From: Alessandro Decina <alessandro.d@gmail.com>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Tirthendu Sarkar <tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 1/1] i40e: xsk: advance next_to_clean on status descriptors
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 17:37:14 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRwUGnyFBxrkjGl7@lima-default> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aRtPXS8haLNHu8H1@boxer>
On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 05:37:49PM +0100, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> This revision is much more clear to me. Only thing that might be bothering
> someone is doubled i40e_rx_bi() call in i40e_get_rx_buffer(). Not sure if
> we can do about it though as we need to use ntp from before potential
> increment.
>
> ...maybe pass rx_buffer to i40e_get_rx_buffer() ?
Surely the compiler isn't going to actually reload here, but yeah not
great code wise. How about I pass it the buffer and rename to
i40e_prepare_rx_buffer to better match what's happening now?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alessandro Decina <alessandro.d@gmail.com>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Tirthendu Sarkar <tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v3 1/1] i40e: xsk: advance next_to_clean on status descriptors
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 17:37:14 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRwUGnyFBxrkjGl7@lima-default> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aRtPXS8haLNHu8H1@boxer>
On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 05:37:49PM +0100, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> This revision is much more clear to me. Only thing that might be bothering
> someone is doubled i40e_rx_bi() call in i40e_get_rx_buffer(). Not sure if
> we can do about it though as we need to use ntp from before potential
> increment.
>
> ...maybe pass rx_buffer to i40e_get_rx_buffer() ?
Surely the compiler isn't going to actually reload here, but yeah not
great code wise. How about I pass it the buffer and rename to
i40e_prepare_rx_buffer to better match what's happening now?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-18 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-13 8:24 [PATCH net v3 0/1] i40e: xsk: advance next_to_clean on status descriptors Alessandro Decina
2025-11-13 8:24 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alessandro Decina
2025-11-13 8:24 ` [PATCH net v3 1/1] " Alessandro Decina
2025-11-13 8:24 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alessandro Decina
2025-11-14 5:49 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2025-11-14 5:49 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2025-11-14 13:01 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-11-14 13:01 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-11-15 7:58 ` Alessandro Decina
2025-11-15 7:58 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alessandro Decina
2025-11-17 16:37 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-11-17 16:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-11-18 6:37 ` Alessandro Decina [this message]
2025-11-18 6:37 ` Alessandro Decina
2025-11-18 8:04 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-11-18 8:04 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aRwUGnyFBxrkjGl7@lima-default \
--to=alessandro.d@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.