {
> + pr_err("The incoming tree failed to initialize properly [%pe], disabling live update\n",
> + ERR_PTR(err));
> + luo_global.enabled = false;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/* Called during boot to create LUO fdt tree */
^ create outgoing
> +static int __init luo_late_startup(void)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + if (!liveupdate_enabled())
> + return 0;
> +
> + err = luo_fdt_setup();
> + if (err)
> + luo_global.enabled = false;
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +late_initcall(luo_late_startup);
It would be nice to have a comment explaining why late_initcall() is fine
and why there's no need to initialize the outgoing fdt earlier.
> +/**
> + * luo_alloc_preserve - Allocate, zero, and preserve memory.
I think this and the "free" counterparts would be useful for any KHO users,
even those that don't need LUO.
> + * @size: The number of bytes to allocate.
> + *
> + * Allocates a physically contiguous block of zeroed pages that is large
> + * enough to hold @size bytes. The allocated memory is then registered with
> + * KHO for preservation across a kexec.
> + *
> + * Note: The actual allocated size will be rounded up to the nearest
> + * power-of-two page boundary.
> + *
> + * @return A virtual pointer to the allocated and preserved memory on success,
> + * or an ERR_PTR() encoded error on failure.
> + */
> +void *luo_alloc_preserve(size_t size)
> +{
> + struct folio *folio;
> + int order, ret;
> +
> + if (!size)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> + order = get_order(size);
> + if (order > MAX_PAGE_ORDER)
> + return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
High order allocations would likely fail or at least cause a heavy reclaim.
For now it seems that we won't be needing really large contiguous chunks so
maybe limiting this to PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER?
Later if we'd need higher order allocations we can try to allocate with
__GFP_NORETRY or __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL with a fallback to vmalloc.
> +
> + folio = folio_alloc(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, order);
> + if (!folio)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + ret = kho_preserve_folio(folio);
> + if (ret) {
> + folio_put(folio);
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> + }
> +
> + return folio_address(folio);
> +}
> +
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-14 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-07 21:02 [PATCH v5 00/22] Live Update Orchestrator Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:02 ` [PATCH v5 01/22] liveupdate: luo_core: luo_ioctl: " Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-13 13:37 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-13 13:56 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 02/22] liveupdate: luo_core: integrate with KHO Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-10 13:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-10 15:43 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-11 20:16 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-11 20:57 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-12 13:25 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-12 14:58 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-13 16:31 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-13 18:38 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-11 20:25 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-11 20:39 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-11 20:42 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-12 10:21 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-12 12:46 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-12 13:33 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-12 15:14 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-12 17:39 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 11:29 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2025-11-14 14:48 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 03/22] reboot: call liveupdate_reboot() before kexec Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 11:30 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 04/22] liveupdate: Kconfig: Make debugfs optional Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 05/22] liveupdate: kho: when live update add KHO image during kexec load Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-10 12:47 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-10 15:31 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-11 20:18 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-11 20:59 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 06/22] liveupdate: luo_session: add sessions support Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-12 20:39 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-12 20:47 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 12:49 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-14 14:07 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 07/22] liveupdate: luo_ioctl: add user interface Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-14 12:57 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-14 14:09 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 08/22] liveupdate: luo_file: implement file systems callbacks Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-10 17:27 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-10 17:42 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 09/22] liveupdate: luo_session: Add ioctls for file preservation and state management Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 10/22] liveupdate: luo_flb: Introduce File-Lifecycle-Bound global state Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 11/22] docs: add luo documentation Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 12/22] MAINTAINERS: add liveupdate entry Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 13/22] mm: shmem: use SHMEM_F_* flags instead of VM_* flags Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 14/22] mm: shmem: allow freezing inode mapping Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 15/22] mm: shmem: export some functions to internal.h Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 16/22] liveupdate: luo_file: add private argument to store runtime state Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 17/22] mm: memfd_luo: allow preserving memfd Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 18/22] docs: add documentation for memfd preservation via LUO Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-13 16:55 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-13 16:59 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 19/22] selftests/liveupdate: Add userspace API selftests Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 20/22] selftests/liveupdate: Add kexec-based selftest for session lifecycle Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 21/22] selftests/liveupdate: Add kexec test for multiple and empty sessions Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 21:03 ` [PATCH v5 22/22] tests/liveupdate: Add in-kernel liveupdate test Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-12 20:23 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-12 20:40 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-16 18:36 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-11-17 14:09 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-07 22:33 ` [PATCH v5 00/22] Live Update Orchestrator Andrew Morton
2025-11-08 18:13 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-11-08 18:36 ` Andrew Morton
2025-11-09 2:31 ` Pasha Tatashin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRcSpbwBabFjeYe3@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=ajayachandra@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anna.schumaker@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huawei.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=djeffery@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jasonmiu@google.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
--cc=kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=lennart@poettering.net \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mmaurer@google.com \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=ptyadav@amazon.de \
--cc=quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=wagi@kernel.org \
--cc=witu@nvidia.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yesanishhere@gmail.com \
--cc=yoann.congal@smile.fr \
--cc=zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.