From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" via <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Cc: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>,
Anthony PERARD <anthony@xenproject.org>,
"Edgar E . Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>,
<qemu-arm@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-for-10.2] hw/arm: Re-enable xenpvh machine in qemu-system-arm/aarch64 binaries
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 17:07:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRtIM6H6IAdiKv1v@zapote> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251117091253.56009-1-philmd@linaro.org>
On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 10:12:53AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> While registering the ARM/Aarch64 machine interfaces
> in commit 38c5ab40031 ("hw/arm: Filter machine types
> for qemu-system-arm/aarch64 binaries"), we missed the
> XenPV machine. Correct that.
>
> Reported-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>
> ---
> 1/ Review got likely unnoticed by Xen folks because no
> Xen-specific entry in MAINTAINERS:
>
> $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f hw/arm/xen-pvh.c
> Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> (maintainer:ARM TCG CPUs)
> qemu-arm@nongnu.org (open list:ARM TCG CPUs)
> qemu-devel@nongnu.org (open list:All patches CC here)
>
> 2/ Should we restrict it to aa64 only?
> ---
> hw/arm/xen-pvh.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/xen-pvh.c b/hw/arm/xen-pvh.c
> index 1a9eeb01c8e..86a02966161 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/xen-pvh.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/xen-pvh.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #include "hw/boards.h"
> #include "system/system.h"
> #include "hw/xen/xen-pvh-common.h"
> +#include "hw/arm/machines-qom.h"
>
> #define TYPE_XEN_ARM MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("xenpvh")
>
> @@ -95,6 +96,7 @@ static const TypeInfo xen_arm_machine_type = {
> .class_init = xen_arm_machine_class_init,
> .instance_size = sizeof(XenPVHMachineState),
> .instance_init = xen_arm_instance_init,
> + .interfaces = arm_aarch64_machine_interfaces,
> };
>
> static void xen_arm_machine_register_types(void)
> --
> 2.51.0
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Cc: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>,
Anthony PERARD <anthony@xenproject.org>,
"Edgar E . Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>,
<qemu-arm@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-for-10.2] hw/arm: Re-enable xenpvh machine in qemu-system-arm/aarch64 binaries
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 17:07:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRtIM6H6IAdiKv1v@zapote> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251117091253.56009-1-philmd@linaro.org>
On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 10:12:53AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> While registering the ARM/Aarch64 machine interfaces
> in commit 38c5ab40031 ("hw/arm: Filter machine types
> for qemu-system-arm/aarch64 binaries"), we missed the
> XenPV machine. Correct that.
>
> Reported-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>
> ---
> 1/ Review got likely unnoticed by Xen folks because no
> Xen-specific entry in MAINTAINERS:
>
> $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f hw/arm/xen-pvh.c
> Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> (maintainer:ARM TCG CPUs)
> qemu-arm@nongnu.org (open list:ARM TCG CPUs)
> qemu-devel@nongnu.org (open list:All patches CC here)
>
> 2/ Should we restrict it to aa64 only?
> ---
> hw/arm/xen-pvh.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/xen-pvh.c b/hw/arm/xen-pvh.c
> index 1a9eeb01c8e..86a02966161 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/xen-pvh.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/xen-pvh.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #include "hw/boards.h"
> #include "system/system.h"
> #include "hw/xen/xen-pvh-common.h"
> +#include "hw/arm/machines-qom.h"
>
> #define TYPE_XEN_ARM MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("xenpvh")
>
> @@ -95,6 +96,7 @@ static const TypeInfo xen_arm_machine_type = {
> .class_init = xen_arm_machine_class_init,
> .instance_size = sizeof(XenPVHMachineState),
> .instance_init = xen_arm_instance_init,
> + .interfaces = arm_aarch64_machine_interfaces,
> };
>
> static void xen_arm_machine_register_types(void)
> --
> 2.51.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-17 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-17 9:12 [PATCH-for-10.2] hw/arm: Re-enable xenpvh machine in qemu-system-arm/aarch64 binaries Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-11-17 16:07 ` Edgar E. Iglesias via [this message]
2025-11-17 16:07 ` Edgar E. Iglesias via
2025-11-18 18:21 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRtIM6H6IAdiKv1v@zapote \
--to=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=anthony@xenproject.org \
--cc=edgar.iglesias@amd.com \
--cc=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
--cc=paul@xen.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.